Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Did anybody see Ben Stein with Laura Ingraham on O'Reilly tonight? (Vanity)

Posted on 06/29/2011 9:04:14 PM PDT by conservativebuckeye

Ben Stein was on with Laura Ingraham, who was filling in for BOR. He was on there advocating massive tax increases on the wealthy. He claimed that the greatest economic growth in our nation's history occurred when taxes on the wealthy were highest. I always thought he was a smart guy, but I guess I was wrong. Did he sleep through the 80s?


TOPICS: Business/Economy
KEYWORDS: alfranken; benstein
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-60 next last

1 posted on 06/29/2011 9:04:17 PM PDT by conservativebuckeye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: conservativebuckeye

Yep. Stein really made an ass of himself.


2 posted on 06/29/2011 9:05:44 PM PDT by xjcsa (Ridiculing the ridiculous since the day I was born.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: conservativebuckeye

he confuses correlation with the cause


3 posted on 06/29/2011 9:05:52 PM PDT by 4rcane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: conservativebuckeye

I saw it and was disgusted by how he’s become a Menshevik/Bolshevik. I used to like him.


4 posted on 06/29/2011 9:05:52 PM PDT by Borax Queen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: conservativebuckeye

I didn’t watch him because I heard he was advocating more taxes and I’m disgusted enough today.....and every day.


5 posted on 06/29/2011 9:07:21 PM PDT by unkus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: conservativebuckeye
I was shocked to hear him too. Sometimes I wonder what makes a person do a total flip-flop. Someone have dirt on him? obama needs someone to agree with him & if it's from the right ALL the media will report that the republicans are in total disagreement on taxes.
6 posted on 06/29/2011 9:07:21 PM PDT by Linda Frances
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: conservativebuckeye

He sold out long ago. I’m sure he knows the truth, but he wins points with Hollywood pals if he tells the lies on TV.


7 posted on 06/29/2011 9:07:53 PM PDT by ClearCase_guy (The USSR spent itself into bankruptcy and collapsed -- and aren't we on the same path now?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: conservativebuckeye

Also, he fails to mention that Federal spending as a percentage of GDP was lower than it is today.


8 posted on 06/29/2011 9:08:02 PM PDT by Army Air Corps (Four fried chickens and a coke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: conservativebuckeye

What’s strange, is he recently wrote an article stating that an increase on his taxes would be a punishment.


9 posted on 06/29/2011 9:08:11 PM PDT by RockinRight (Nobama 2012.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: conservativebuckeye; All

I didn’t see it but one thing everyone needs to think about is that is have the tax laws become where the wealthiest don’t pay any taxes? My guess is that is what he was trying to say.


10 posted on 06/29/2011 9:09:28 PM PDT by TwoSwords (The Lord is a man of war, Exodus 15:3)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: conservativebuckeye

How do you tax extra high the job makers and get more money or job in the economy?


11 posted on 06/29/2011 9:09:36 PM PDT by A CA Guy ( God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy

He’s become a real “limousine liberal”.


12 posted on 06/29/2011 9:09:43 PM PDT by unkus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: RockinRight
What’s strange, is he recently wrote an article stating that an increase on his taxes would be a punishment.

Well for him I'll make an exception on higher taxes because he deserves some punishment for the bs arguments he was using tonight.

13 posted on 06/29/2011 9:10:16 PM PDT by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: RockinRight

There are still a lot of Ben Stein fans around FR...

They seem to forget that he was all-in for Al Franken...


14 posted on 06/29/2011 9:11:34 PM PDT by ButThreeLeftsDo (FreeRepublic.com. Now, More Than Ever.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: conservativebuckeye

I’ve seen this idiot Stein on “The CBS Sunday Morning” show a number of times the last several years.

Stein’s conversion to moon-battery happened some time ago.
He once said, “Raise taxes on the rich.....the government needs the money.” Yeah, right. The guy is a friggin’ nut.


15 posted on 06/29/2011 9:11:34 PM PDT by july4thfreedomfoundation (Palin / West in 2012 or West / Palin. Either combination will serve America well.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: conservativebuckeye

Ben sounded like he sold out or perhaps The Messiah has one of his kids in a tight spot. I used to like the guy.


16 posted on 06/29/2011 9:14:50 PM PDT by Rembrandt (.. AND the donkey you rode in on.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: conservativebuckeye
Not that bad.

See the video here.

17 posted on 06/29/2011 9:15:38 PM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: conservativebuckeye

The truly “Wealthy” don’t pay taxes in the sense people refer too, and never have. Just like corporations, they simply pass on the cost of doing business to someone else, or incorporate, or set up a trust.They are those with the means to not only avert taxation, but are, in fact, those who write the tax laws.

The (rapidly eroding) middle class really pays all of the taxes (production class if you will). I suppose some could say that the “rich” pay taxes, but that depends on where you end middle class, and upperclass, and wealthy.

Claiming that one can “tax the wealthy” is like chasing the pot of gold at the end of the rainbow. The truly wealthy are those who are doing the taxing. Just like the original concept of an income tax was meant to be upon the wealthy, the elite wrote not only the tax code, and the loopholes to allow themselves to incorporate (in order not be subject to the taxes), they convinced people to support the taxes that winded up only harming themselves.

By far and large, the sword of justice is foisted upon those who are trying to impose their own “justice” on someone else. Hence the lower class remains in the sullied state, because they are too busy trying to impose regulations on the elite, that they only end up hurting themselves, and the middle class suffers the collateral damage.


18 posted on 06/29/2011 9:16:06 PM PDT by JDW11235 (I think I got it now!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TwoSwords

“I didn’t see it but one thing everyone needs to think about is that is have the tax laws become where the wealthiest don’t pay any taxes? My guess is that is what he was trying to say.”

Oh really. So, TwoSwords, who do YOU think pays the majority of the taxes in the U.S.? Minorities and single mothers?


19 posted on 06/29/2011 9:18:08 PM PDT by Rembrandt (.. AND the donkey you rode in on.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: RockinRight

“What’s strange, is he recently wrote an article stating that an increase on his taxes would be a punishment.”

I have to look up the segment, but when liberals use the term “wealthy” they mean “elites” not upper middle class, so he probably doesn’t correlate that his statement could include himself.


20 posted on 06/29/2011 9:20:31 PM PDT by JDW11235 (I think I got it now!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: conservativebuckeye

He could write a check to BHO if he is so sure taxes should be raised. If he gave 95% of his money (gross) I’m sure he could stand up and lead the rest of the “rich”.


21 posted on 06/29/2011 9:22:28 PM PDT by Calif4Palin (President Palin sounds so good....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rembrandt; TwoSwords

TwoSwords is correct, the elites don’t pay much in the way of taxes. It’s the middle class who bears the tax burden, and the Chinese. The chinese (and other countries to a lesser extent) have been subsidizing the artificial U.S. Government way of life for years. Let’s not forget we’re running TRILLIONS in defecits, and that it’s being paid for by foreigners.


22 posted on 06/29/2011 9:22:57 PM PDT by JDW11235 (I think I got it now!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: conservativebuckeye

Sure Ben, lets just drive the last remaining hope for our recovery, people who still have some wealth right out of the country.


23 posted on 06/29/2011 9:24:16 PM PDT by Bullish (The golfer takes all the credit and gives the jet fighter pilot all the blame.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: conservativebuckeye
Maybe he's hoping some Hollywood producer will give him another TV show.


24 posted on 06/29/2011 9:24:34 PM PDT by smoothsailing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JDW11235

” Just like corporations, they simply pass on the cost of doing business ..”

And does that account for many Europeans having relocated to Monte Carlo to avoid confiscatory taxation in their own countries? Or is all that just semantics also? How about all the tax havens in the Caribbean - window dressing?


25 posted on 06/29/2011 9:25:02 PM PDT by Rembrandt (.. AND the donkey you rode in on.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Rembrandt

The extreme rich put their money into trusts. The tax laws are very different. Reminds me of the 80’s. Maybe you weren’t there.


26 posted on 06/29/2011 9:27:10 PM PDT by TwoSwords (The Lord is a man of war, Exodus 15:3)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: conservativebuckeye

“He claimed that the greatest economic growth in our nation’s history occurred when taxes on the wealthy were highest”

Taxes that no one actually paid because of all the deductions that were available at the time. Very few people back then actually qualified for those high tax brackets.


27 posted on 06/29/2011 9:27:25 PM PDT by ScottfromNJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rembrandt

Taxation is a global problem. There are too many people everywhere who think someone owes them something, whether it be the peasants chanting for bread and circuses, or the elites, wanting monuments and mausoleums built to them for their tax sheltered “benevolence.”

Less government on every level would result in a better state for everyone.


28 posted on 06/29/2011 9:28:53 PM PDT by JDW11235 (I think I got it now!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Rembrandt
You miss the whole point by misunderstanding our tax system is on earned income by wage earners, capital gains is way less than high bracket wage earners, also FICA is now not limited for those earners either...

Stein wants a flat tax really, and was playing devils advocate to Laura so she could kick the ideas out the park...he is doing his job and Laura better do hers, just as we better do ours and vote a true conservative fiscal candidate into office...

29 posted on 06/29/2011 9:29:09 PM PDT by Turborules (`)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: conservativebuckeye

He was channeling his daddy, Nixon’s economic advisor. How did that turn out?

His hypocrisy is that he’ll advocate it and use himself, rich, as an argument. But he’ll then write on his “diary” at American Spectator how he’s so hurting and how much everything costs, etc.

All while owning about 3-4 homes, staying in 4 star hotels, etc.

He’s one of those 50/50 guys.


30 posted on 06/29/2011 9:35:30 PM PDT by Fledermaus (Mitt Romney makes Nelson Rockefeller look like Ronald Reagan. NO MITT 2012.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JDW11235

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FAtJaJf1mUI


31 posted on 06/29/2011 9:36:24 PM PDT by smokingfrog ( sleep with one eye open ( <o> ---)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: 4rcane
he confuses correlation with the cause

Exactly! A logical fallacy known as "Post hoc, ergo propter hoc."

Regards,

32 posted on 06/29/2011 9:37:10 PM PDT by alexander_busek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Turborules

“You miss the whole point by misunderstanding our tax system is on earned income by wage earners...”

OK Turborules, you’re the genius. Give me the answer to my question, why have so many high earners sought ways to avoid confiscatory taxes, whether the Caribbean or Monte Carlo or wherever? You must be a liberal.


33 posted on 06/29/2011 9:37:25 PM PDT by Rembrandt (.. AND the donkey you rode in on.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: conservativebuckeye
He claimed that the greatest economic growth in our nation's history occurred when taxes on the wealthy were highest.

This is true. But it is not true that it happened when "tax rates" were the highest.

34 posted on 06/29/2011 9:41:53 PM PDT by oldbrowser (Breitbart for a Pulitzer Prize)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smokingfrog

Thank you very much! I saw a 2 min clip, but I knew there was something missing from it. Thanks again. I’ll watch it in a few minutes.

I have to say though, that from the small clip I did hear, ala “We had growth in the 40’s. 50’s and 60’s” mentions nothing of the fact that at that time, nothing was similar to today. The U.S. was on a gold standard, much of the industrialized world’s manufacturing base has been bombed into oblivion, and we weren’t facing the regulation stranglehold on productivity we are now.

The clip I heard said only that high taxes weren’t correlated with stunted economic growth, but there appears to be a lot more to the conversation than that one segment. Thank you again for the link!


35 posted on 06/29/2011 9:42:31 PM PDT by JDW11235 (I think I got it now!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: oldbrowser

It also ignores a plethora of other factors that constitute a greater economic picture.


36 posted on 06/29/2011 9:44:14 PM PDT by JDW11235 (I think I got it now!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: JDW11235

Also in the 40s 50s & 60s you didn’t have a lot of 2-income families. As more and more women have entered the workplace, there are more workers paying taxes but wages are probably lower too. Laura correctly points out that we have a spending problem, mainly due to entitlements. If they were raising taxes to pay down the debt that would be one thing, but they just want more money for more handouts.


37 posted on 06/29/2011 9:57:52 PM PDT by smokingfrog ( sleep with one eye open ( <o> ---)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Borax Queen
This might explain some of it:

. . . . Stein graduated from Montgomery Blair High School in 1961 along with classmate journalist Carl Bernstein; actress Goldie Hawn (class of 1963) was two years behind. Actor Sylvester Stallone was a schoolmate at Montgomery Hills Junior High School. . . .

38 posted on 06/29/2011 10:03:50 PM PDT by skeptoid (The road to serfdom is being paved by RINOs, and Lisa Murkowski is their mascot.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: oldbrowser
It is true that tax rates were the highest in our history. However, back in those days there were tax shelters all over the place. The rates were high, but nobody actually paid them. The rich barely paid any taxes. Reagan ended this in the 80’s. Liberals have this fantasy that rates can buy something. Only actual money collected can. Something tells me that the super rich want to go back to those days, and that is why the super rich support the Democrats. That way they can fund the liberals campaigns in exchange for what ever tax shelters they want. The liberals than tell their dummie base how they are socking it to the rich. In the mean time, us in the middle will be hammered with higher taxes and higher prices.
39 posted on 06/29/2011 10:04:23 PM PDT by gusty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: xjcsa

I think Ben has had a brain fart.


40 posted on 06/29/2011 10:23:25 PM PDT by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: conservativebuckeye

Ben Stein is usually pretty sane. This was a major brain fart.

Just think of Herb Stein and price controls during the Nixon Presidency. The Father wrote the policy and the Son wrote the words. LOL


41 posted on 06/29/2011 10:32:14 PM PDT by Reagan Man ("In this present crisis, government is not the solution to our problem; government is the problem.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Borax Queen

He’s been advocating higher taxes for years.


42 posted on 06/29/2011 10:33:11 PM PDT by mimaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: conservativebuckeye

I think everybody forgets sometimes that there are 40% of Americans who PAY NO TAXES WHATSOEVER!...39% of those get three times their money back by filing earned income. And that the upper tax brackets already pays 49% of ALL the taxes paid in this country.

And lest you forget, there’s not a dime of taxes paid in this country that the wealthy didn’t have to risk their money to earn first and share that wealth with their employees for an honest day’s work. Remind yourself that the money you pay your taxes with was first EARNED by the wealthy’s innovation and without them you don’t have a pot to pixx in. Unless of course you’ve created your own company and your own product to sell, which gives you all the protections that the wealthy have in those tax loopholes.

Government employees don’t even have a frarking dime that somebody else didn’t earn first.

I happen to love the wealthy. The wealthier they are, there’s more opportunity for me to make a good comfortable living doing an honest days work, and earn with them. And I refuse to play the hate games that liberals play while pretending they don’t know where the HELL their own money comes from. Especially the leeches in Washington, DC and government jobs.

If wealthy liberals in Hollyweird want to rant because other capitalists just like them make the majority of their money off the middle class, we can certainly fix their tax bracket by not buying the bang, bang, shoot ‘em up and porn flicks and raunchy music. Otherwise, if they think they’re not taxed enough, they are certainly able to write an extra check to the government and send it in at anytime they want to.


43 posted on 06/29/2011 10:47:29 PM PDT by RowdyFFC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rembrandt
your the Genius, you missed my point too...if you want to climb down to lowly me...the whole tax system is rigged to the rich, and always be! Unless we clear the stage with a tax system based on consumption...hell, I was trained in accounting and finance, and all I loved was cost accounting...you see cost accounting is about profits and how to make the best ROI
Tax accounting is about how best to secure the profits for the owners and the future existence of the business in very simple terms...

I hated tax accounting, but you can't make big money that way, because you disrupt so many money carts...

I do have many reasons to state this truth as the biggest problem with American tax system... believe me the little guy still is earning less than a Million... I did not mean to offend you, only our crude tax system that makes it so easy to not see why it is so one sided

44 posted on 06/29/2011 10:59:41 PM PDT by Turborules (`)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: conservativebuckeye
Stein donated to Animal Frankin so I've written him off years ago....

the rich I could care less about...but if Stein says to tax them more, than I think the opposite should be done...

45 posted on 06/29/2011 11:04:02 PM PDT by cherry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JDW11235

No, he has said many times that he himself should pay much higher taxes


46 posted on 06/29/2011 11:15:30 PM PDT by Kellis91789 (There's a reason the mascot of the Democratic Party is a jackass.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: smokingfrog

Ok, now I finally finished the clip you sent me, and I have to say I disagree with most of what Ben Steain said. That having been said, I have to say that he is correct that a low tax rate does not necessarilly mean there will be economic growth, but I have to qualify that.

I’ll use the term “Economic freedom.” Economic freedom (which includes less or no taxation), is what allows for an economic growth. A person, or society, must be industrious and have incentive to be industrious to be prosperous. So, if there is more taxation, there is less economic freedom because people cannot keep their money, and thus, an economic downturn. However, you can lower the tax rate to zero and still have no economic growth. This could be due to regulation or a number of other factors (resources, etc.). Increased regulation and control (permits, EPA nazi policies, denied leases, zoning, on and on) also stifle economic freedom. So, while I agree that a low tax rate is beneficial to economic growth, it is not the only factor.

Hence, with less regulation, or a sky high demand (as I mentioned in the mid 1900’s, we had the manufacturing base to cater to the world, and the demand to buy our goods—now neither is in our favor), we could still have growth amid high taxation. However, we have ZERO favorable conditions going for us at this time, so I agree that lowering the tax rate would not necessarily paint a better economic picture (frankly, the U.S. economy as it is is toast, because it’s only based on foreign subsidization of our gov.).

We have a whole mess of problems, and I can guarantee that a higher tax rate will solve none of them. What the U.S. needs is economic freedom, and that includes a lot less taxes. In other times, we may have been able to live with them, with other factors offsetting them, but right now we can’t afford ANYTHING stiffling what’s left of the sinking economy.


47 posted on 06/29/2011 11:25:14 PM PDT by JDW11235 (I think I got it now!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: JDW11235

The top 1% of income earners paid $400B in Federal Income Tax in 2008, out of $2.5T income. And that doesn’t even count the portion of the $300B in corporate taxes that could be attributed to them as shareholders in corporations. You consider that “not much” in taxes. 1% of the people paying 40% of the income tax is somehow “not much” ? This 1% earns only 20% of all income, but pays 40% of the income tax, while 50% of the people pay NOTHING. You need to go to IRS.gov and look at the tax stats before you spout such nonsense as “the elites don’t pay much in the way of taxes”.


48 posted on 06/29/2011 11:28:30 PM PDT by Kellis91789 (There's a reason the mascot of the Democratic Party is a jackass.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: RowdyFFC

“Government employees don’t even have a frarking dime that somebody else didn’t earn first.”

Bingo, and at all levels, Federal, state and local. I read (but am unable to find the link), that between all federal, state and local governmental employees and those paid by government contracts, 7 of 12 in the workforce are considered “Government” employees. I dunno if it is true, but based on just a few numbers, I think it likely. When you factor in the millions of Teachers, Military, and Police/Fire, they add up into the millions, for just 3 groups (Workforce is over 100 Million). Let alone city works, administrators, lawyers, and on and on.

If true (debatable, but I believe it), then each producer is paying for himself/herself and another person and a half. I cannot fathom the prosperity our country would have if everyone was producing and not mooching. It would be hardly the world we live in at all.


49 posted on 06/29/2011 11:35:44 PM PDT by JDW11235 (I think I got it now!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Kellis91789

$400B/2.5T= 16%. Also, it’s paid after all expenditures, unlike those who are paying it on their income, and not through corporation tax sheltering.

I’m not unfamiliar with statistics. And the 50% who pay no federal income tax are paying oodles through opportunity cost. End all entitlements, and create only a consumption based tax, with NO allowances/deductions or credits, and eliminate all government spending, and you’ll create freedom. Until then, the elites (ala George Soros) merely manipulate the ignorant into thinking the politicians are cause of the problems.


50 posted on 06/29/2011 11:41:56 PM PDT by JDW11235 (I think I got it now!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-60 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson