Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Laws to Catch Up With Science
Jewish World Review ^ | 9/19/2011 | Diane Dimond

Posted on 09/19/2011 7:13:33 AM PDT by Former Fetus

Many years ago, I was assigned to cover a story about a certain sperm donor, a newly graduated doctor in Kansas who had donated on such a frequent and regular basis that he was suspected of being the biological father to 500 children. You read that right, 500 children!

My research led me to learn that professors and medical mentors had often urged their male med school residents to donate sperm as a way to: a) Put a little money in their pockets and b) Help propagate future generations of intelligent children. The belief was that if the sperm came from a person smart enough and driven enough to study to be a doctor, well, all of mankind could benefit from the children they would sire.

An elitist viewpoint, to be sure, but a prevalent one back in the early '90s.

A problem arose following this particular Kansas doctor's years of donating when it was learned that many of the recipients lived within a small radius. The children who resulted from this man's donations began to grow up within miles of each other, and as they matured into teenagers, attending the same schools, churches or sport camps, they began to become attracted to each other, pulled together by an unexplainable and invisible magnet of familiarity. Some of the teens began dating and were sexually attracted to each other. Accidental incest was a real possibility — if it hadn't already happened, I was told.

(Excerpt) Read more at jewishworldreview.com ...


TOPICS: Health/Medicine; Miscellaneous; Science; Society
KEYWORDS: ethics; incest; ivf
One does not have to be a Catholic (I am not one) to see the ethical tar baby that sperm donation can become. It seems that, to a great many people, if we can do it we will do it! What happened with being happy with the children the Lord gave you?


1 posted on 09/19/2011 7:13:36 AM PDT by Former Fetus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Former Fetus

A long time ago there was a Gahan Wilson cartoon which showed a deformed, crippled, chuckling old man walking down the street. Behind him was a building with the sign, “Sperm Bank.”


2 posted on 09/19/2011 7:22:22 AM PDT by Pearls Before Swine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Former Fetus

Morals and ethics aside, does anyone know how serious the results of a single half inbreeding are likely to be? I’ve seen cows do that without any apparent problem.

So wh at I’m wondering is whether this is really a practical issue at all, or mainly theoretical.


3 posted on 09/19/2011 7:25:32 AM PDT by Pessimist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Former Fetus
What happened with being happy with the children the Lord gave you?

The children grew into teenagers with electric guitars, hair-straighteners, and attitude problems.

But seriously, folks, I believe it's not going to be long before sperm donation becomes a ticket to 500 child-support bills - several court rulings here and internationally have held donors financially responsible - and the issue will largely vanish.

4 posted on 09/19/2011 7:33:43 AM PDT by Tax-chick (I welcome our new reptilian overlords. They are so quiet!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Former Fetus

>> I recently did some research on that Kansas doctor whose story I reported so many years ago. He is still in the same area, with an apparently successful psychiatry practice <<

The fact that this guy is a psychiatrist makes the situation potentially even worse. Sure, there are lots of sane psychiatrists in the world. But it’s no secret that many members of the profession got into that line of work precisely because they were seeking answers to their OWN mental problems — problems that frequently (usually?) have a strong genetic component.

Therefore, if and when the psychiatrist’s sons and daughters start procreating with one another, the odds would seem to be much, much higher than average that their offspring will inherit double dosages of certain recessive genes for mental illness.


5 posted on 09/19/2011 7:37:15 AM PDT by Hawthorn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pessimist

>> I’m wondering is whether this is really a practical issue at all, or mainly theoretical <<

Not theoretical at all. If my math is correct, the odds of a “defective” child are the same as when a girl is impregnated by one of her uncles.

Or put another way, Why do you think Arkansas and West Virginia have produced so many morally defective politicians?


6 posted on 09/19/2011 7:48:04 AM PDT by Hawthorn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Pessimist
" I’ve seen cows do that without any apparent problem. So what I’m wondering is whether this is really a practical issue at all, or mainly theoretical.

It depends on if we are gonna make steak out of them

7 posted on 09/19/2011 7:48:13 AM PDT by Mr. K (Palin/Bachman 2012- unbeatable ticket~!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Pessimist

8 posted on 09/19/2011 7:58:13 AM PDT by Errant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Hawthorn

“Not theoretical at all. If my math is correct, the odds of a “defective” child are the same as when a girl is impregnated by one of her uncles.”

So what are those odds. Seriously.

You point out WV as an example. But that’s not the same case. There it has been going on for ~ many generations~ with closed populations.

My point was that, as with the cows I’m familiar with, it probably doesn’t matter at all unless it were to go on for several generations without any influx of new genetic material.


9 posted on 09/19/2011 11:35:21 AM PDT by Pessimist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Pessimist

>> So what are those odds <<

I figure the offspring of two half-siblings will get “double dosages” for about 12.5% of their genes — whereas the corresponding percentage for first-cousin marriages is 6.25%, while for second-cousin marriages it’s only 1.56%.

(But I’m not a geneticist. So if anybody out there can correct me, I hope you will!)

Now nobody knows how many “defective” recessive genes a particular family may be carrying. But I feel confident in asserting that every family will have SOME of them. So every family is probably at risk for some defect or another.

Therefore:

If you marry your half-sister, your kids will probably have a risk of genetic defects that’s at least twelve times as great as the risk would be if you married an “unrelated” person.

This level of risk may be OK for cattle, where maybe one in eight would need to be culled — or simply would die very early — due to a serious defect. But human societies seem to have decided long ago that it’s not an acceptable level of risk for people, as witness the widespread bans on half-sibling marriages across many religions and cultures.


10 posted on 09/19/2011 2:56:27 PM PDT by Hawthorn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson