Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Judge rules on Obama's Social Security Number [Tells attorney: 'Today is not your lucky day']
WND ^ | August 30, 2011 | Bob Unruh

Posted on 08/30/2011 4:32:16 PM PDT by RobinMasters

Announcing it's "not her lucky day," a federal judge in Washington, D.C., has told an eligibility attorney he has dismissed her case demanding information from the Social Security Administration regarding President Barack Obama's Social Security Number, sought because of suspicions it may be fraudulent.

The case was filed by California attorney Orly Taitz, who has battled many of the major court challenges to Obama's tenure in office based on a lack of evidence that he qualifies under the U.S. Constitution's requirement that a president be a "natural-born citizen."

The case at hand was filed against the Social Security Administration because of evidence that Obama's number was designated for use in Connecticut, when Obama has claimed he grew up in Hawaii and apparently had a Social Security Number there, as he reported he worked in an ice-cream shop then.

There has been no evidence he ever lived in Connecticut, and investigators have described the circumstances as suspicious.

The judge, Royce Lamberth credits Taitz for her dedication to her cause, but boasted that "today is not her lucky day."

He concluded that there's no real interest in determining whether the Obama Social Security Number is genuine or fraudulent, and the need for secrecy for the president trumps all else.

"The SSA explained that the Privacy Act of 1974 ... protects the personal information of social security number holders," he wrote. "The SSA determined ... the plaintiff had identified no public interest that would be served by disclosure."

(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...


TOPICS: Conspiracy; History; Weird Stuff
KEYWORDS: birthcertificate; birther; fraud; lamberth; naturalborncitizen; obama; orlytaitz; roycelamberth; socialsecurity; ssn
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-150151-153 next last

1 posted on 08/30/2011 4:32:20 PM PDT by RobinMasters
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: RobinMasters

well, when those charged with responsibility of dispensing blind justice start making cute remarks like that, it’s time to impeach/remove/replace them.


2 posted on 08/30/2011 4:35:44 PM PDT by the invisib1e hand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RobinMasters

Back to filling people’s teeth for Orly


3 posted on 08/30/2011 4:36:31 PM PDT by woofie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RobinMasters

the judge decided there was no real interest in determining whether or not a crime has been committed??

WTF?

seriously... so judges that don’t like a case can now make an unsubstantiated claim and dismiss a case brought before them? this guy needs to be tossed off the bench immediately

obviously the people bringing the case cared... but I guess that no longer matters

lawlessness... pure and simple


4 posted on 08/30/2011 4:37:17 PM PDT by sten (fighting tyranny never goes out of style)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RobinMasters

I think the fix is in.


5 posted on 08/30/2011 4:37:29 PM PDT by Jonty30
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RobinMasters
the plaintiff had identified no public interest that would be served by disclosure."

Wrong!

6 posted on 08/30/2011 4:37:31 PM PDT by Jane Long (2 Chron 7:14)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RobinMasters

I hope someone is keeping track of all these judges with no balls to do their job.


7 posted on 08/30/2011 4:39:19 PM PDT by Safrguns
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sten

who is protecting this guy?


8 posted on 08/30/2011 4:40:03 PM PDT by television is just wrong
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: television is just wrong

Soro’s, Bilderburgers.


9 posted on 08/30/2011 4:42:14 PM PDT by Mmogamer (I refudiate the lamestream media, leftists and their prevaricutions.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Jane Long

She won’t give up, good for her!


10 posted on 08/30/2011 4:44:25 PM PDT by freebird5850 (Of course Obama loves his country...it's just that Sarah Palin loves mine!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: LucyT

Ping!


11 posted on 08/30/2011 4:44:32 PM PDT by Spunky (“Never interupt your enemy when he is making a mistake.” Napolean)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Seizethecarp; rxsid

PING!


12 posted on 08/30/2011 4:46:13 PM PDT by circumbendibus (Obama is an unconstitutional illegal putative president. Quo Warranto in 2011)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: circumbendibus

these judges have no respect for her, she needs to get someone else to back her.


13 posted on 08/30/2011 4:47:32 PM PDT by television is just wrong
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: RobinMasters
is there some reason she doesn't file in a less bias jurisdiction???
14 posted on 08/30/2011 4:48:12 PM PDT by Chode (American Hedonist - *DTOM* -ww- NO Pity for the LAZY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RobinMasters

“He concluded that there’s no real interest in determining whether the Obama Social Security Number is genuine or fraudulent, and the need for secrecy for the president trumps all else.”

It’s been “twittered.”

Badges? We don’t need no stinkin’ badges.


15 posted on 08/30/2011 4:48:40 PM PDT by Smokeyblue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RobinMasters

This ruling is totally insane. Obama has congress and judges wrapped around his fraudent finger. Truly stunning beyond words.


16 posted on 08/30/2011 4:48:51 PM PDT by SouthDixie (The secret to staying young is to live honestly, eat slowly and lie about your age.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RobinMasters

Of course not. The judge is in obama’s pocket just like everyone else.


17 posted on 08/30/2011 4:49:13 PM PDT by jersey117
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RobinMasters
Royce Lamberth used to be a publicity hound during the Clinton years, often making provocative statements but never amounting to anything. Sounds like he hasn't changed.
18 posted on 08/30/2011 4:49:21 PM PDT by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freebird5850

She’s got ‘em. The judges don’t.


19 posted on 08/30/2011 4:50:34 PM PDT by ladyjane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: RobinMasters

0bama’s guilty, or the judge wouldn’t have arrived at that decision.


20 posted on 08/30/2011 4:52:33 PM PDT by FrdmLvr (culture, language, borders)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RobinMasters

“Uncle Omar for President - 2012”

Why have a halfrican Kenyan illegal alien when you can get the real deal?

Uncle Omar - An illegal alien before being an illegal alien was legal.

“Barry/Uncle Omar - 2012”

When one Kenyan illegal alien is not enough.


21 posted on 08/30/2011 4:55:08 PM PDT by Smokeyblue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RobinMasters
Quelle surprise.

The next thing you know the sun will rise in the east.

22 posted on 08/30/2011 5:01:12 PM PDT by El Sordo (The bigger the government, the smaller the citizen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: television is just wrong

Protecting you ask ??

heh heh heh

Well, I guess if you call what “Uncle Vito” is selling “Protection”

You can call it that.....


23 posted on 08/30/2011 5:03:22 PM PDT by onona (Busted !! (got caught looking at Allegra's tagline :()
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: the invisib1e hand

>> “well, when those charged with responsibility of dispensing blind justice start making cute remarks like that, it’s time to impeach/remove/replace them.” <<

.
Well, we certainly do not want to impeach Royce Lamberth, and replace him with an Obama appointee.


24 posted on 08/30/2011 5:06:01 PM PDT by editor-surveyor (Sarah Palin - 2012 !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: television is just wrong
these judges have no respect for her, she needs to get someone else to back her.

They are not require to respect her, but they are required to respect the law, or at least they should be. People make fun of Orley, but do nothing to enjoin the battle. God help her, may Justice prevail, before He returns.

25 posted on 08/30/2011 5:07:47 PM PDT by itsahoot (--I will still vote for Sarah Palin, even if she doesn't run.--My vote is already bought, so move on)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

Comment #26 Removed by Moderator

To: RobinMasters

OK, then I am going to get about 15 more SS #’s and collect 15 checks every month in about 25 years.


27 posted on 08/30/2011 5:14:35 PM PDT by Rome2000 (OBAMA IS A COMMUNIST CRYPTO-MUSLIM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RobinMasters

Well is their public interest in the judges home address for a nice loud peaceful protest?

Notice how our courts are ruling against us? At least the judge did not say there was no standing!


28 posted on 08/30/2011 5:17:11 PM PDT by Wurlitzer (Welcome to the new USSA (United Socialist States of Amerika))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freebird5850

I didn’t even know that Orly was a “she”....


29 posted on 08/30/2011 5:21:38 PM PDT by cherry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: the invisib1e hand

This sucks because the case in Hawaii against Fuddy was from this case. Tossed out of Hawaii too.


30 posted on 08/30/2011 5:22:49 PM PDT by DCmarcher-976453 (SARAH PALIN 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: RobinMasters
He concluded that there's no real interest in determining whether the Obama Social Security Number is genuine or fraudulent, and the need for secrecy for the president trumps all else.

How's that "transparency" treating you there citizens? Are you ready to admit that we have become a full fledged DICTATORSHIP and that you have NO rights?

31 posted on 08/30/2011 5:29:51 PM PDT by Don Corleone ("Oil the gun..eat the cannoli. Take it to the Mattress.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DCmarcher-976453

Well, I think Dr. Taitz WON again because every time Obama runs from court and from coughing stuff up, it just makes him look more suspicious. If Obama had any brains AND didn’t have anything to hide, he would just cough the stuff up and WHOOSH! there goes the rest of the Birthers. BUT, Obama needs the Birthers.


32 posted on 08/30/2011 5:40:45 PM PDT by Squeeky ("Truth is so rare that it is delightful to tell it. " Emily Dickinson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: RobinMasters

Judge Royce Lamberth - Criminal...Scriminal. Who cares? Secrecy for the president trumps all else.

Judge Col. Denise Lind - I agree with this ruling. We don’t want to embarrass the President. Besides the chain of command ends at the Pentagon. Sure I just made that up but at least my ruling isn’t as stupid as the “it’s been twittered judge.”

Judge James Robertson - Two thumbs up for this ruling. It’s been “twittered” already.

Judge David Carter - Ask my recently hired law clerk from Perkins Coie for my opinion. Smart, unbiased kid from the same law firm as Robert Bauer, Obama’s lawyer.


33 posted on 08/30/2011 5:43:52 PM PDT by Smokeyblue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sten
obviously the people bringing the case cared... but I guess that no longer matters

Of course it does not matter that the people bringing the case cared. The Social Security Act contains privacy provisions that generally protect information related to Social Security numbers (and other similarly sensitive personal information). There are exceptions to these protections, and one of the exceptions allows disclosure if there is a substantial public interest (or something to that effect). If it mattered that the people bringing the case cared, then the privacy provisions would mean nothing.

34 posted on 08/30/2011 5:49:48 PM PDT by Conscience of a Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Jonty30

1/2 Black. That’s a mixture that turns the judges of this Country into cowards.

!/4 cup of that stuff sends a rino crying back to mommy


35 posted on 08/30/2011 5:49:48 PM PDT by reefdiver ("Let His day's be few And another takes His office")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Smokeyblue

Might as well throw in Aunt Zeituni as Secretary of State.


36 posted on 08/30/2011 5:50:38 PM PDT by Faith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: RobinMasters

Need for secrecy trumps all else?
I dont recall that being in the Constitution.......


37 posted on 08/30/2011 5:52:57 PM PDT by Red Badger ("Treason doth never prosper.... What's the reason? Why if it prosper, none dare call it treason.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RobinMasters

“...the need for secrecy for the president trumps all else.”

And, all this time we’ve been told the president is just an average joe. So, why all the secrecy over a Social Security Number? Maybe someone will steal it and then his identity, and get a couple of fraudulent loans, or a new TV?

BULL PUCKEY! Just another judicial sham.


38 posted on 08/30/2011 5:58:18 PM PDT by PubliusMM (RKBA; a matter of fact, not opinion. 01-20-2013: Change we can look forward to.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Faith

“Might as well throw in Aunt Zeituni as Secretary of State.”

Brilliant. Three illegals for the price of one.


39 posted on 08/30/2011 6:04:08 PM PDT by Smokeyblue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: RobinMasters

BREAKING NEWS...Uncle Omar has just been admitted to Harvard Law School.

Developing...

“This kid’s got the right stuff. He’s going places.” said a Harvard legal beagle. “He plays his cards right and there might be a Nobel Peace Prize coming his way soon.”


40 posted on 08/30/2011 6:05:29 PM PDT by Smokeyblue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RobinMasters
He concluded that there's no real interest in determining whether the Obama Social Security Number is genuine or fraudulent

Of course not /s

41 posted on 08/30/2011 6:08:07 PM PDT by paul51 (11 September 2001 - Never forget)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: woofie
Back to filling people’s teeth for Orly

Is she any better in the dental office than she is in the courtroom?

42 posted on 08/30/2011 6:09:23 PM PDT by PAR35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: RobinMasters
“.....He concluded that there's no real interest in determining whether the Obama Social Security Number is genuine or fraudulent, and the need for secrecy for the president trumps all else....”

Kind of says it all right there. The courts are about protecting those in power and the secrecy surrounding the President.

43 posted on 08/30/2011 6:12:11 PM PDT by Robert357 (D.Rather "Hoist with his own petard!" www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1223916/posts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PAR35

Through Orly’s persistence, she has pretty well exposed the fact that there simply is no COLB for Obama. The fact that judges keep attempting to stifle her is an indication of how much they fear the public finding out the truth. I applaud Orly for all she has done. Though not perfect, she at least has stepped up to the plate.


44 posted on 08/30/2011 6:18:59 PM PDT by Faith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: itsahoot
They are not require to respect her, but they are required to respect the law

Correct. Of course the law makes SS records private, with certain enumerated exceptions. Since "a crackpot former dentist wants access as a part of a political fishing expedition" is not one of those exceptions, the law required the Judge to toss Orly out on her ear.

As has been predicted here before. More than once.

Face it Birthers. Either Orly is one of the worst lawyers in the history of Anglo-American jurisprudence, or she is deliberately filing cases that she knows she will lose, just to keep you folks riled up.

45 posted on 08/30/2011 6:21:04 PM PDT by Pilsner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: PAR35

What a frightening thought. Can you imagine a billing dispute with her office, and her calling in the UN blue helmets?


46 posted on 08/30/2011 6:21:52 PM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Pilsner
I should not exclude the possibility that Orly is one of the worst lawyers in the history of Anglo-American jurisprudence, and she is deliberately filing cases that she knows she will lose, just to keep Birthers riled up.
47 posted on 08/30/2011 6:23:43 PM PDT by Pilsner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: RobinMasters
He concluded that there's no real interest in determining whether the Obama Social Security Number is genuine or fraudulent, and the need for secrecy for the president trumps all else.

He should be impeached forthwith. Really.

Would the hounorable judge say the same thing if there were compelling evidence that Obama had murdered grandmother?

What happened to all that stuff we heard about Nixon that the President isn't above the law?

I'm serious. Lamberth MUST be impeached and removed.

ML/NJ

48 posted on 08/30/2011 6:25:44 PM PDT by ml/nj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gargantua

We’re tired of your filthy mouth and threats.

Any more of it and you’re a goner.

Got it?


49 posted on 08/30/2011 6:26:12 PM PDT by Admin Moderator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ml/nj

Judge Lamberth was the Judge in many of the Clinton lawsuits. He would seem to rule against Clinton but then give unlimited time to scrub the matter. Then it would be moot. For instance, he ruled the clinton admin had to preserve and turn over numerous emails. They made no effort to comply. Then it ruled it was too late. He is another hick in the Libs pockets.


50 posted on 08/30/2011 6:45:25 PM PDT by DrDude (Focused like a LASER on creating jobs!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-150151-153 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson