Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: CharlesWayneCT

The IAEA presented the whitewash some of us knew to expect in their official report - praising the Japanese response. Then they went home and ‘leaked’ that they didn’t get the information re radiation released they wanted.


15 posted on 06/23/2011 1:30:03 PM PDT by ransomnote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: ransomnote

I guess we should be glad you were in the meeting and able to get this secret information which wasn’t included in the article you posted.


17 posted on 06/23/2011 1:41:16 PM PDT by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: ransomnote

Or maybe you just didn’t notice: “World Meteorological Organization” is not the IAEA.

The WMO is the group that said they didn’t get the information they needed on radiation releases, and therefore could not do their modelling. Of course, that also was a report about something that happened in the past, not a current complaint.

But it wasn’t the IAEA saying they didn’t get information for their review, it was during their review that they found out that the WMO didn’t get the information they needed.

It seems you are confusing the collection of data for the review with the data that they collected IN the review.


18 posted on 06/23/2011 1:43:32 PM PDT by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson