Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

A cancer CURE fought tooth and nail by the FDA
Burzynski research institute ^

Posted on 11/06/2011 7:04:58 AM PST by Hayeksright

First time posting. Wanted to inform and start a discussion on the FDA and National Cancer Institute's motivations for FIGHTING a proven cancer cure...


TOPICS: Health/Medicine; Science
KEYWORDS: burzynski; cancer; con; fake; fda; nci; propaganda; suckerborneverymin
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-46 next last
To: Paladin2

It’s a miracle!.... IT’S A MIRACLE!!!.... I’m cured!... I’M CURED!!!!


21 posted on 11/06/2011 8:13:14 AM PST by donhunt (Certified and proud "Son of a Bitch".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Hayeksright

Thanks for posting.

Approximately 35 years ago there was an article in Penthouse (yes, Penthouse) entitled, ‘The Solid Gold Cancer Train’, and it was a very well researched and clearly written article. I knew back then that the cancer industry was big business, a medical mafia, and here we are 35 years later and it’s bigger than ever.

In 1973 my college roommate paid $250 for a calculator that was 1/10th as powerful as the calculator in my granddaughter’s $7.00 toy play-phone. I could go on about the exponential leaps in technology but I’m sure you get the idea. How far, really, have we come with cancer cures?


22 posted on 11/06/2011 8:16:57 AM PST by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: donhunt

I’m not cured, but I do definitely feel better. I’m not kidding either.


23 posted on 11/06/2011 8:18:48 AM PST by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: donhunt
I'm partial to Viking Long Boats, loaded with plunder:


24 posted on 11/06/2011 8:21:36 AM PST by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Hayeksright
I've seen the documentary. If the allegations put forth in that film are true, the government is guilty of patent fraud, grand larceny, and probably conspiracy to commit murder through medical negligence.

However, the documentary was clearly slanted in Dr. Burzynski's favor, and so I only got half the story. It would seem to me that not even this arrogant government could offend any private citizen so egregiously and escape without consequence.

25 posted on 11/06/2011 8:24:08 AM PST by IronJack (=)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GGpaX4DumpedTea

I truly hope that this turns out to be as wonderful as it sounds. I don’t understand why he doesn’t seek some VC money to help move Phase 3 trials forward. He would still have control of the patent.
With regard to your thoughts on Oncologists, you are completely off-base. I used to sell onc meds and I do not know one physician who would not love to see a cure for every known cancer. These people have dedicated their lives to helping people and, in many cases, curing their cancers. Wake up


26 posted on 11/06/2011 8:27:41 AM PST by NHCaveman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: NHCaveman

Why would he seek money from the VietCong?

(I know...venture capital)


27 posted on 11/06/2011 9:00:12 AM PST by EEGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Paladin2

I liked the paper. Thanks for the link.


28 posted on 11/06/2011 9:01:21 AM PST by EEGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Hayeksright

Is this the Steve Jobs cure? He thought the Docs were wrong too.


29 posted on 11/06/2011 9:05:16 AM PST by Wingy (Don't blame me. I voted for the chick. I hope to do so again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EEGator

NOT GUILTY...

Wait....What was the question???


30 posted on 11/06/2011 9:09:27 AM PST by phockthis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Hayeksright

Has been posted here several times already in the past few months...

=8-)


31 posted on 11/06/2011 9:10:47 AM PST by =8 mrrabbit 8=
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hayeksright

It’s another chapter of “Death By Liberalism”. I guess a lot of people have died while the FDA goes through its red tape.


32 posted on 11/06/2011 9:12:27 AM PST by RoadTest (For there is one God, and one mediator between God and men, the man Christ Jesus.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: miele man

bump


33 posted on 11/06/2011 9:26:37 AM PST by miele man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: phockthis

Exactly...


34 posted on 11/06/2011 9:52:01 AM PST by EEGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Lancey Howard

If I remember that article, it was part of a series which included “alternative” cancer treatments, written by Gary Null. There, I read about an immune-augmentation therapy being offered in the Bahamas by a U.S researcher who’d been ostracized/defunded stateside by the American Cancer Society and related medical establishment. At that time my father had been through all the conventional treatments for his nasopharyngeal cancer and we were advised he had less than a month to live. We took him to the Bahamas in a semi-comatose state and he shortly recovered to the point of living another 1.5 years alert and in reasonably good condition. The treatment was not nearly as costly as the conventional treatments. We were told by the U.S. docs that immune therapy was a “waste” and “junk science”, which is ironic since it’s a hot commodity now that pharmaceutical companies have begun developing various immune system-related therapies.


35 posted on 11/06/2011 10:33:18 AM PST by Magic Fingers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: NHCaveman

“With regard to your thoughts on Oncologists...”

Though I may share that view, it is one expressed by Dr Julian Whitaker, MD, in my post. Note that this is only one of many ‘alternative cures’ for cancer that have been suppressed by the FDA/AMA/Drug Cartel. Note also that the testing for the drug industry drugs is not as thorough as they want to impose on treatments that do not come from the Drug Cartel.

Those good doctors who have ‘dedicated their lives to helping people’ are punished/banished by their controllers, the AMA/FDA if they even tell a patient about ‘alternative’ treatments. And cure? The allopathic medical profession does not have the ‘Cure’ word in their vocabulary. These good doctors are part of the same profession that used mercury (quacksilver) to treat disease. They are part of the same profession that still administer vaccines that have mercury in them...vaccines that have gone through virtually no rigourous testing protocols.

And by the way, I am awake. Perhaps it is time for you to take off the blinders.


36 posted on 11/06/2011 11:07:23 AM PST by GGpaX4DumpedTea (I am a tea party descendant - steeped in the Constitutional legacy handed down by the Founders)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: AlmaKing

I am familiar with his product and why he was prosecuted, my mother was dying of cancer about that time.


37 posted on 11/06/2011 11:43:09 AM PST by dangerdoc (see post #6)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: GGpaX4DumpedTea
Mercurochrome worked fine when I was a kid.

Silver-Hg amalgam tooth fillings haven't made me crazy - yet.

38 posted on 11/06/2011 11:46:36 AM PST by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: AlmaKing
If cancer treatments don’t come from government funded or drug company funded research, then they get labeled ‘alternative’ intentionally to demonize them. It’s surprising that Freepers respond in defense of the system set up to prohibit this doctor’s research when they claim they are freedom loving and small government folks.

This ignores the way markets actually work.

You are quite correct that a cheap, easy and simple cancer cure would upset a lot of gravy trains.

However, any one of the big powerful drug companies that acquired or licensed the rights to the process would make a great deal of money, while damaging its competitors.

So the "coverup" theory is based on the notion that each and every one of the drug companies will do what's good for the industry as a whole rather than what is good for that particular company.

Things don't work that way. Any company will cheerfully, even gleefully, destroy its entire industry if it is its own best interest.

39 posted on 11/06/2011 7:02:22 PM PST by Sherman Logan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: AlmaKing
If cancer treatments don’t come from government funded or drug company funded research, then they get labeled ‘alternative’ intentionally to demonize them. It’s surprising that Freepers respond in defense of the system set up to prohibit this doctor’s research when they claim they are freedom loving and small government folks.

This ignores the way markets actually work.

You are quite correct that a cheap, easy and simple cancer cure would upset a lot of gravy trains.

However, any one of the big powerful drug companies that acquired or licensed the rights to the process would make a great deal of money, while damaging its competitors.

So the "coverup" theory is based on the notion that each and every one of the drug companies will do what's good for the industry as a whole rather than what is good for that particular company.

Things don't work that way. Any company will cheerfully, even gleefully, destroy its entire industry if it is its own best interest.

40 posted on 11/06/2011 7:02:53 PM PST by Sherman Logan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-46 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson