Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

16-year-old faces threats after challenging Michele Bachmann to a debate [May 20, 2011]
CBS News ^ | May 20, 2011 3:07 PM | Stephanie Condon

Posted on 05/28/2011 8:26:11 PM PDT by SeekAndFind

A 16-year-old high school student says she is facing online threats after calling into question Republican Rep. Michele Bachmann's knowledge of the Constitution.

What started as a harmless -- if cheeky -- way of pointing out Bachmann's historical mistakes has turned darker for New Jersey high school sophomore Amy Meyers, the Courier Post Online reports.

Last month, Meyers posted an open letter online challenging Bachmann to a constitutional debate.

"I have found quite a few of your statements regarding the Constitution of the United States, the quality of public school education and general U.S. civics matters to be factually incorrect, inaccurately applied or grossly distorted," Myers wrote. "As one of a handful of women in Congress, you hold a distinct privilege and responsibility to better represent your gender nationally. The statements you make help to serve an injustice to not only the position of Congresswoman, but women everywhere."

Several media outlets reported on Myers' challenge. As a result, she said, people have threatened violence against her and threatened to publish her address online, the Courier Post reports. Myers' high school has also reprotedly received inquiries regarding Myers' letter.

"A lot of them are calling me a whore," Myers said of the online remarks against her. Added her father Wayne Myers: "I personally did not think there would be a reaction like actual stalking and the vitriol that's coming out."

Myers has also seen a good deal of positive feedback online. Bachmann's office has said it would not respond to the debate challenge.

As leader of the House Tea Party Caucus, Bachmann has expressed an unwavering commitment to the Constitution, even organizing classes on the Constitution for members of Congress. She's used her platform as a Tea Party leader to build a national profile and may soon enter the race

(Excerpt) Read more at cbsnews.com ...


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: constitution; creationism; debate; freelazamataz; michelebachmann
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-60 next last

1 posted on 05/28/2011 8:26:18 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

MORE HERE:

http://www.religiondispatches.org/dispatches/laurilebo/4675/hey_michele_bachmann,_i_got_your_nobel_laureates_right_here/

______________________________________________________________________________

It’s gotta suck for Minnesota Congresswoman Michele Bachmann. All she wants to do is go around the country trumping up support for a presidential run by making a bunch of unsubstantiated assertions disconnected from reality.

Exhibit A:

…we also know that the very founders that wrote those documents worked tirelessly until slavery was no more in the United States … men like John Quincy Adams... would not rest until slavery was extinguished in the country.

Quite often, she gets away with saying stuff like this. But lately some meddling kids have been calling her out, asking her to back up her assertions with actual evidence.

Last month, a New Jersey high school student challenged Bachmann to a debate about the US Constitution. Ann Myers said the congresswoman frequently distorts facts about the document and the Founding Fathers. In response, commenters on tea party web sites started making threats of violence against the student for having the audacity to question Bachmann.

The 16-year-old Myers says that some commenters have called her “a whore.”

Bachmann has not responded to the challenge, nor has she issued a statement condemning the threats.

This week, 17-year-old Baton Rouge high school student Zack Kopplin called on Bachmann to back up her statement from 2006 in which she said lots of Nobel Prize winners support intelligent design.

Exhibit B: “There is a controversy among scientists about whether evolution is a fact… hundreds and hundreds of scientists, many of them holding Nobel prizes, believe in intelligent design.”

Kopplin is leading a charge to repeal the Louisiana Science Education Act, an anti-evolution law that would sneak the teaching of creationism into science class. I’ve analyzed the purpose of the law here.

What’s really cool about Kopplin’s campaign is that he has lined up support for the repeal from 43 Nobel Laureates.

So Kopplin, in an open letter on his web site Wednesday, basically said, “I’ve shown mine, now you, Congresswoman Bachmann, show me yours.”

He writes:

Does Congresswoman Bachmann really think the public will fall for her sleight of hand and believe she has Nobel Laureate scientists who support these unscientific theories?

Congresswoman Bachmann, I see your “hundreds” of scientists, and raise you millions of scientists.

For the next hand, I raise you 43 Nobel Laureate scientists. That’s right: 43 Nobel Laureate scientists have endorsed our effort to repeal Louisiana’s creationism law.

Major science organizations, including the American Association for the Advancement of Science, which represents over 10 million scientists, have publicly endorsed the repeal.

Congresswoman Bachmann, you claim that Nobel Laureates support creationism. Show me your hand. If you want to be taken seriously by voters while you run for President, back up your claims with facts. Can you match 43 Nobel Laureates, or do you fold?

Kopplin is testifying before Louisiana lawmakers today urging them to repeal the Louisiana Science Education Act.


2 posted on 05/28/2011 8:28:05 PM PDT by SeekAndFind (u)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Democrats, using a child to attack.


3 posted on 05/28/2011 8:31:15 PM PDT by cripplecreek (Remember the River Raisin! (look it up))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
****"As one of a handful of women in Congress, you hold a distinct privilege and responsibility to better represent your gender nationally. The statements you make help to serve an injustice to not only the position of Congresswoman, but women everywhere." ****

Translation: since she's not yipee and yahoo for abortion she's anti-woman.

4 posted on 05/28/2011 8:32:37 PM PDT by fkabuckeyesrule
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
…we also know that the very founders that wrote those documents worked tirelessly until slavery was no more in the United States … men like John Quincy Adams... would not rest until slavery was extinguished in the country.

Um...unless I learned wrong, JQA was strongly opposed to slavery...I am not sure what is incorrect about her statement.

The Nobel Prize winner thing is weird though...and I really hate the whole crevo debate anyway.

5 posted on 05/28/2011 8:34:30 PM PDT by RockinRight (Herman Cain stopped for gas in South Carolina and inadvertently won a Primary debate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

Yep!


6 posted on 05/28/2011 8:34:30 PM PDT by Red_Devil 232 (VietVet - USMC All Ready On The Right? All Ready On The Left? All Ready On The Firing Line!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Red_Devil 232

Plus they’re desperately trying to keep this non story alive.

Hell I challenge Obama to a foreign policy debate. Where’s my media coverage?


7 posted on 05/28/2011 8:36:20 PM PDT by cripplecreek (Remember the River Raisin! (look it up))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Bachman really needs to get the facts right or shut up. I like her stance on many issues but everything we say is subject to microscopic analysis. A liberal can get away with slinging BS but we can’t.


8 posted on 05/28/2011 8:36:38 PM PDT by SWAMPSNIPER (The Second Amendment, a matter of fact, not a matter of opinion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

I believe many Nobel Laureates do believe in Intelligent Design. Mother Theresa for one (Yes, she got it for Peace, but maybe that’s just more proof she’s got it right).

However, I also believe none of them would want to come out and say it, because they know they would be CRUCIFIED by the intellectual establishment. See the movie EXpelled.


9 posted on 05/28/2011 8:37:06 PM PDT by I still care (I miss my friends, bagels, and the NYC skyline - but not the taxes. I love the South.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

>> “A lot of them are calling me a whore,” Myers said

Clearly offensive, and unnecessary. Ironically, Myers criticism of Bachmann is based in sexism.


10 posted on 05/28/2011 8:37:58 PM PDT by Gene Eric (*** Jesus ***)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gene Eric

RE: A lot of them are calling me a whore

Who are these “them” Myers is referring to ?


11 posted on 05/28/2011 8:39:17 PM PDT by SeekAndFind (u)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
Michelle said “forefathers” not “Founding Fathers” in her statement about the end of slavery.BIG difference but CBS can't edit a Leftist lie—ain't in them.
The 105 “hidden” billion WAS hidden along with thousands of other things in a massive bill that had to be passed before we could see what's in it. An unread bill being voted on has near unlimited “hidden” details.
Now does the Little MSM controlled Marxist bobby-soxer have even ONE documented incident where Rep Bachman was wrong about the US Constitution?
No! the Bieber bait bimbette is as brain dead and pliant as all liberal tools.
12 posted on 05/28/2011 8:40:15 PM PDT by Happy Rain ("I speak LOUD and I carry an even BIGGER stick! And I use it too-WHACK!!!"-candidate Yosemite Sam.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Who knows if the reports of abuse are legit. We do know, however, that Myers holds Bachmann to a set of standards based on gender which is pure, ‘unadulterated’ bigotry.


13 posted on 05/28/2011 8:42:27 PM PDT by Gene Eric (*** Jesus ***)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

In New Jersey? I find this very hard to believe.


14 posted on 05/28/2011 8:43:03 PM PDT by pnh102 (Regarding liberalism, always attribute to malice what you think can be explained by stupidity. - Me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
Who is the biggest fool, the 16 year old. Are the ones that think this is a news story. Reporter needs to find something to write about. I remember the young man on TV, just graduated from college, that thought the leaning tower of Pisa, was in pizza land.
15 posted on 05/28/2011 8:44:46 PM PDT by org.whodat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

I remember that Rush challenged Obama to a debate and the media didn’t mention it.


16 posted on 05/28/2011 8:45:28 PM PDT by rabidralph
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek
Hell I challenge Obama to a foreign policy debate. Where’s my media coverage?

When you're done, my seven-year-old will challenge him to a 'how-many-states-are-there-in-the-US' debate.

17 posted on 05/28/2011 8:45:51 PM PDT by Hoodat (Yet in all these things we are more than conquerors through Him who loved us. - (Rom 8:37))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: RockinRight
I think their issue is that JQA wasn't a founding father like his father
18 posted on 05/28/2011 8:46:40 PM PDT by aynrandfreak (Being a Democrat means never having to say you're sorry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Hoodat

Obama promised to rebuild America’s standing in the world and looks like he’s going to leave us with fewer allies than we’ve had since prior to WWI.


19 posted on 05/28/2011 8:49:09 PM PDT by cripplecreek (Remember the River Raisin! (look it up))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
Here is the telling part of the story to me:

Several media outlets reported on Myers' challenge.

A 16-year-old from New Jersey posts an inane challenge to a congresswoman from another state, and "several" media outlets find it NEWSWORTHY? I challenge my own congresscritters all the time, and nobody ever thinks that's newsworthy.

20 posted on 05/28/2011 8:50:42 PM PDT by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Exactly. If it was done it’s wrong and any idiot stupid enough to resort to RAT name-calling tactics deserved to be outed. So, as when the moonbats threatened Wisconsin state legislators, let’s have the IP addresses and go get them. No conservative wants this kind of jerk on our side.

On the other hand, we’ve been accused of saying things in the past - like the “n-word” at the Tea Party rally...? Without proof, who knows what was said?

And no, I’m not saying it’s OK to call her a whore just because every liberal seems to get away calling Republicans vile things like that.


21 posted on 05/28/2011 8:50:58 PM PDT by bigbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

CBS should be criticizing a 16 yr old know-it-all, and especially her parents, for the stupidity and useful idiocy of this silly “debate.” Indeed, how “childish”

And for the Democrats to use a child to further their own political gain

How much press and air time did CBS give the woman who suggested the “everybody draw Mohammed day” and then had to go into permanent hiding?

Where’s the coverage and continuing coverage, on that?


22 posted on 05/28/2011 8:51:09 PM PDT by A_Former_Democrat ("Celebrate 'Civility'")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

See-BS News.
Credibility: 0.
‘Nuf said.


23 posted on 05/28/2011 8:51:52 PM PDT by Nevermore (...just a typical cracker, clinging to my Constitutional rights...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek
Democrats, using a child to attack

Yup. That's all this is - a strawman setup, hyping an insignificant heckler into a media Joan of Arc.

Best thing to do is ignore it and let it fade away, the schemers in the MSM will move on to their next fabricted smear campaign.

24 posted on 05/28/2011 8:52:15 PM PDT by Regulator (Watch Out! Americans are on the March! America Forever, Mexico Never!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: CharlesWayneCT

RE: I challenge my own congresscritters all the time, and nobody ever thinks that’s newsworthy.

Well, for one, you’re not a teenager. Secondly, there’s no interest on the part of the mainstream media to make a Democrat look ignorant. Thirdly, the mainstream media is just itching to prove that a Tea Party candidate ( a so called conservative Goliath ) can be slain by a liberal “David”. And finally, if they can do that, they can then by implication, tar and feather the entire Tea Party movement as composed of ignoramuses who support an ignoramus as a leader.

That’s their agenda.


25 posted on 05/28/2011 8:55:32 PM PDT by SeekAndFind (u)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

the journolist knows exactly what she is doing. this is a cleverly disguised form of the alinsky ridicule attack. michele is correct. she comes out fine as long as she ignores it. the statists now need a response, let them debate themselves.


26 posted on 05/28/2011 8:57:04 PM PDT by dadfly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

This is a news story....?


27 posted on 05/28/2011 8:58:48 PM PDT by Godwin1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Happy Rain
I'm wrong,she said “founders” and traced their efforts to end slavery to JQA.
Had to listen to the speech again—pretty good,I knew what she was talking about even with the little flub—she should have said forefathers.
28 posted on 05/28/2011 9:00:32 PM PDT by Happy Rain ("I speak LOUD and I carry an even BIGGER stick! And I use it too-WHACK!!!"-candidate Yosemite Sam.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

B.S.
Written by a true leftist. There are terms that a conservative would never use. Probably written by a leftwing teacher or at least with a leftwing’s assistance.


29 posted on 05/28/2011 9:02:05 PM PDT by Outlaw Woman ("...; because thou hast rejected knowledge, I will also reject thee,... "Hosea 4:6)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson; SeekAndFind; cripplecreek; fkabuckeyesrule; RockinRight; Red_Devil 232; ...

It is high time that every Freeper begin urging Jim Rob to publicly challenge Obama to a debate on the constitution.

When Obama tells Jim via his cronies in the MSM that he refuses to accept the challenge, we then get every freeper that has a blog to write stories about the way Obama is afraid to debate him.

Said Freep bloggers should repeat a call to demand Obama debate Jim Rob at least once a Month up to next years election.

Eventually, Google search will have millions of references to Obama being afraid of debating Jim Robinson of FreeRepublic on the constitution.


30 posted on 05/28/2011 9:02:20 PM PDT by Freepmanchew ( <:)))>< Proverbs 30:7-9)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

This kid is a dope and a tool but the fact is Bachmann has been a disappointment as a candidate so far. As for the intelligent design/science thing, I think Dinesh D’Sousa listed scientists who believe in God in What’s So Great About Christianity. Whether they won Nobels or not, I don’t remember.

I’m pretty sure that nowadays belief in God disqualifies a person from winning a Nobel (or an Oscar too!). It’s only where honesty matters that belief in God really rates.

Either way, I don’t think Michele Bachmann (who I really like) is ready for prime time.


31 posted on 05/28/2011 9:02:34 PM PDT by PaleoBob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
First of all, I would point out that I have no opinion on Bachmann at this point.
Second, I wouldn't call this kid a whore...yet - until I find out what the pimps at See-BS or DNC are paying her.
But she's most definitely a whiny brat.

Listen, little girl: you had the temerity to make a public spectacle of yourself, to call out this congresswoman and essentially say she's ignorant & deceitful. Then, when Michelle's friends have the temerity to suggest that they believe your intentions are less than honorable, and that you've been put up to it by a pimping party and pimping network, you want to whine to national media - See-BS News, in particular - and complain, "Ahm juss a widdoo goil and all vees angwy people awe pickin' on me!"

Anybody care to bet about the kind of parent that raised this one?

32 posted on 05/28/2011 9:06:33 PM PDT by Nevermore (...just a typical cracker, clinging to my Constitutional rights...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: I still care
I believe many Nobel Laureates do believe in Intelligent Design. Mother Theresa for one

1, Dead.

2. Not a real Nobel prize

3. What statement did she ever make in support of ID?

33 posted on 05/28/2011 9:07:06 PM PDT by Oztrich Boy (Monarchy is the one system of government where power is exercised for the good of all - Aristotle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
By the way, regarding the statement that (gasp!) "“There is a controversy among scientists about whether evolution is a fact," I certainly hope so - for any scientist worth their salt.

Speaking as a scientist, and one who personally has little problem with evolution and creationism, any real scientist has to acknowledge that evolution is a THEORY. Perhaps a very good & sound one, depending on your argument, but a THEORY just the same, and NOT a "fact".

34 posted on 05/28/2011 9:14:34 PM PDT by Nevermore (...just a typical cracker, clinging to my Constitutional rights...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Oztrich Boy

A little research showed me this...

www.detectingdesign.com/Nobel%20Laureates%20Who%20Favor%20Intelligent%20Design.doc

Nobel Laureates Who Favor Intelligent Design
Compiled by: Sean D. Pitman M.D
1/1/2007

Charles Hard Townes, winner of a Nobel Prize in Physics and a UC Berkeley professor makes the following interesting argument:

“Intelligent design, as one sees it from a scientific point of view, seems to be quite real. This is a very special universe: it’s remarkable that it came out just this way. If the laws of physics weren’t just the way they are, we couldn’t be here at all. The sun couldn’t be there, the laws of gravity and nuclear laws and magnetic theory, quantum mechanics, and so on have to be just the way they are for us to be here.
Some scientists argue that “well, there’s an enormous number of universes and each one is a little different. This one just happened to turn out right.” Well, that’s a postulate, and it’s a pretty fantastic postulate — it assumes there really are an enormous number of universes and that the laws could be different for each of them. The other possibility is that ours was planned, and that’s why it has come out so specially.”

http://www.berkeley.edu/news/media/releases/2005/06/17_townes.shtml

Dr. Robert Gange is a research scientist (cryophisics), engineer, and adjunct professor the David Sarnoff Research Center in Princeton. He just so happened to write a pro-creation book entitled, “Origins and Destiny”. Aside from the book itself, the back cover has this interesting endorsement from the late mathematician, physicist, and Nobel Laureate Eugene P. Wigner (1963, physics):

“I was particularly pleased with Dr. Gange’s refusal of the idea of materialism, and the convincing arguments supporting that refusal. In fact, the book will be a welcome response to materialism. Good luck, for a good book!” (http://www.ccel.us/gange.toc.html#Ab)

Wigner also noted in his widely quoted paper, The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Mathematics in the Physical Sciences, that scientists often take for granted the remarkable—even miraculous—effectiveness of mathematics in describing the real world:

“The enormous usefulness of mathematics is something bordering on the mysterious . . . . There is no rational explanation for it . . . . The miracle of the appropriateness of the language of mathematics for the formulation of the laws of physics is a wonderful gift which we neither understand nor deserve.” - Eugene Wigner, “The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Mathematics in the Physical Sciences,” Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics, vol. 13 (1960): 1-14.

Interesting comments for an acclaimed “modern” genius with a Nobel Prize in physics. Such comments seem to mirror Einstein’s well-known observation:

“You find it strange that I consider the comprehensibility of the world (to the extent that we are authorized to speak of such a comprehensibility) as a miracle or as an eternal mystery. Well, a priori one should expect a chaotic world, which cannot be grasped by the mind in any way . . . . [T]he kind of order created by Newton’s theory of gravitation, for example, is wholly different. Even if man proposes the axioms of the theory, the success of such a project presupposes a high degree of ordering of the objective world, and this could not be expected a priori. That is the “miracle” which is being constantly reinforced as our knowledge expands.” Albert Einstein, Letters to Solovine (New York: Philosophical Library, 1987), 131.
Richard E Smalley, winner of the 1996 Nobel Prize in chemistry, as asked to present the keynote address at Tuskegee University’s 79th Annual Scholarship Convocation/Parents’ Recognition Program. In his address he discussed the increasing lifespan of humans as a result of cures and treatments for various infections and diseases. He urged his listeners to seriously consider their role as “higher species” on this planet. He also mentioned the ideas of evolution versus creation, Darwin versus the Biblical Genesis account, noting that the burden of proof is on those who do not believe that “Genesis was right, and there was a creation, and that the Creator is still involved”. (1)

After reading the book “Origins of Life” by Fazale Rana and Hugh Ross (2), among other books by Rana, Richard Smalley make the following endorsement: “ Evolution has just been dealt its death blow. After reading Origins of Life, with my background in chemistry and physics, it is clear evolution could not have occurred.” (3)

Toward the last days of his life, in an interview with William Dembski, Smalley predicted that ID would be mainstreamed in five years and that evolution, in its conventional materialistic sense, would be dead within ten. Although I am personally just a bit skeptical as to the time frame, it will be interesting to see if his predictions are eventually borne out. (4)

1. http://www.tuskegee.edu/Global/story.asp?S=2382961&nav=CcWvRbj5
2. http://www.amazon.com/Origins-Life-Biblical-Evolutionary-Models/dp/1576833445/ref=pd_rhf_p_1/105-8093794-4249248
3. http://www.lifesite.net/ldn/2005/oct/05100605.html
4. http://www.uncommondescent.com/archives/1737


35 posted on 05/28/2011 9:16:57 PM PDT by SeekAndFind (u)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek
In the AP story about this I posted a week ago, this child's name was also published and the story insinuated that Tea Party members had been making threats.

This entire story doesn't pass the smell test.

36 posted on 05/28/2011 9:18:26 PM PDT by Rational Thought
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

I could swear I read this story about four months ago.


37 posted on 05/28/2011 9:18:48 PM PDT by Darkwolf377 (You can't go! All the plants are gonna die!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Freepmanchew

Thing is progressives don’t care about the Constitution and there is a large segment of the populace who have no clue how this nation is designed to work.


38 posted on 05/28/2011 9:19:20 PM PDT by SWAMPSNIPER (The Second Amendment, a matter of fact, not a matter of opinion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind; Oztrich Boy

Well Oztrich Boy, care to comment about the proof found by SeekAndFind?


39 posted on 05/28/2011 9:26:51 PM PDT by SoConPubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Darkwolf377

RE: I could swear I read this story about four months ago.

This story is very recent ( maybe just last week ).


40 posted on 05/28/2011 9:27:53 PM PDT by SeekAndFind (u)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Maybe this kid should ask Obama what year it is, most likely he will get it wrong..since for some reason he thinks its 2008


41 posted on 05/28/2011 9:28:33 PM PDT by Sarah Barracuda
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Understood, but again, I seem to recall a story here about 4-6 months ago about some kid challenging Bachman after her Lexington/Concord snafu, complaining that he/she was being threatened and such. Maybe I’m just old.


42 posted on 05/28/2011 9:29:58 PM PDT by Darkwolf377 (You can't go! All the plants are gonna die!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Darkwolf377

Your right.This is a old story being recycled by the Soros Media .


43 posted on 05/28/2011 9:36:45 PM PDT by ncalburt (NO MORE WIMPS need to apply to fight the Soros Funded Puppet !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
By the way, I wonder how See-BS would feel if one of their major network stars, in typical humor, "joking" about this girl being raped in Yankee Stadium?

Nah, they'd never stand for that...

44 posted on 05/28/2011 9:40:49 PM PDT by Nevermore (...just a typical cracker, clinging to my Constitutional rights...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Shows the leftist jack booted thugs for what they are.


45 posted on 05/28/2011 10:01:15 PM PDT by Revel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Freepmanchew

No, but make your demand that he debate Sarah Palin and I’ll go for it.


46 posted on 05/28/2011 10:01:32 PM PDT by Jim Robinson (Rebellion is brewing!! Impeach the corrupt Marxist bastard!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
My kid in Middle School has challenged James Hansen (NASA) to a debate on Global Warming.

No answer. </sarc

47 posted on 05/28/2011 10:39:59 PM PDT by cruise_missile
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
My kid in Middle School has challenged James Hansen (NASA) to a debate on Global Warming.

No answer. </sarc

48 posted on 05/28/2011 10:51:15 PM PDT by cruise_missile
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nevermore

As a young boy in a parochial I was initiated to the debating culture about the third grade. I recall a debate before before a ladies aid group about water and fire being most important. The boys team won with water, one argument being water puts out fire. The girls were not up to making any arguments about fire turning water into steam for engines. However. my story is how I got caught up in my new ability to debate to sometimes be obnoxious. The saving part of my life was when I tried my debating skills on my mother. My mother won practically all the debates even if she had to use a swatter to my rear.


49 posted on 05/28/2011 11:01:30 PM PDT by noinfringers2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

Bingo! LOL so pathetic... As if a 16 years “knows it all”.... Give me a break...


50 posted on 05/29/2011 3:52:25 AM PDT by Sprite518
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-60 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson