Skip to comments.President Obama acused of sexual harassment. Media slams accuser with charges of racism.
Posted on 11/08/2011 4:40:57 AM PST by Do Be
Media works overtime to destroy accuser's reputation.
Ain't it the truth?
Yet no problems going after Herman Cain with the same charges of sexual harassment.
or just a rogue statement
Who is the guy or guys?
nice “breaking news” vanity there...
(On your point...you’re absolutely right)
Right on with that question.
For a sexual harrassment charge in the press to have any traction, it must be made against a person one sees as a possible violator. In this case, the effete person in charge here has no possibility of any woman making such a charge or even if so for it to stick. Now if a guy made it, well now, that could be an issue.
Vapid vanity post.
Since his youthful fling with homosexuality and drug use at the feet of his old communist indoctrinator, Barry thought it best to avoid sex altogether as it would interfere with his puppetmaster’s plans for him.
Therefore, like Bill Clinton, he allowed his masters to select a spouse for him to make him look normal. And so, like Clinton, they picked a leftist wookie.
Although it was distasteful for Barry he impregnated his wookie twice which made him look twice as manly as Clinton who had to hook up with bimbos in order to get his jollies.
Barry is an automaton, or a zombie, who lurches forth in his desire to destroy his nation. There is no way he would ‘hit’ on a member of the opposite sex as he is, indeed, asexual.
I see you’ve been here at FR since the day after Obama was elected (or the day before). If you had been here earlier you would know there have been a couple of guys allegedly involved with Obama — except some of them are now dead... Larry Sinclair is the one who came forward and was absolutely ignored by all the media.
“For a sexual harrassment charge in the press to have any traction, it must be made against a person one sees as a possible violator. In this case, the effete person in charge here has no possibility of any woman making such a charge or even if so for it to stick. Now if a guy made it, well now, that could be an issue.”
From the Boyz at HillBuzz in Chicago:
Nov. 8, 2011
Is Barack Obama Gay? (Pictures)
Kevin DuJan and Megan Fox talk about the double standard for sex scandals in politics on blog-talk radio
Why wont the agenda-driven media report on Barack Obama being gay, sexually harassing male actor Kal Penn, and frequenting Chicago bathhouse Mans Country
you know, the way they leaped to trash Herman Cain with unsubstantiated sexual innuendo?
Posted on November 7, 2011 by Kevin DuJan
Last week, the agenda-driven, drive-by media trashed Republican presidential candidate Herman Cain with unsubstantiated and poorly sourced sexual innuendo.
This week, lets all talk about Democrat President Barack Obama being gay, him sexually harassing male actor Kal Penn, and his frequenting of Chicago gay bathhouse Mans Country using the Lefts established precedent for journalistic integrity when it comes to rumor and gossip.
Fairs fair, right in love, politics, and whats apparently allowable in the 2012 election now that all-out war was declared on the black Republican presidential contender. Why shouldnt conservatives treat Barack Obama the way the Left treated Herman Cain? If the operating assumption is that anything whispered about by anonymous sources is true about Herman Cain, then I guess everything people in Chicago have talked about for years related to Barack Obama being a closeted gay man into younger Pakistani guys must be true too, right?
During the 2008 election, I campaigned for Hillary Clinton in the Democrat primaries. Repeatedly, I heard over and over here in Chicago that Barack Obama is gay and that his marriage to Michelle is one of mutual convenience. In the black community, this is called being on the down-low, where a closeted gay male weds an often-times gruff and demanding woman (typically without other male suitors of her own) to take public scrutiny off them both and afford the pair a successful life theyd never achieve separately.
There are, apparently, a lot of such relationships forged at Trinity United Church of Christ in Chicago where Barack Obamas pastor, the Reverend Jeremiah Wright, oversaw the coupling of down-low gay black men with sour and caustic black women.
This apparently happens not just in Chicago at Trinity United, but in black communities all over the country. Author Terry McMillen and talking-head Star Jones married down-low gay men to benefit their careers and help their public image too.
Black women who marry gay black men are lavished with all the social perks these marriages of convenience afford them, while the men get to go off together on camping trips, to basketball games out of town, or to other social events where they can engage in gay activity with one another secure in the knowledge that no one in the Reverend Wrights down-low club would rat the other fellas out. You need to understand how much homosexuality is despised in the black community to appreciate both the need for gay black men to stay down-low and the willingness of some black women to become beards for these men when they think they can benefit from the arrangement in some way themselves (usually because these are difficult-to-deal-with women who were unable to find anyone willing to marry them otherwise).
Oprah Winfrey and her longtime boyfriend Stedman Graham were for many years also members of Trinity United Church of Christ, and you can read whatever you may like into that.
In Chicagos Boystown gay community, older guys who frequented the little dive bars that have been around forever told tales back in the 2008 primaries about Barack Obama slipping out whenever he was in Chicago for romps at the local bathhouse Mans Country. The details given in these accounts of his activities were substantial. Apparently, he went most often to this Andersonville neighborhood bathhouse on Wednesdays, and while there he was rumored to seek oral sex from older white men. According to the gossip, Barack Obama would never reciprocate in these encounters, but enjoyed being pleasured by older white guys. Evidently, he is not a giver and is something of a selfish bathhouse regular when not being the current President of the United States.
This jives with everything Larry Sinclair said about his own sexual encounter with Barack Obama in the back of a limo many years ago. You remember Larry Sinclair, right? Hes the man the agenda-driven media worked overtime to destroy and did its level best to silence because he posed a direct threat to the narrative the Left needed to push for Barack Obama to elect him president and needless to say, that narrative didnt include Barack Obama receiving oral sex from another man in the back of a limo in Chicago.
You need to appreciate that when a Democrat is accused of anything, the Democrats accusers are crucified with remarkable zeal in the press; but when someone whispers anything obscene about a Republican, that person is lauded by the journalists of the Left as the bravest and most credible person who ever lived even if that person refuses to give her name, actually state on record what she claimed happened, or provide any sort of corroborating evidence that what shes alleging is in any way remotely true.
To the media, its true just because it was said about a Republican. Meanwhile, Democrats can always get away with murder. Just ask the Kennedy family about that.
Clearly, we saw this Leftist double-standard (or, non-standard, as the case may be) applied to the mystery woman Politico sourced as Herman Cains sexual harassment accuser last week.
So, why cant we all talk about Barack Obama dating Hollywood actor Kal Penn during the 2008 presidential campaign, and Obama then inventing a strange, nebulous position for the actor in the early days of the Obama administration (just so Penn could abruptly leave his hit TV show and move to Washington to be close to Obama?). Apparently, since Penn then left the White House abruptly after just a few months of work (in a position that was created solely for him) the current President and his down-low boyfriend must have broken up.
Did Barack Obama sexually harass his subordinate, Kal Penn, in the brief time he worked in the Obama White House?
You can speculate about what went wrong between these lovebirds while youre watching the new Harold & Kumar movie or eating at White Castle. Because, lets face it, if there was an (R) after Barack Obamas name this whole affair with Penn would have been nonstop news since 2009 instead of the pervasive sound of chirping crickets we got because Barack Obamas a (D) which stands for down-low, dont you know.
Why shouldnt this week be all about talking about Barack Obama being gay and having sexual misadventures with men, since if it was a Republican president theres no doubt the agenda-driven media would have been all over this story, regardless of who, if anyone, would go on record to confirm any of it.
You know full well the journalists on sites like Politico would have spent the last three years digging relentlessly into a Republican presidents past, repeatedly asking why not a single former girlfriend has ever stepped forward to identify herself or speak on the record about her past with the man currently in the Oval Office.
Isnt it strange that the publics never been introduced to A SINGLE GIRLFRIEND that Barack Obama ever had in high school, college, law school, or the days before he met his beard wife Michelle?
Dont you wonder why the journalists of the Left have never done any in-depth profiles of Barack Obamas male friends from his years at Occidental College in California, talked about his roommate while at Columbia, or wondered about any of his social activities through the years?
I know there are endless mysteries centered around a man whose college transcripts, vital records, and other important paperwork were apparently sealed away from the public in an impregnable vault somewhere cloaked in riddles and enigma never to be seen by human eyes again but if Barack Obama was a Republican he would have been outed as gay many years ago.
If Barack Obama was a Republican, the agenda-driven media would have hounded him about the nature of his relationship with his bodyman Reggie Love.
If Barack Obama was a Republican, the Left would have somehow gotten ahold of his lifetime membership at Chicago gay bathhouse Mans Country and would have plastered those records across Politico to destroy his political career.
If Barack Obama was a Republican, the press would have quickly interpreted the dearth of girlfriends in his past as evidence of a surfeit of boyfriends and no one at the New York Times would have slept a wink until every Tom, Dick, or Larry in Barack Obamas little black book was awarded his own reality show to gush about their down-low adventures.
But, Barack Obama is not a Republican, so the agenda-driven media provides him enormous and constant spin to conceal his gay past. Its really very reminiscent of the old days in the studio system, where PR agents worked aggressively to hide the fact that men like Rock Hudson, Montgomery Clift, Tab Hunter, and even Liberace himself were gay because the media had a vested interest in these mens success and it wasnt on the agenda to expose the truth about them. Instead, the media was complicit in selling the public a mutually beneficial fantasy.
Barack Obama is gayer than Liberace, but youll never read about that on Politico just as youll never read about him chain-smoking in the White House, his rampant drug abuse during his twenties and thirties, or the fact he got all Ds and Fs in college (produce his transcripts and prove me wrong on that one).
Because Barack Obama is a Democrat, the agenda-driven media is as committed to promoting a heterosexual, scandal-free image for him, because this is what journalists are apparently trained to do for Democrats in school and its expected for them to do if they wish to keep being employed as journalists in the Democrat public relations machine we call the media in this country.
Someday, when the Left no longer needs Barack Obama to push the Lefts agenda, this protection will be gone and youll spend the last few decades of your life hearing all about Larry Sinclair, Kal Penn, Reggie Love, Mans Country, Jeremiah Wrights Down-Low Club, and the many men Barack Obama has been with through the years. Im sure a great many books will be written on all of this and a great deal of money will be made by the media companies selling the scandal of it all to the public.
But, for now Barack Obama is the Lefts guy, so hes getting the full-on Rock Hudson/Liberace protection treatment.
While, of course, opponents of the Left such as Herman Cain are relentlessly attacked with unsubstantiated sexual innuendo in the agenda-driven medias nonstop effort to discredit and destroy anyone who poses a real threat to Obamas grasp on power.
If you dont see whats really happening here and are someone whos quick to believe the anonymous and sketchy sources the likes of Politico put forward when it comes to a Republican in the hot seat then maybe you should spend today coming up with a valid reason for why YOU cant name a single girlfriend Barack Obama had in his entire life before Michelle and why so much of Barack Obamas past is so aggressively cloaked in perpetual and deliberate mystery.
PS If you ever wonder why Republicans dont just out Barack Obama themselves, you need to really think about how the Cocktail Party GOP establishment actually works.
There are currently at least two closeted gay sitting Republican United States Senators. There are several closeted gay sitting Republican Congressmen.
All of these men are forever praised in the media for being bipartisan, which means they conveniently sell out conservative voters whenever the Left needs them to.
I am 100% convinced theres blackmail afoot in this, with the quid pro quo being these men get to remain sitting Senators and Congressmen so long as they keep folding whenever Democrats need bipartisan votes across the aisle.
Its no coincidence the closeted gay Republicans are all Cocktail Party GOP establishment types who are more interested in maintaining their own hold on power than ever bucking the system and doing whats best for this country and their own constituents.
Its an open secret in the political world that Barack Obama is gay, and that there are plenty of closeted gay Republicans too. But you wont hear about any of this because members of the permanent political class on both sides of the aisle dont want you to hear about it.
AND they all think you are too stupid to ever figure this stuff out on your own.
Even though all the clues are really obvious and sitting RIGHT THERE if you really wanted to piece it together without the medias help.
Read more http://hillbuzz.org/2011/11/07/why-wont-the-agenda-driven-media-report-on-barack-obama-being-gay-dating-actor-kal-penn-and-frequenting-chicago-bathhouse-mans-country-you-know-the-way-they-leaped-to-trash-herman-cain-with-u/
Why do you assume his accuser to be a member of the opposite sex?
Except, of course, that compared to Zero, everyone is a member of the opposite sex.
You sound very high brow. Are you a member of the opposite sex?
Wasn’t he on C-Span, and then was arrested immediately afterward? Larry Sinclair is not credible.
It is nice to see that others are aware of the obvious.
The last time I checked my enormous memory bank the word means insipid.
I’m not high brow at all. I just enjoy the benefits of a good education completed over 50 years ago when it was easier to do so.
The best post I’ve read in a long time!
They ought to know. That’s a Gay conservative (in Chicago) web site.
Since that was written by Kevin DuJan, a conservative Gay who lives in Chicago and knows most of the gays up there and all about that bath house they hang out at, that gives him and his friends on that web site a lot of credibility.
The media loves Obama and will do anything to cover for him,they like his work.
I find your education to be lacking in at least one area. But that's just my opinion and everybody's got one of those. I can see you are proud of yours.
My point was, since you missed it, that the word "vapid" was unnecessary to your post, except to show off your superiority.
I believe the word I'm looking for is supercilious. Adjective 1. Having or showing arrogant superiority to and disdain of those one views as unworthy;...
I included the definition, just in case, you know, your vast memory banks and superior education have a glitch.
So yes, you are right, you are not high brow, you are supercilious in the use of the word vapid. Adjective 1. Having or showing arrogant superiority to and disdain of those one views as unworthy;...
Definition included again, just in case.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.