Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

BREAKING: Rick Perry Files Lawsuit To Get On Virginia Primary Ballot
businessinsider.com ^ | 12/27/2011 | Zeke Miller

Posted on 12/27/2011 3:48:28 PM PST by TBBT

Texas Gov. Rick Perry has filed suit in federal court against the Virginia Republican Party and the Virginia Board of Elections in order to gain a spot on the Commonwealth's primary ballot. Perry was excluded after the party found he had not submitted enough valid signatures by the deadline last Thursday. His campaign submitted 6,000 of the required 10,000, according to the suit. The lawsuit alleges that Perry's 1st and 14th Amendment rights were violated by the requirement that those circulating the petitions also be eligible or registered voters of Virginia. Failure to get on the ballot is a major embarrassment for the struggling Perry campaign — but he is not alone. Another one-time GOP frontrunner, Newt Gingrich, also failed to qualify. "Gov. Perry greatly respects the citizens and history of the Commonwealth of Virginia and believes Virginia Republicans should have greater access to vote for one of the several candidates for President of the United States," Perry communications director Ray Sullivan said in a statement. "Virginia ballot access rules are among the most onerous and are particularly problematic in a multi-candidate election. We believe that the Virginia provisions unconstitutionally restrict the rights of candidates and voters by severely restricting access to the ballot, and we hope to have those provisions overturned or modified to provide greater ballot access to Virginia voters and the candidates seeking to earn their support."

(Excerpt) Read more at businessinsider.com ...


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: 2012gopprimary; amnesty; corruption; gop; illegals; lawsuit; lawsuitabuse; openborders; perry; perry2012; politicalelite; rino; rpv; va2012; wethepeople
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200201-220221-240241-250 next last
To: John Valentine

The Code of Virginia establishes the rules by which party candidates can get on the ballot. Why is that surprising to you?

The primaries are implemented by the state, and the state has a law with rules that must be followed.

Back in may, the Virginia Board of Elections sent out a 4-page memo explaining the rules to all the candidates. That memo is published on their web site (I had a link this morning, and lost it).

The RPV is involved only in that the RPV is tasked under the law with verifying the signatures. Some have suggested that the RPV used to be lax in verification, and then there was a lawsuit, and now they were being more serious.

But the 10,000 signature requirement is in the law, it’s not something the RPV made up.


201 posted on 12/28/2011 2:03:09 AM PST by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: napscoordinator

At least he was able to submit signatures, which you’d think any serious candidate could do. Of course, Michelle Bachmann didn’t even bother.


202 posted on 12/28/2011 2:13:02 AM PST by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 142 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah
. Bill Bolling disqualified several thousand of them.

Bill Bolling had nothing to do with the volunteers checking signatures, or the RPV process for validating signatures.

I know you support Ken for governor, but he doesn't need help like this. He's a much more honorable man than you appear to be with your wild, unsupported accusations and personal attacks.

203 posted on 12/28/2011 2:15:33 AM PST by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 145 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

On the other hand, the evidence here is that you are making stuff up.


204 posted on 12/28/2011 2:18:20 AM PST by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 167 | View Replies]

To: Future Useless Eater

Yes, some have suggested that, because some are idiots.


205 posted on 12/28/2011 2:19:18 AM PST by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 176 | View Replies]

To: af_vet_rr

Well, that’s because only the serious candidates bothered.

On the other hand, somone claimed that Santorum was trying to collect signatures but came up short, which would suggest he had done the other filings necessary, but I have no evidence for that so it’s speculation.

And as far as I can tell, Michelle didn’t even declare herself a candidate here, or submit the required filings to be a candidate.


206 posted on 12/28/2011 2:21:25 AM PST by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 178 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

Not lightly, just ignorantly.


207 posted on 12/28/2011 2:22:09 AM PST by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 182 | View Replies]

To: CharlesWayneCT

Charles, the original article I read (and I admit I have not researched this at all) quoted the Virginia Code which referenced specifically the Republican Party.

The implication was that there are different rules for each of the parties, and that was what I objected to. If that is not the case, I have no issue.

From further posts, it appears that some elements of the Republican procedure are NOT mandated by the sections of the Virginia Code governing Presidential elections. It appears that this is a mess, and perhaps does offer the possibility of injunctive relief.


208 posted on 12/28/2011 3:35:36 AM PST by John Valentine (Deep in the Heart of Texas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 201 | View Replies]

To: EDINVA

EDINVA, is the proviso that Ron Paul and Mitt Romney are exempted from verification because they each presented more than 15,000 raw signatures part of the Virginia Code as well?


209 posted on 12/28/2011 3:39:14 AM PST by John Valentine (Deep in the Heart of Texas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 164 | View Replies]

To: Quicksilver
voters simply switch parties before the cut-off date to vote

In a closed primary state, not many are going to go through the time & trouble of registering back and forth between primaries and general elections (and it wouldn't be hard to prohibit such behavior if it became a problem). I moved to VA from CA where, thankfully, an open primary concept was rejected by the voters - one thing CA does right.

Here in VA, an open primary greases the skids for nominating someone the majority of Republicans don't want. This to me is just as big an issue and problem and this signature fiasco.

210 posted on 12/28/2011 5:11:40 AM PST by PapaNew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 169 | View Replies]

To: JulieRNR21; bevperl
I called FNC comment line to inform them about the recent VA GOP Rule changes:

1-888-369-4762 Press 3 then 1 to leave a comment.

I also called FOX for what it is worth. Let them know it is disturbing that they continue to leave out facts in their reporting about the VA ballot access problem for Newt and Perry. Perhaps after they do get ballot access the truth will come out. I left my message including the following facts.

1. The VA ballot access rules were changed to require that the persons collecting the petitions must be VA residents/voters, which means Newt and Perry could not have volunteers from outside VA help collect petitions.

2. The VA ballot access rules were changed to require that 400 petitions had to be collected from EACH of the 11 VA districts.

3. The VA ballot access rules were changed to require that the petitions must be signed by REGISTERED VA voters, NOT just RESIDENTS of VA.

4. There has been little mention of the number of petitions Newt's campaign has turned in, but Rick Perry's campaign turned in about 11,900 petitions NOT 6,000 as has been reported in order to say his campaign was “NOT ORGANIZED like Ron Paul and Mitt Romney”.

5. The reason Ron Paul and Mitt Romney are already on the VA ballot is because they ran in the 2008 election NOT because they were “MORE ORGANIZED” than Newt or Perry.

I am pleased that Perry and Newt will challenge the VA changes in their ballot access rules. Newt and Perry should be allowed on the VA ballot if they have turned in the 10,000 required petitions signed by VA residents.

211 posted on 12/28/2011 5:11:48 AM PST by seekthetruth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 179 | View Replies]

To: TexMom7
It's a rare event indeed when Perri Caliente has an interest that coincides with my interests ~ he has yet to tell us that Americans should always come first in America, and Mexicans should go to Mexico to be first.

It's all very simple.

212 posted on 12/28/2011 5:22:15 AM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 185 | View Replies]

To: CharlesWayneCT
Hey, a few days ago I supported Bob for Governor then I found out he, Bolling and our RNC state chairman were as corrupt as any Chicago politician ever has been.

They got WIPED OFF THE LIST.

I prefer ELECTIONS to SELECTIONS by greasy palmed in smoke filled rooms.

213 posted on 12/28/2011 5:29:23 AM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 203 | View Replies]

To: CharlesWayneCT
Hey, a few days ago I supported Bob for Governor then I found out he, Bolling and our RNC state chairman were as corrupt as any Chicago politician ever has been.

They got WIPED OFF THE LIST.

I prefer ELECTIONS to SELECTIONS by greasy palmed politicians meeting secretly in smoke filled rooms.

214 posted on 12/28/2011 5:29:50 AM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 203 | View Replies]

To: CharlesWayneCT
Bolling, the state chairman of Romney's Virginia campaign ~ he even filed Romney's paperwork, and the signatures on those petitions.

He's also the Lt. Governor.

He knew!

215 posted on 12/28/2011 5:32:26 AM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 203 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing
A hissy fit?

Our top leadership in the Commonwealth of Virginia declared war on Republican Voters!

What do you expect?

It is time to retake Richmond ~ and just like Lincoln we know what to do.

216 posted on 12/28/2011 5:38:32 AM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 191 | View Replies]

To: trumandogz
Essentially all Perri Caliente is asking the courts to do is enforce their previous order but in his case. That's a very simple argument to make (which is undoubtedly why he chose to make that one), and it's a really good court to cite ~ since it's the Supreme Court.

So, now, "The Cooch" will need to respond to that on behalf of the Commonwealth ...... and he literally has it in his power to RUIN Romney.

217 posted on 12/28/2011 5:42:23 AM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 187 | View Replies]

To: LUV W
This primary cycle has become a Keystone Kops movie.

My take is the opposite. This is showing up the establishment, they are really having a hard time shoving their "it's his turn" candidate down our throats. It is a hopeful sigh of a complete RINO die-out.

218 posted on 12/28/2011 5:48:03 AM PST by central_va ( I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Taking Congress back in 2010
Perry’s only hope is to get an activist judge who will legislate from the bench rather than implement the Virginia law. Perry is only conservative when it is convienent. Posting HTML This forum allows optional use of most HTML tags. If your post does not contain HTML, it will be converted to HTML when posted, retaining paragraphs as typed. This conversion is not performed if you have anything resembling an HTML tag in your text.

Some people think you're an idiot...keep posting and you'll remove all doubt.

219 posted on 12/28/2011 5:56:37 AM PST by pgkdan ("Make what Americans buy, Buy what Americans make, and sell it to the world" Perry 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: moehoward
got their heads so far up Mitt's rump, they're gargling Grecian formula.

LOL! That's the line of the day!

220 posted on 12/28/2011 6:00:11 AM PST by pgkdan ("Make what Americans buy, Buy what Americans make, and sell it to the world" Perry 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200201-220221-240241-250 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson