is there some reason she doesn't file in a less bias jurisdiction???
Posted on 08/30/2011 4:32:16 PM PDT by RobinMasters
Announcing it's "not her lucky day," a federal judge in Washington, D.C., has told an eligibility attorney he has dismissed her case demanding information from the Social Security Administration regarding President Barack Obama's Social Security Number, sought because of suspicions it may be fraudulent.
The case was filed by California attorney Orly Taitz, who has battled many of the major court challenges to Obama's tenure in office based on a lack of evidence that he qualifies under the U.S. Constitution's requirement that a president be a "natural-born citizen."
The case at hand was filed against the Social Security Administration because of evidence that Obama's number was designated for use in Connecticut, when Obama has claimed he grew up in Hawaii and apparently had a Social Security Number there, as he reported he worked in an ice-cream shop then.
There has been no evidence he ever lived in Connecticut, and investigators have described the circumstances as suspicious.
The judge, Royce Lamberth credits Taitz for her dedication to her cause, but boasted that "today is not her lucky day."
He concluded that there's no real interest in determining whether the Obama Social Security Number is genuine or fraudulent, and the need for secrecy for the president trumps all else.
"The SSA explained that the Privacy Act of 1974 ... protects the personal information of social security number holders," he wrote. "The SSA determined ... the plaintiff had identified no public interest that would be served by disclosure."
(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...
well, when those charged with responsibility of dispensing blind justice start making cute remarks like that, it’s time to impeach/remove/replace them.
Back to filling people’s teeth for Orly
the judge decided there was no real interest in determining whether or not a crime has been committed??
WTF?
seriously... so judges that don’t like a case can now make an unsubstantiated claim and dismiss a case brought before them? this guy needs to be tossed off the bench immediately
obviously the people bringing the case cared... but I guess that no longer matters
lawlessness... pure and simple
I think the fix is in.
Wrong!
I hope someone is keeping track of all these judges with no balls to do their job.
who is protecting this guy?
Soro’s, Bilderburgers.
She won’t give up, good for her!
Ping!
PING!
these judges have no respect for her, she needs to get someone else to back her.
is there some reason she doesn't file in a less bias jurisdiction???
“He concluded that there’s no real interest in determining whether the Obama Social Security Number is genuine or fraudulent, and the need for secrecy for the president trumps all else.”
It’s been “twittered.”
Badges? We don’t need no stinkin’ badges.
This ruling is totally insane. Obama has congress and judges wrapped around his fraudent finger. Truly stunning beyond words.
Of course not. The judge is in obama’s pocket just like everyone else.
She’s got ‘em. The judges don’t.
0bama’s guilty, or the judge wouldn’t have arrived at that decision.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.