Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Does SWAT Need to Be Explained?
Tactical Response ^ | September 2011 | Ed Sanow

Posted on 09/13/2011 12:18:02 PM PDT by Immerito

Does SWAT Need to Be Explained?

Written by Ed Sanow

I get frustrated with the educational sessions at chief’s conferences on SWAT. The attendees are treated like kindergarten kids. “There are some vewy, vewy bad people out there. They won’t do what the nice police officers tell them. So, sometimes, those nice police officers need help from ‘special’ police officers.”

You got to be kidding me! Some 90% of agencies serving populations of more than 50,000 people, and 70% of agencies serving smaller populations have some kind of SWAT team. Yet, SWAT has to be explained like it is something new to policing?

When someone has risen to the rank of chief or sheriff, then SWAT has to be explained to them at a chief’s conference? Have we, as team leaders and team commanders, done that a bad job of explaining what SWAT is and does? As well as when a SWAT team could, or must, be used? Honestly? Yes.

When the local police beat reporter knows more about SWAT than the chief or sheriff, you have a problem. Combine that lack of operational knowledge with the slightest mistake during a SWAT operation and now you have a huge crisis as well as a disbanded tactical team.

SWAT teams, even the better ones, are going to make operations errors. The key, then, is getting everyone up the chain of command familiar with SWAT operations. That especially includes the PIO, who gets to talk to that crime reporter.

Team commanders must raise the profile of their teams. Stay active. Yes, I mean do warrant service and drug raids even if you have to poach the work. First, your team needs the training time under true callout conditions. If all your team does is train, but seldom deploy, you will end up training just to train. You need to train to fight. You already know that.

Second, make SWAT familiar to senior police staff. Everyone fears the unknown. Don’t let SWAT be that unknown. Make deploying SWAT something that is routine, not something only done after much hand-wringing. “Oh, no! You mean we have to call SWAT? Oh, I don’t know, I just don’t know. Really? Call SWAT? Really?”

Yes, you should have clear guidelines for activating the team. But how many times has the callout of a part-time team been delayed or denied when those callout criteria were met? We really do need to explain that SWAT is less of a threat than the people in the calls we are responding to—you know, those vewy, vewy bad people.

Part of the chief’s or sheriff’s fear of the unknown with SWAT is they truly may not know the capabilities—and the limitations—of their particular team. Sometimes we act as if we can do anything and everything. The chief might suspect differently.

In the immortal words of Inspector Harry Callahan, “A man’s got to know his limitations.” So must your SWAT team. Man-up now and draw the line. We can do barricaded gunman, but we can’t do hostage rescue. We can do bus assault, but we can’t rappel. We can do chemical agents, but we can’t do explosive entry. Whatever it may be, know what you can and can’t do.

Do only what you are excellent at doing. Don’t do what you have done once or twice in practice, fully-rested, fully-hydrated, in the middle of a nice sunny day with your full team on-hand. Know the difference. Know what you can do and then find a way to prove it to the administration.

So, do you request a meeting with senior staff and have a “show and tell” with all your cool gear? Perhaps have a few of them stop by the range on training day? The very best way to prove the capabilities of your team is to conduct an all-discipline, mock exercise. It needs to be realistic and relevant: active shooter, barricaded gunman—something that makes sense. Remember the goal is to convince the chief of your team’s capabilities. Inspire the chief’s confidence in the team. Educate the chief.

You don’t need to include Fire/EMS for the first few of these, but they eventually need to be included. However, you do need to include the entire chain of police command: dispatch, patrol, SWAT, negotiators, supervisors, the chief. Perhaps just a table-top exercise for the upper management, but they need to be somehow involved because that is the point. Also, the chief needs to be there during the after-action debrief.

You need to educate your chief. Don’t let the local press do it. Don’t force the chief to attend a class at a conference on it. You do it.


TOPICS: Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: banglist; commies; donutwatch; federal; funding; govtabuse; jbt; jbts; lping; policestate; socialism; swat; swatabuse; tyranny; waronliberty; waronus
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-38 next last
Unbelievable. This is blatant disregard for the rights of American citizens.
1 posted on 09/13/2011 12:18:03 PM PDT by Immerito
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Immerito
"Listen, kids. Your government is evil. Your government has soldiers who wear black uniforms and masks. They have guns. Big guns and lots of 'em. The government will come to your house at night, kick in the door and shoot your dog. If your Dad acts surprised, they will shoot him too.
Yes, Tommy?"

"Teacher, why are you telling us this?"

"Well, Tommy, we want you to know that questioning authority is never a good idea. And by the way, tell your Dad not to act surprised tonight, okay?"

2 posted on 09/13/2011 12:24:15 PM PDT by ClearCase_guy (The USSR spent itself into bankruptcy and collapsed -- and aren't we on the same path now?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Immerito
1)Go to wrong house at 3am.

2)Handcuff homeowner/wife and kids.

3)Hunt down and shoot family dog.

4)Ransack house.

5)Find out at wrong house.

6)Uncuff family members, warn them not to say anything under penalty of law.

7)Leave

3 posted on 09/13/2011 12:24:15 PM PDT by SkyDancer (I'm With The FAA And I'm Here To Help You.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Immerito

There are a lot more of us, then there are of them. Plenty of us have specialized military training as well. They are starting to get out of line.


4 posted on 09/13/2011 12:24:57 PM PDT by Soothesayer9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Immerito; All

Considering when Chief Daryl Gates of the LAPD came up with the concept of SWAT. Its original definition was Special Weapons Attack Team.

I’ll let you take it from there.

Jack.


5 posted on 09/13/2011 12:28:56 PM PDT by Jack Deth (Knight Errant and Resident FReeper Kitty Poem /Haiku Guy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Immerito

This could have been written in any Fascist or Communist country to rave reviews. Goebbels would have been proud. Who the hell reads this crap? The Tactical Responder? Give me a break.


6 posted on 09/13/2011 12:29:47 PM PDT by Graneros (The most fundamental purpose of government is defense, not empire. – Joseph Sobran)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Immerito
Make deploying SWAT something that is routine, not something only done after much hand-wringing.

And they can do animal control, too!


7 posted on 09/13/2011 12:35:04 PM PDT by archy (I'd give my right arm to be ambidextrous!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Immerito
Does SWAT Need to Be Explained?

No, but the widespread use of SWAT teams needs to be seriously re-examined.

8 posted on 09/13/2011 12:35:35 PM PDT by WayneS (Enlightened statesmen will not always be at the helm. -- James Madison)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Immerito
Stay active. Yes, I mean do warrant service and drug raids even if you have to poach the work.

Disgusting.

9 posted on 09/13/2011 12:37:00 PM PDT by WayneS (Enlightened statesmen will not always be at the helm. -- James Madison)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Immerito
SWAT, explained:

It's been this way for 25 years. You're just now catching on.

10 posted on 09/13/2011 12:38:15 PM PDT by the invisib1e hand (...then they came for the guitars, and we kicked their sorry faggot asses into the dust)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Immerito
Make deploying SWAT something that is routine...

Disgusting-er...

11 posted on 09/13/2011 12:38:26 PM PDT by WayneS (Enlightened statesmen will not always be at the helm. -- James Madison)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Immerito
Does SWAT Need to Be Explained?

Not really.


12 posted on 09/13/2011 12:38:32 PM PDT by archy (I'd give my right arm to be ambidextrous!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jack Deth

It’s original designation was Special Weapons and Tactics.


13 posted on 09/13/2011 12:41:59 PM PDT by WayneS (Enlightened statesmen will not always be at the helm. -- James Madison)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy

Ouch / LOL — That’s a witty way to describe it.


14 posted on 09/13/2011 1:10:36 PM PDT by OneWingedShark (Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: archy

Comparing SWAT to Nazis is WAAAY out of line.

Nazis were honest and up front about being Nazis.


15 posted on 09/13/2011 1:48:26 PM PDT by tarotsailor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Immerito

—as I have oft posted— SWAT teams should generally be disbanded, issued a .38 Special with two speedloaders, get equipped with a set of brogans with soles about an inch thick and given a beat to cover twice a night -on foot- starting about 10pm-—


16 posted on 09/13/2011 2:52:32 PM PDT by rellimpank (--don't believe anything the media or government says about firearms or explosives--)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Immerito

There are a few times a SWAT team is needed. A couple years ago some nut job here in Pittsburgh shot and killed three policemen who responded to a family fight. Killed the three ambush style.
Pittsburgh SWAT was call out and I think they did a damn good job. In the face of constant gunfire they drove their armored car on to the lawn to get the men shot{ They didnt know that they were dead}. they didnt shoot up the house{As I would have seeing three of my co-workers killed by a coward}. They talked to him, when One of the snipers shot the AK out of his hands.
The scumbag was captured alive{ A little scuffed up} and convicted on three counts of murder and hopefully will be seeing the needle,and the judge added 80 years onto his term so he will never get to see sunshine again.
All this cop hate is really disturbing. Yeah there are bad police. Sure they screw up. Some of the people here sound like they would have rooted for the man who killed the policemen who showed up that morning.


17 posted on 09/13/2011 2:58:30 PM PDT by Yorlik803 (better to die on your feet than live on your knees.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Immerito
First, your team needs the training time under true callout conditions.

Many so-called "SWAT" teams do the vast majority of their deployments against harmless victims. Good for them, since their tactics are so sloppy that they'd be mincemeat if they tried to attack someone with the skill and determination to fight back effectively. Not so good for their victims, though.

18 posted on 09/13/2011 3:54:28 PM PDT by supercat (Barry Soetoro == Bravo Sierra)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Graneros

It is more than a bit disturbing that SWAT teams seem to have their own magazine.


19 posted on 09/13/2011 4:45:05 PM PDT by Immerito (Reading Through the Bible in 90 Days)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: archy

I don’t know; the way that arthritic lab is holding that tennis ball in its jaws, it is clearly a vicious killer.

:-)

( /sarc )


20 posted on 09/13/2011 4:46:56 PM PDT by Immerito (Reading Through the Bible in 90 Days)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-38 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson