Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: truthkeeper
[Thanks for the ping. Please keep me on the list.]

***

"Joe Tacopina says he would not have taken the case if he had even the slightest hesitation that the parents were involved."

***

At this point no one knows for sure what the involvement of the parents is, but I don't believe anything Tacopina says.

14 posted on 10/19/2011 7:25:38 AM PDT by Dr. Scarpetta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: Dr. Scarpetta
Tacopina defended Joran Van dershoot, who killed Natalie Holloway. The idea that Tacopina wouldn't represent a person he though could be guilty is risible.
19 posted on 10/19/2011 8:07:25 AM PDT by utahagen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: Dr. Scarpetta

Me neither. Didn’t he represent OJ at one time? Or maybe just advocated for him on the legal talking head shows...


22 posted on 10/19/2011 8:21:16 AM PDT by MizSterious (Apparently, there's no honor when it comes to someone else's retirement funds.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson