Al Jazeera ... Naomi Wolfe??
..is Naomi Wolf a media whore working for Al Jazeera.
It’s been around in different forms for thousands of years. Look at India and their Kama Sutra images as an example. The internet just makes it easier to view it.
Pornography has nothing on Free Republic in terms of a dopamine rush.
Some few years ago The New York Post did a study on porno and found 22% of people who view it are women.
There is no such peer reviewed science that even comes close to showing cause-effect.
Pornography is evil and destructive (to people, families, marriages and the culture). (so is Al Jazeera)
Today, Weiner Tweets pics of his johnson..Back in the day, Wilbur Mills gets a load on, has a traffic accident while driving drunk, with his mistress, an Argentinian stripper stage-named Fannie Foxe, in the car with him..panics..jumps OUT of the car, and INTO the nearby Tidal Basin...
Best of all, he did NOT resign from Congress..indeed, kept on as chairman of Ways & Means...the most important committee in the House, and..wait for it.....was actually RE-ELECTED to the House a few months later..
Nonsense. Utter sexual anarchy is perfectly healthy. Ask any leftist.
I think Naiomi Wolf is just mad because nobody wants nekkid pix of her.
Sounds like we need the gubmint to step in and regulate this - it’s addictive, and we can’t have that. Oh, No....it’s probably going to be called a mental illness, public health threat...in no time, libs will be requiring health insurance to cover treatment of this...
“Flee fornication. Every sin that a man doeth is without the body; but he that committeth fornication sinneth against his own body.” (I Corinthians 6:18)
I think there is a certain age (I dont know what it is maybe 30 something) where people live an abundance of their lives via technology/internet/facebook/twitter/text message and for some reason they might to the things referred to in this article. As for porn addiction, having so much of it available online for free can be very controlling and cause one to develop some habitual holes they may have a real trouble digging out of (a long time ago some one called this sin). Another part of me thinks that its not so much a porn addiction but rather so many have a need to just be constantly entertained. Perhaps this explains why you see people constantly yapping on their cell phones about literally nothing or staring obsessively at their i-phones or watching huge hours of television. The idea of just walking without the entertainment or doing a little thing called intropection just isn't something people do anymore and maybe they should.
I do not look at it. I would suspect that a person that frequently looks at it has psychological problems.
Years ago she did this same routine in NY Magazine
It gave me the creeps. The way she described her Orthodox Jewish friend was disrespectful and unseemly. But I suppose for a socialist/commie Naomi was as compassionate and understand as all get-out. For someone totally kalshebekalim.
I know I've always been discreet.
Hey, Tiger! Wait up.
It takes an act of will and divine intervention to resist it.
Young boys are interested in pornography first and foremost because they do not understand female anatomy. This is preadolescent curiosity.
It is also a warning sign that boys and girls are in need of chaperoned socialization that neither permits them to gender segregate nor is so filled with other distractions that they cannot socialize. There is no such common system in the US, and certainly not in school or in church, because the children are otherwise preoccupied.
Which explains a lot about gender and relationship problems among adults. Cross gender socialization is essential at a young age.
The next time boys are attracted to pornography is when they are in the throes of adolescence, “all hormones and nerve endings”, where pornography enables what could be called “excessive” masturbation.
Finally, when adult men are married, there are times, from days to decades, when they cannot express sexuality with their spouse, either because she isn’t interested or available, or he isn’t.
I dunno. Good question. Pity we can't ask Bin Laden - he had lots - may be that explains his attitude.