Skip to comments.You people canít seriously be thinking of zotting yet another flaming paultard retread spam monkey
Posted on 12/01/2011 2:58:00 PM PST by federal__reserve
Ron Paul: Wrong about many things, but not everything.
If a DEAD MOUSE was the GOP candidate for President against Obama - I would vote for the mouse.
Ron Paul lives in a delusional fantasy world.
As I see it, the biggest difference between Romney and Gingrich is how much either would lose by in the general election.
Unfortunately , there are many here who are serious about supporting the Pillsbury Dough Boy . I’m godsmacked , too .
..however, if that dead mouse was named Ron Paul, I may consider taking his advice from 2008 and looking at a third party candidate.
Face it, Ron Paul just has no chance at all.
Ron Paul may be delusional but this video has ACTUAL CLIPS OF NEWT HIMSELF talking. One has to be delusional to not believe what one sees and hears.
Yep. I feel the same way. We cannot do worse that Barry Hussein Soetoro Obama. Any one of those candidates (even Ron Paul) would be a huge step up. I liked Perry until he shot himself in the foot then stuck it in his mouth. Now I am thinking Huntsman is pretty solid, but he is getting zero traction. But this race is so fluid, he could be the flavor of next week.
I’ll be voting for either Bachmann or Santorium. I’m done with the circus side show.
I am with you on that 100%.
agreed....but I will vote for him(in the general) with my head held high if he is the choice against zer0bummer....
Agreed. I think my donations are going to go to house and senate members this go around. We NEED a strong, conservative House and get some more seats in the Senate. The TEA Party did the beach landing in the house in 2010. Time for us to support them further so they can whallop whatever establishment type wins in 2012.
Frankly Paul is the only one I’ve ruled out with Romney close behind him.
Regardless, whoever is the party nominee gets my vote. Even if it’s Paul. I can’t take another 4 years of the idiot Kenyan in office with his merry band of terrorists and communists in key positions.
So all of you out there in FR-Land, do what you have to do to get your guy, or gal, the nomination. Afterwards the time for whining is over.
The Establishment did a brilliant job of eliminating (i.e. smearing) all of our candidates.
The system might be full of corruption; but they are very, very good at it.
Still, we have to do *something* about the terrible mess our country is in. We can't fix our government until we break through the Establishment power and corruption.
All Perry would have to say is,”If I win the nomination,i’d tap West or Palin as my VP”,and he would surge to the front of the pack,and then some.
They've ALL done that. Why single out Perry? Frankly, I still like him, especially when set against the realistic alternatives.
You mean Pillsbury Herman Cain right?
Palin, Cain... ~Palin.. nothing else is even close.
If Cain doesn’t get the nom.. I will write in Palin, and screw all of you saying, “then you’re voting for Obama”... then so be it.
I would rather have 0bumbler in the WH to take the blame than have a RINO in the WH and the conservatives get the blame when it all falls down.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.