Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 08/12/2011 5:19:48 AM PDT by nuconvert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-25 last
To: nuconvert

He’s probably going through menopause.


58 posted on 08/12/2011 7:13:50 AM PDT by rintense (God made me a conservative. FR made me a better one. :))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nuconvert

Chris, are you a flake?


78 posted on 08/12/2011 1:13:30 PM PDT by COBOL2Java (Obama is the least qualified guy in whatever room he walks into.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nuconvert; ml/nj; holdonnow; Sean Hannity; ExTexasRedhead; RobinMasters; melancholy; SunkenCiv; ...
It's not so much the "Gatcha" question to Gingrich that made Chris Wallace's performance grating, but more so the tiff between Michele Bachmann and Tim Pawlenty that Wallace deliberately provoked. Perhaps he sensed that the "Minnesota twins" were not on the best of terms with each other to begin with and exploited the bad vibes between them.

In general, Wallace tries to be objective working for FOX, but it must be his father's CBS genes in him that cause him problems with questioning conservatives.

79 posted on 08/13/2011 8:34:01 AM PDT by justiceseeker93
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nuconvert

I found Chris Wallace’s rebuttal more offensive than the original question. It was his and the panel’s job to ask tough questions and, per his entirely too defensive rebuttal, about their ‘record.’ A campaign personnel issue is not Newt’s or anyone else’s ‘record.’

From my POV, Newt did win the night on the debate, but I don’t see that getting him the nomination. He is unquestionably the smartest of all candidates, announced and not, but he’s done himself in with his personal behavior. He just doesn’t have a presidential temperament, which would include self-restraint (only Clinton gets a pass on that).


81 posted on 08/13/2011 12:01:09 PM PDT by EDINVA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nuconvert
Fox New and the Examiner have done worse. They had themes supposedly promising to ask each candidate a question on a topic. And yet on immigration, they skipped Bachmann and Pawlenty. They skipped other candidates on other issues.
Failure, Fraud or Bias?
82 posted on 08/13/2011 12:17:09 PM PDT by rmlew ("Mosques are our barracks, minarets our bayonets, domes our helmets, the believers our soldiers.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-25 last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson