Cheers!
Posted on 11/13/2011 4:35:35 PM PST by Winstons Julia
In next few hours I will be calling for prominent, powerful congressperson to step down. Do pay attention, @MMFA, @EricBoehlert!
Breitbart does not support the homosexual agenda, and none of your links show that he does.
And he doesn't at this time post at Free Republic.
If he does in the future, be sure to hit abuse on him if you dislike him so much.
He is the King of the New Media and fights tirelessly to expose corruption and the leftist agenda.
Throwing him under the bus is a big mistake.
“Look don’t make me participate in your stupid crap if you don’t like the way I do it. You make me get out of bed, you make me come over here. You make me make a phony phone call to Edward Rooney? The man could squash my n-ts into oblivion. And-and-and then, and then, you deliberately hurt my feelings.”
-Cameron from Ferris Buellers day off
Andrew Breitbart is OK.
I suspect a conversation between Cameron and Grant would be entertaining.
Thats your opinion. Normalizing the inclusion of homosexual groups, in CPAC and the conservative movement, that support homosexual marriage and the repeal of DODT does further their (GOProud's)agenda in my opinion.
And he doesn't at this time post at Free Republic.
As far as we know.
"If he does in the future, be sure to hit abuse on him if you dislike him so much.
Where did I say I disliked him?
He is the King of the New Media and fights tirelessly to expose corruption and the leftist agenda.
Throwing him under the bus is a big mistake.
Having concerns on FR over his support for GOProud is not throwing him under the bus. Its right in line with our founders boycott of CPAC due to GOProud's inclusion. CPAC does some great things too, but I will criticize them when I think they are wrong.
Jane Harmon (D-CA) left the House to join a Woodrow Wilson think tank early this year.
Of course, which is why CBS ran the story on 60 Minutes tonight. Just to be fair, they showed corruption with 1 D and 5 Rs. That's fairness according to CBS. The pubbies are 5 times more corrupt then the demonrats.
Mark
Cheers!
NO cheers, unfortunately.
Cheers!
None of your links show that Breitbart supports the homosexual agenda
If you can prove different, give it your best shot.
As far as we know.
Speak for your self.
He does not post here at this time. Don't include others in your ignorance of that fact by stating as far as WE know.
If you didn't dislike him, I don't imagine you would be vilifying him so emphatically.
You are doing more than having concerns about him.
You are throwing him under the bus.
Have all the concerns you want but get your facts straight, and if you are going to make accusations against anyone show some proof.
...Its right in line with our founders boycott of CPAC...
Who are "our" founders?
Ha ha!
I think that would be Max Baucus.
Oooh, oooh - wine on monitor!!!
Our “banner” is front and center on our main latest posts page:
“Welcome to Free Republic, America’s exclusive site for God, Family, Country, Life & Liberty conservatives!”
And if you click on it you get the full explanation:
As a conservative site, Free Republic is pro-God, pro-life, pro-family, pro-Constitution, pro-Bill of Rights, pro-gun, pro-limited government, pro-private property rights, pro-limited taxes, pro-capitalism, pro-national defense, pro-freedom, and-pro America. We oppose all forms of liberalism, socialism, fascism, pacifism, totalitarianism, anarchism, government enforced atheism, abortionism, feminism, homosexualism, racism, wacko environmentalism, judicial activism, etc. We also oppose the United Nations or any other world government body that may attempt to impose its will or rule over our sovereign nation and sovereign people. We believe in defending our BORDERS, our constitution and our national sovereignty.
Free Republic is private property. It is not a government project, nor is it funded by government or taxpayer money. We are not a publicly owned entity nor are we an IRS tax-free non-profit organization. We pay all applicable taxes on our income. We are not connected to or funded by any political party, news agency, or any other entity. We sell no merchandise, product or service, and we offer no subscriptions or paid memberships. We accept no paid advertising or promotions. We are funded solely by donations (non tax deductible gifts) from our readers and participants.
We aggressively defend our God-given and first amendment guaranteed rights to free speech, free press, free religion, and FREEDOM of ASSOCIATION, as well as our constitutional right to control the use and content of our own personal private property. Despite the wailing of the liberal trolls and other doom & gloom naysayers, we feel no compelling need to allow them a platform to promote their repugnant and obnoxious propaganda from our forum. Free Republic is NOT a liberal debating society. We are conservative activists dedicated to defending our GOD-GIVEN rights, defending our constitution, defending our republic and defending our traditional American way of Life.
Our God-given Life, Liberty and freedoms are NOT negotiable!!
For God, Family, Country, Life and Liberty!!
If you cannot live with the above, fine, but keep your mouth shut about it while on FR. Don’t fight against us on ANY of our deeply held beliefs!!
DON’T TREAD ON ME!!
FR is not a big tent big “R” site. Those who wish to support the liberal/RINO big government homosexual/abortionist agenda are certainly free to do so elsewhere.
Thank you very much.
None of your links show that Breitbart supports the homosexual agenda
Its your opinion. My opinion is that by joining the board of GOProud, promoting GOProud, and trying to force conservatives and CPAC to accept GOProud IS pushing the homosexual agenda.
"As far as we know". Speak for your self. He does not post here at this time. Don't include others in your ignorance of that fact by stating as far as WE know.
We do not know if he posts here or not. Even if you were somehow personally connected to him, you still wouldn't know for sure. Using your own words: "If you can prove different, give it your best shot."
"If you didn't dislike him, I don't imagine you would be vilifying him so emphatically."
Linking to his own words is vilifying? Criticizing his promotion of GOProud is doing so "emphatically"?
"You are doing more than having concerns about him. You are throwing him under the bus."
I have concerns about Newt, Cain, and Perry too. When they say or support something I disagree with, I say so.
"Have all the concerns you want but get your facts straight, and if you are going to make accusations against anyone show some proof."
Did you need more than the 3 links I provided to show his support for GOProud and their inclusion at CPAC?
"...Its right in line with our founders boycott of CPAC... Who are "our" founders?"
Pardon my leaving out the apostrophe. It should have read "our founder's boycott"...As to who he is, I think post 155 will explain it better than I can.
You know it!
I'd make him knock off listening to Justin Bieber.
Must be a very shallow tank -
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.