[Christian Engineer Mass]

I find a commercial search engine search, adding site:freerepublic.com can be helpful

[Tijeras_Slim]

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2712797/posts

Possibly this one.

Do a keyword search on ROE and plenty comes up.

[Elendur]

you might also check some of the military blogs.

and a few examples:
http://floppingaces.net/2010/06/21/obamas-rules-of-engagement-in-afghanistan-will-ensure-we-lose/
Obama’s Rules of Engagement In Afghanistan Will Ensure Our Failure

http://www.theusreport.com/the-us-report/2010/11/11/in-afghanistan-us-fights-taliban-and-military-roe.html

http://www.captainsjournal.com/category/rules-of-engagement/
British Soldiers Told Not To Shoot IED Emplacers

http://www.blackfive.net/main/2010/06/emasculated-roe-will-likely-continue-under-petraeus.html

http://www.mcclatchydc.com/2009/09/08/75036/were-pinned-down-4-us-marines.html

[starlifter]

Typically ROE are classified and for very good reasons.

You don't want the bad guys knowing under what conditions the good guys can and cannot shoot.

Most of what you read on FR or other sites about ROE should be taken with a very large grain of salt.

[Cicero]

I saw that, too. As I recall, troops in Afghanistan were not allowed to chamber a round until after they were shot at.

And there have been plenty of stories describing delays in air support, or even refusal of air support, when troops were out on a limb and caught in a firefight against larger numbers—because air support might result in the deaths of civilians.