Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

America's Last Major Athletic Shoe Manufacturer Can't Survive Free-Trade Agreement With Vietnam
Business Insider ^ | 07/29/2011 | Gus Lubin

Posted on 07/29/2011 8:29:16 AM PDT by SeekAndFind

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-46 next last
To: SeekAndFind
"Oh, well, that's just great, we still have to worry about them killing us."
21 posted on 07/29/2011 9:26:34 AM PDT by de.rm ('Most people never believe anything you tell them unless it isn't true."-Groucho Marx)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: de.rm

“Exactly how does one go about surviving on $10/hr., seriously, I’m curious.”

I’m sure it meant that $10/hr. is the minimum starting. A LOT of factory jobs (non-union) start at that, or less. But raises can be pretty often (at least the first couple) and good. Union rates, IMO, are exhorbitant, unrealistic, unfair, and responsible in large part, for the demise of several of our once great American industries - rail, auto, steel, etc.

Lowering tax rates would make things better for everyone.


22 posted on 07/29/2011 9:35:30 AM PDT by llandres (Forget the "New America" - restore the original one!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Natural Law

“As long as Joe Sixpack price shops at Walmart American companies have to outsource to survive.”

Not if Joe Sixpack would refuse to buy any Chinese-manufactured products from wherever he happens to shop.


23 posted on 07/29/2011 9:40:17 AM PDT by IWONDR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: puppypusher

According to the Free Trade™ dogma, it doesn’t make sense to manufacture ANYTHING in the USA. Their mantra is “Let turd world slaves do it”0 Then those same Free Traders will complain when those 10 buck/hr former NB employees go on the dole. THe tariff was a better deal. It is a sicko world.


24 posted on 07/29/2011 9:49:02 AM PDT by central_va ( I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

That would be really bad news for Skowhegan.


25 posted on 07/29/2011 9:49:55 AM PDT by smokingfrog ( sleep with one eye open ( <o> ---)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: econjack

“I guess the question is: Do consumers want to subsidize the NB employees?”

That’s exactly what happened in the auto industry going WAY back. GM was a prime example. Look at how many thousands of $ were part of the car price due to union salary and benefit demands, going back decades.


26 posted on 07/29/2011 9:54:06 AM PDT by llandres (Forget the "New America" - restore the original one!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: econjack

It’s more complicated then that.

If having a trade agreement allows Boeing to sell just 1 more 787 to Vietnam then dozens of small family run machine shops around the country get to deliver another ship set of aircraft parts and maybe make a few thousand more profit.

There just might be more economic benefit in selling expensive high tech things then can be had from a $10M subsidy to make and sell low tech inexpensive things.


27 posted on 07/29/2011 9:59:08 AM PDT by The Free Engineer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: IWONDR

“Not if Joe Sixpack would refuse to buy any Chinese-manufactured products from wherever he happens to shop.”

But a lot of them won’t - they’re looking at cheapest price.

AND of those who do want to be patriotic and only buy American, I’ll bet the majority don’t realize that when they see all those Made in USA tags (many of which are seen at Walmart), only something like 17% of the product is required to be made here.


28 posted on 07/29/2011 10:04:35 AM PDT by llandres (Forget the "New America" - restore the original one!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: llandres
I believe in the market's ability to send signals to rational business people and consumers. If you work on an assembly line, are you really worth $50/hr plus an additional $16 in fringes? That's $132K a year. Sorry, I don't think so. If you lose your job, it's the market telling you your services are over-priced. Either lower them or look for a different job. It also sends a message to your kids...don't look here for a future job. The same is true for the NB employees. I fail to see why 500,000 consumers should subsidize 2000 workers by paying higher prices for shoes.
29 posted on 07/29/2011 10:08:10 AM PDT by econjack (Some people are dumber than soup.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: The Free Engineer

No “small family run machine shop” can compete any more with China. Can you name anything which can’t be produced more cheaply in China today, except for tort lawyers and bureaucrats?


30 posted on 07/29/2011 10:13:12 AM PDT by hellbender
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: central_va

That, and blithely ignoring the fact that people without jobs don’t purchase much of anything.


31 posted on 07/29/2011 10:16:35 AM PDT by GenXteacher (He that hath no stomach for this fight, let him depart!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
Liberal social policies and free-trade deals with communist countries drove off the manufacturing from this country, who used to produce half the world's goods. The seduction of super-low labor rates and executive pay that is over 300 times the average employee salary was just too much for the unpatriotic "businessmen", on top of having to subsidize the poor that the liberals pushed onto "welfare". Result? Dollars leaving the country never to return, and instead going to fund the leftist global "revolution" that is still very much an imperative in Red China's constitution and the constitutions of other communist countries.

BTW, back in 1950, the average hourly wage for manufacturing work in the USA was $1.44; in 2011 dollars, that's $13.49. How could we ever afford to have been on top, eh . . . ? I think some people need to re-read Alexander Hamilton's Report on Manufactures to see how all these "free trade" agreements that the liberals love so much really undermine national security.
32 posted on 07/29/2011 10:41:27 AM PDT by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Natural Law

What if we outsourced all of our manufacturing to Japan in the 1930s?


33 posted on 07/29/2011 10:44:57 AM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

RE: BTW, back in 1950, the average hourly wage for manufacturing work in the USA was $1.44; in 2011 dollars, that’s $13.49. How could we ever afford to have been on top, eh . . . ?

____________________________________________________________________________

Could it be that we just finished a world war 5 years prior, most of our potential competitors were devastated, and we were the only country left standing?

Were there any major auto manufacturing companies in 1950 other than Ford and GM for instance?


34 posted on 07/29/2011 10:48:47 AM PDT by SeekAndFind (u)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Could it be that we just finished a world war 5 years prior, most of our potential competitors were devastated, and we were the only country left standing?
No, it wasn't that. And speaking of that, we had incurred a $4.5 trillion debt due to that war (2011 dollar equivalent) and could still afford to implement things like the Marshall Plan.

Moving domestic companies offshore is not the same as facing competition from foreign companies anyhow. These free-trade agreements aren't about allowing foreign companies to compete with domestic ones.

Were there any major auto manufacturing companies in 1950 other than Ford and GM for instance?
Those companies were not exporters. Instead, they had European divisions. There were also car companies like Austin, Morris, Hillman and other British companies; back in 1950, the UK was the world's largest exporter of automobiles.
35 posted on 07/29/2011 11:00:28 AM PDT by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: llandres

Are factory workers who have been there for years, really all that much more productive than newbies?


36 posted on 07/29/2011 11:04:44 AM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: cumbo78

The majority of jobs in the US fall under the general umbrella of “entry level”. Real wages for labor in this country have cratered over the last 20 years sending millions into social assistance programs, and stampeding voters into the waiting arms of socialist demagogues like Obama.

Wages in this country are not “artificially high”. Costs of living are considerably higher in the US than overseas, and $10/hr isn’t much over subsistence level in most areas of the country after you factor in things like rent, electricity, fuel, food, and healthcare.

Waging reverse class-warfare is every bit as much a race to the bottom as socialism. Bad politics and bad economics. There are other words for entry-level workers. They’re called “consumers”, “voters”, “citizens”, and “neighbors”.


37 posted on 07/29/2011 11:09:04 AM PDT by CowboyJay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: econjack

You’re assuming wrong. NB’s competitors will only have to undercut them by $10/pr, and only until NB is out of business. At that point, they can (and will) raise their prices. Then the jobs and the tax base will be gone, as will the consumer benefit of lower prices.

So I guess the real question is whether a short-term reduction in consumer prices is worth long-term loss in jobs, GDP, and tax-base?


38 posted on 07/29/2011 11:17:23 AM PDT by CowboyJay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

I’m always amazed at how many people claim to believe in the free market until it crosses a border.

I am an American consumer. I wish to purchase something made in Mexico or China.

On what free market basis does anyone have a right to tell me I can’t spend my money as I see fit?

BTW, back in the 80s I had a job where I had to wear black “work shoes,” but due to the chemicals I worked around they didn’t last long. I bought Red Wings for about $75, if I remember right, quite a large sum at the time for me. They fit great but only lasted about 8 months.

Then Walmart started importing shoes that were under $20. They were less comfortable and lasted a little less than six months. This was the equivalent of a fairly substantial pay increase for me at the time.

Why should I have been required to pay 3x the price for shoes so Red Wing guys making more than me could keep their jobs?


39 posted on 07/29/2011 1:57:46 PM PDT by Sherman Logan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sherman Logan

RE: I am an American consumer. I wish to purchase something made in Mexico or China.

I know how you feel. But let me ask you this — how do you feel when a country protects its industry from American exports by RAISING TARIFFS on US Goods while we here in the USA do NOT reciprocate the same tariffs? Is that fair?


40 posted on 07/29/2011 3:33:20 PM PDT by SeekAndFind (u)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-46 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson