Posted on 08/07/2011 3:51:14 PM PDT by urtax$@work
The real nutters are the OBots who support Obama in hiding his faux records.
“Orly Taitz “is either toying with the court or displaying her own stupidity...”
I’m betting on the latter.
*************************
Agreed. Repeated clerical errors which prevent filing?
Gross incompetence or indifference.
The "conflicting evidence" is that the Connecticut SSN was issued to someone in 1977. It's very possible that the SSN was removed from the query database.
Orly may not be another Oliver Wendell Holmes but she deserves recognition for her tireless efforts to force the courts to look at the Obama usurpation of power.
She has been wrongfully sidelined and tripped up by clerks, bueaucrats, minions and functionaries at every turn.
Her efforts have exposed a facet of the corruption in the legal system that usually remains hidden from view.
Let’s face it - the courts don’t want to deal with Obama’s illegal occupation of the White House, and in one way or another have degraded, belittled, or ignored every challenger. Orly stands out because she just keeps coming back at them.
Where are the heavy legal hitters? They are hiding from doing the right thing because they see that the political power is aligned in favor of not permitting a challenge to the system.
“Can someone tell me exactly what she did that was wrong?”
She didn’t properly redact Social Security numbers from a pleading that she filed. That’s her job, not the clerk’s.
*************************************
Exactly. When an attorney signs off on a document, that attorney OWNS it. There is the formal understanding that the attorney has read and approved every iota of the document.
“maybe they are wrong. but the courts should not
be ostructing honest efforts to find the truth.”
Unless of course the truth is exactly what they don’t want
to find. The first line of defense for political crooks
is the process or bureaucracy itself.
Or, maybe she is getting lots of free publicity............about unlawful use of Social Security numbers.........
8:}
Hey man, when you call a Federal judge a “traitor” (as she did in Georgia), you’d better expect the next Federal judge will expect you to dot the i’s and t’s. Seriously.
And cross the t’s . . . that’s what I get for being lazy.
Orly is an absolute idiot and has only made conservatives look ridiculous with this incessant nonsense.
I’m with you brother. The Whole world knows Obama is a fraud.
Isn’t Orly supposed to view the original BC in HI tomorrow with 2 experts? I was thinking the 8th was the date on the subpoena. Thats if the state of HI doesn’t blow her off which I expect them to do. They probably won’t give her anything unless the judge orders it.
You are exactly right. She has made an effort, and is still making an effort to expose Zero for the fraud he is. No, she is not a professional lawyer, IMHO, but has more balls than 98% of the “professional” attorneys. How many of those that have bashed her have tried to expose Zero? She has risked her life for this cause, as there are any number of Zero’s thugs that would harm her.
It’s not always the dog that is in the fight, but sometimes,it’s the fight that is in the dog. She may never succeed in exposing the usurper, but she has definitely tried!
>>> a liberal judge criticizing someone trying to get to expose the democrat cover-up?
I note birthers have a weak grip on facts in a number of areas.
Federal Judge Royce Lamberth is best known for the ease with which he approved dozens of discovery motions that allowed fellow conservative Larry Klayman of Judicial Watch to dig into the public and private life of President Bill Clinton. — Washington Monthly › Vol. 33 Nbr. 10, October 2001
Lamberth graduated from the University of Texas and from the University of Texas School of Law, receiving an LL.B. in 1967. He served as a Captain in the Judge Advocate General’s Corps of the United States Army from 1968 to 1974, including one year in Vietnam.
He was nominated to the federal bench on March 19, 1987 by President Ronald Reagan, and confirmed by the United States Senate on November 13, 1987.
In May 2003, in a case brought by the families of the 241 servicemen who were killed in the 1983 Beirut barracks bombing, Lamberth declared that the Islamic Republic of Iran was responsible for the 1983 attack. On September 7, 2007, Judge Lamberth ordered that Iran pay USD$2.65 billion to the families of the 241 U.S. servicepersons killed in the bombing.
In August 2010, Lamberth issued a temporary injunction blocking an executive order by President Barack Obama that expanded stem cell research. He indicated the policy violated a ban on federal money being used to destroy embryos. Some commentators have surmised that his decision is more a reflection of his politics than a rigorous interpretation of the Dickey-Wicker Amendment.
“a liberal judge criticizing someone trying to get to expose the democrat cover-up?
i’m shocked. dismayed even”
Hahahaha... Royce Lamberth, “a liberal judge”. Oh, you crack me up. In her quo warranto suit, Orly Taitz *requested* Judge Lamberth. http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=7548
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.