"The ex cathedra claim that a designer is required is also a priori, and by that standard has nothing to do with logic."
Unfortunately, you have violated your own standard. You have assumed a designer for that post 'ex cathedra' and 'a priori' and therefore without logic. On what basis did you do that and why would it not also apply to your claim above?
posted on 10/16/2011 9:09:11 AM PDT
(Eccl 10:2 - The heart of the wise inclines to the right, but the heart of the fool to the left.)
What you’re saying there makes absolutely no sense.
posted on 10/16/2011 5:15:15 PM PDT
(It's never a bad time to FReep this link -- https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson