Skip to comments.Casey Anthony plans to appeal convictions for lying
Posted on 07/15/2011 11:02:20 AM PDT by markomalley
Casey Anthony will appeal her convictions on four charges of lying to detectives who investigated the 2008 disappearance and death of her 2-year-old daughter Caylee, according to a notice filed on Friday by her criminal defense attorneys.
The defamation lawsuit was filed in 2008 but put on hold during the criminal proceedings. Fernandez-Gonzalez's lawyers this week asked for an emergency order to compel Anthony to appear at the deposition, telling the judge they were concerned she would disappear after her release from jail.
Greene countered with a motion for an emergency protective order, arguing that Anthony was emotionally and mentally exhausted by the seven-week criminal trial and has had no time to prepare for her defense in the defamation case.
At a court hearing Friday morning, Greene immediately asked Judge Jose Rodriguez for a private bench conference.
When it was over, Rodriguez announced he would step down from the case and adjourned the hearing. Neither Greene nor Keith Mitnik, who represents Fernandez-Gonzalez, would discuss what transpired in the private discussion with the judge.
Mitnik said Anthony's deposition is still on.
"What was accomplished today in my opinion is she's now going to get out of jail, and we've got to wait and see if she shows up," Mitnik said.
(Excerpt) Read more at reuters.com ...
This story is a bit like a train wreck.
But it would be interesting to see what happened in that conference to cause the judge to recuse himself.
This is just a shrewd legal maneuver to allow her to refuse to answer questions in a deposition. She knows the convictions will not be reversed.
Casey & Bambi, which one is the worst liar?????
Shrewd how? To forestall further legal actions by anyone? Thats interesting.
I was thinking she should just go away and stfu...
This poor girl has been to Hell and back. I hope she finds some peace and receives some money for 3 years of being in prison for nothing. God bless Casey for the witch trials she has had to endure.
Casey Anthony is safe from prosecution for the murder of her child so I guess she feels empowered. However, if her statements to the police were recorded and were demonstrably false, I can’t see the basis for the appeal unless her attorneys have some technical legal ploy that they are counting on. The judge recusing himself may be a clue but I don’t know what to make of it. Like Casey Anthony herself, this latest move is a bit odd.
It’s a tie.
Talk about chumming the water...
Funniest thing I’ve seen all day.
You have GOT to be kidding.
That was a good one.
I don’t think so. The comment is so incredibly stupid it’s not even worth commenting, or copying the poster, on.
It is actually shrewd. The defamation lawsuit depends on statements for which she was found guilty in the criminal trial. Her lawyers can block key aspects of discovery by claiming that the criminal case is ongoing.
Yes, poor thing. Just think, if she hadn’t been in jail these past 3 years, how many more babies she could have had and killed. Don’t worry though, she’ll be getting out soon and she can get started on it.
Casey’s own lawyer (Baez), quoted the prosecution in his closing arguments calling her a liar and a slut. Maybe he’s just going to say he was mistaken...she’s just a slut.
Baez, Casey’s lawyer, in his closing arguments, quoted and showed agreement with the prosecution that his client was a liar and a slut. Maybe he’s going to say he was mistaken...she’s just a slut????
They are going to appeal the lying to police on Miranda. In any civil trial she can take the 5th while the appeal is ongoing. Oj was not appealing anything.
This poor girl has been to Hell and back
If the jury weren’t such idiots the “poor girl” wouldn’t of come back from “hell”.
If you want to show your pity show it for her daughter. Remember....the little girl she left in a plastic bag like garbage.
You are kidding right? Did you even watch the trial?
It is a Hell she created herself. She deserved to be in jail and was even given credit for time served.
God will damn Casey, not bless her, for the murder of her child.
She will disappear and probably end up murdered somewhere. No one will think much about it since everyone is expecting her to disappear and change her name.
With her behavior, pattern of lying and notoriety, she is a perfect target for a serial killer.
I think the ploy is her attys needed to get the appeals filed so Casey can plead the 5th in the deposition.
Please tell me you forgot your sarcasm tag.
Where the heck have you been?....Do you know nothing about this girl or the trial?
They are going to appeal the lying to police on Miranda. In any civil trial she can take the 5th while the appeal is ongoing.
- - - - - - -
IIRC, lying to police during an investigation/obstruction of justice does not have a Miranda requirement. It is weather or not she believed she was under arrest at the time she made the false statements.
As far as her deposition, it doesn’t matter if she pleads the fifth or not, civil trials only require a ‘more likely than not’ burden of proof and there is ample proof outside of her statement, comments by her mother, comments to the police, trial transcripts. Although, her pleading the fifth won’t help her defense in the civil trial.
Any thoughts on this, MrR?
I am not sure because I am not a Lawyer. But suing an indigent is not a really good idea. The main thing they are after is her testimony and publicity. If she can not be compelled to testify why bother except for the publicity.
How can these charges be appealed? Denial of Miranda rights? Police sat she was not under arrest (at least initially) so those rights did not need to be given. If Anthony denies she lied to police she will be lying again. I think she is no longer able to tell the truth about anything.
Heck, she’s still in jail and women who have a vague resemblance to her are being endangered!
Just read your bio, where you say you are “very pro life”. I find that a very insincere statement, that you would condone killing unborn kids, but think it’s ok for that trashy Anthony woman killing her little live baby girl. Even if she didn’t kill her, she had so little concern for her that she didn’t report her missing while she was out bar-hopping and whoring for days.
Hence the ping to my husband, he is a lawyer. I’m just his paralegal.
They are after money, and probably attachment of any book deals or movies Casey will try to get (already heard about a movie deal).
It doesn’t matter if she testifies or not, a judge or jury can still find her culpable in defaming Zandia Gonzalez. Had Casey been smart, she would have called the nanny Maria Lopez or something really common.
They are pushing for a deposition to avoid the setting aside of any judgement against her. Casey’s team is doing this to delay the civil trial. Typical lawyer posturing.
Guess she didn’t see the “Dont Talk to Cops” video on youtube.
shes still in jail and women who have a vague resemblance to her are being endangered!
- - - - —
Good thing I’m a short blonde.
(Dispatcher): What is your emergency?
(Anthony): Please help me, I have a bunch of people trying to kill me.
(Dispatcher): Okay ma'am, calm down. What is your name?
(Anthony): Casey Anthony.
(Dispatcher): Okay, Miss Anthony, try to stay calm, an officer will be there in 31 days .
It’s not too shrewd. Refusal to answer questions, even claiming constitutional privilege, can be considered by a civil jury as self incriminating.
So she can take the fifth instead of answering questions. If the appeal is pending she can do that.
The equivalent of “I’m personally going to find the real murderer”
Oh man, I love it! Add this:
(Dispatcher): What’s that? Your location? Oh don’t worry, someone will find you eventually.
“But suing an indigent is not a really good idea.”
Judging by her family and her own proclivity towards manipulating the media for their own advantage, I doubt she will be indigent for very long.
Well. Sue her then. Why sue a jailbird with no dough. That would be like suing a broke burglar doing 6 mo. in county.
I have more than a vague resemblance to her, but I'm not a woman!
I actually was in Orlando for the trial and space shuttle.
It’s Her! She had plastic surgery! Get Her! TX that is way too cool.
home About Our Founder Cases screamingforsunshine Case Law Updates Papers Press
Wrongful Executions: Fail-Safe Judicial Systems Do Fail
Posted by Chuck on December 16th, 2009 No Comments Printer-Friendly
By Gretchen Cothron
Forensic Research Consultant
Throughout the history of capital punishment in the United States, innocent people have been wrongfully convicted and executed. U.S. Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia opined in State v. Marsh that, the dissent does not discuss a single case not one in which it is clear that a person was executed for a crime he did not commit. If such an event had occurred in recent years, we would not have to hunt for it; the innocents name would be shouted from the rooftops by the abolition lobby. However, the context of Scalias quote is clearly not in alignment with reality. While the Supreme Court has yet to admit that America has indeed executed innocent people, citizens can no longer rest assured that the criminal justice system and, particularly, capital punishment are fail safe.
There are numerous documented cases that within our borders, authorities have executed factually innocent persons dating as far back as the Salem Witch Trials of 1692. Research of the records(1) from colonial America show that 19 innocent people were hung and one person was horrifically pressed to death. In addition, 4 innocent persons died in prison for certain, while 13 others are believed to have died in prison, but sources conflict on that exact number.
In 1977, Massachusetts Governor Michael Dukakis signed a proclamation declaring, Any stigma and disgrace should be forever removed from the names of Nicola Sacco and Bartolomeo Vanzetti(2) we are not here to decide whether these men are guilty or innocent we are here to say that the high standards of justice, which we in Massachusetts take such pride in, failed Sacco and Vanzetti. This proclamation excited much controversy over the long-questioned case as to whether the two men were guilty of a 1921 robbery-murder. We may never know whether Sacco and Vanzetti were guilty or innocent, but the handgun alleged to have been used in the Sacco-Vanzetti murder had ballistic tests run as late as 1961, alluding to Saccos possible guilt and Vanzettis possible innocence.
For professionals working in the field of criminal justice, the number of posthumous exonerations hangs heavy on their minds. A 2004 study by Samuel Gross(3) found four cases of posthumous exonerations between 1989 and 2004. Since Gross study, at least one other person has been exonerated after death; Timothy Cole was posthumously exonerated earlier this year by Texas judge Charlie Baird. In my current research into probable innocents that have been executed, I have uncovered at least 74 cases in which wrongful executions have most likely taken place.
Discussions within the media and in criminology conferences have noted that posthumous exoneration numbers appear to be very small in comparison to the whole number of documented executions that have taken place in the United States. Possibly the most prominent reason is the difficulty of gaining access to cases after an inmate has been executed. In most cases, all case files and evidence are destroyed following an execution.
According to the Death Penalty Information Center(4), there were approximately 14,489 documented government executions prior to the 1972 Furman(5) moratorium, and there have been 1,188 additional executions since 1976, when the moratorium was overturned. Focusing in more detail on this post-1976 time period, there have been 139 death row exonerations (Innocence(6), 2009), an estimated 39 innocents executed (Executing(7), 2009), and 5 posthumous exonerations (Gross, 2004; & Ryan(8), 2009). The last year for which total death-row population is available was 2007; as of year-end, the Department of Justice listed 3,220 persons on death row in the United States (Capital(9), 2009). Calculating the ratio percentage for the number of actual exonerations (139), versus the number of actual executions (1188), yields the figure 11.7%. This extrapolation leads to a somewhat blurry statistic that may delineate some measure of the possible mistakes being made in capital cases and executions.
When examining cases of possible wrongful execution, it is necessary to delve deeply into them in order to form a basic understanding of what mistakes were causative. Once found, these identified mistakes form the basis to address related problems in the judicial system. Ultimately, reformers are then better equipped to promote changes that ensure an even better system of American justice.
Current research based on examination of numerous cases has highlighted for me one terrifying aspect of the criminal justice system: the near impossibility to prove innocence after conviction. Many factors attribute to a wrongful conviction: mistaken eyewitness identification, now-debunked forensic science, untruthful snitches and informants, impotent defense attorneys, and overzealous police and prosecutors. But once these factors are discovered and brought up in a court of law after an erroneous conviction, there remains a horrendous maze of insurmountable mountains that advocacy groups and attorneys must traverse before an innocent person can be released from prison.
In the course of my research, I have read many articles dealing with opposing viewpoints on the death penalty. Yet very few of these articles expressed the view that state- and country-sanctioned killing of innocent people is acceptable. Since it has unquestionably been proven that innocent people do indeed die on death row, should Americans continue to support the death penalty?
This research into probable wrongful executions began as an attempt to understand how innocent people can fall through the cracks in the capital punishment process, but it has lead to far more questions than it has answered for the author. For example, why do prosecutors refuse DNA testing for an inmate for whom death is imminent? Why do judges refuse to remand cases where upwards of 90% of the evidence has been recanted, debunked, or otherwise proven faulty? Why do governors, the so-called gatekeepers protecting the so-called fail-safe capital punishment system, allow evidence files from acclaimed experts sit on their desk while a very-probably innocent human is executed by the very state that the governor vowed to honor and protect?
The next turn in this course of reforming the criminal justice system must address the difficulties of righting a wrongful conviction. And, additional system reforms need to be put in place that will assist truly innocent people to escape the machinery of death, rather than pushing them to their untimely end.
About the Author: Our guest commentator, Gretchen Cothron, is a forensic consultant who researches wrongful convictions, and provides information to organizations such as The Innocence Project, as well as to individual attorneys. As a senior at the University of Tampa, majoring in criminology and law & justice, she is currently working on a research fellowship, attempting to create a searchable database of cases of wrongful convictions. She has also given presentations on wrongful convictions to the American Society of Criminology, the Southeastern Criminal Justice Association and the National Collegiate Honors Conference. Miss Cothron can be reached at firstname.lastname@example.org .
1. Salem Witch Trials:
Sutter, T. Victims of the Salem witch trials of 1962, Salemwitchtrials.com, retrieved on:
10.29.09 from: http://www.salemwitchtrials.com/victims.html
2. Sacco and Vanzetti:
Watson, B. (2007). Sacco and Vanzetti: the men, the murders, and the judgment of
mankind. Viking. P.365, Retrieved 10.8.09 from:
3. The 2004 study by Samuel Gross
Gross, S., et al. (2004). Exonerations in the United States, 1989-2003. University ofMichigan. Retrieved 10.22.09 from: http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/Publications/abstract.aspx?ID=206150
4. Execution statistics:
5. What was the Furman moratorium?
Furman v. State of Georgia, 408 U.S. 238 (1972) [the case in which the Supreme Court ruled that the death penalty was cruel and unusual, thus enacting the moratorium until it was overturned by Gregg v. Georgia , 428 U.S. 153 (1976)] Furman: http://www.oyez.org/cases/19701979/1971/1971_69_5003 Gregg: http://www.oyez.org/cases/1970-1979/1975/1975_74_6257
6. Innocence 2009
Innocence List (2009). Death Penalty Information Center. Retrieved 11.3.09 from: http://www.deathpenaltyinfo.org/innocence-list-those-freed-death-row
7. Executing 2009
Executing the innocent (2009). Northwestern University School of Law. Retrieved 11.20.09 from http://www.law.northwestern.edu/wrongfulconvictions/issues/deathpenalty/executinginnocent/
8. Gross, 2004 & Ryan, 2009
Gross is listed above.
Ryan. (2009). Timothy Cole exonerated in Texas. Innocence Project of Florida. Retrieved 11.4.09 from: http://floridainnocence.org/content/?p=519
9. Capital, 2009
Capital punishment statistics (2009). U.S. Department of Justice. Retrieved 11.3.09 from:
© 2009 Created by Distant Journey Consulting
Entries (RSS) Comments (RSS)
Monday, December 28, 2009
Did you forget your sarcasm tag?