Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Globe Magazine : Duchess Kate Breaks Down & Collapses 12/29/2011
Globe Magazine ^ | 12/29/2011

Posted on 01/03/2012 10:40:47 AM PST by SandRat

According to the latest issue of Globe magazine, Duchess of Cambridge, has broken down and/or collapsed! Let’s hope the rumors aren’t true!

The magazine reports that Kate was left in tears after her step-mother-in-law, the Duchess of Cornwallcruelly insulted her. What did she say?!?

DETAILS! Reportedly, Camilla was teasing the Duchess about her husband, Prince William's faithfulness. Ugh, can you believe that? Pot meet kettle, anyone?


TOPICS: Chit/Chat
KEYWORDS: camilla; duchess; insult; kate; unitedkingdom
Watch for Duchess Camilla to let the insults fly if the Queen passes to Crown to Prince Williamand not Prince Charles, making Kate the Queen and not Camilla.
1 posted on 01/03/2012 10:40:50 AM PST by SandRat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SandRat

What is a rat’s ass? Answer: what I don’t give about anything connected with so-called royalty any where in the Universe.


2 posted on 01/03/2012 10:44:18 AM PST by olrtex
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SandRat
Also, a body was found on the Queen's Estate. Murder victim.

If it was Charles, would we know?

3 posted on 01/03/2012 10:44:32 AM PST by donozark (Ron Paul! You magnificent bastard! I read your book! (cook book that is))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SandRat

Neither Duchess Camilla or Kate will ever be Queen, They are not in the blood line. Prince William or Prince Charles can be crowned kings because they are in the Blood line.


4 posted on 01/03/2012 10:47:22 AM PST by Garvin (When it comes to my freedom, there will be no debate. There will be a fight)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SandRat

My thanks to George Washington, Thomas Paine, Thomas Jefferson, Ben Franklin and all the other great American patriots who deciding to break away from these inbreds, back in 1776.


5 posted on 01/03/2012 10:48:29 AM PST by Signalman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SandRat

People have been unemployed for over a year. Some people are wondering if they will have enough money to pay the mortgage. Count me among those who could care less if this little princess breaks down in tears because some old hag makes a catty comment to her.


6 posted on 01/03/2012 10:49:18 AM PST by Opinionated Blowhard ("When the people find they can vote themselves money, that will herald the end of the republic.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Signalman
deciding decided.
7 posted on 01/03/2012 10:50:08 AM PST by Signalman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: donozark

“If it was Charles, would we know?”
Does it have jug ears.? Does it look like Alferd E. Neuman?


8 posted on 01/03/2012 10:55:04 AM PST by duckman (Herman 2012 was Zero's worst night mare.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SandRat
Speaking as someone of Irish descent, who the feck cares?


9 posted on 01/03/2012 10:55:57 AM PST by katana (Just my opinions)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: katana

How did you get my operator’s license picture?


10 posted on 01/03/2012 10:58:55 AM PST by donozark (Ron Paul! You magnificent bastard! I read your book! (cook book that is))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: SandRat

First, I doubt this happened.

Second, even assuming it did, I’m having an amusing time trying to figure out how War Horse the Homewrecker might credibly insult Kate.


11 posted on 01/03/2012 11:00:38 AM PST by RichInOC (Palin 2012: The Perfect Storm.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Garvin

Wrong

The wife of a crowned King (with rare exceptions, although one may be operative in Camilla’s case), the wife of a crowned King is the Queen. Upon the king’s death, she relinquishes her title as Queen and becomes Queen Mother.

The husband of a crowned Queen, on the other hand, is not King, unless he happened to be King of another country.

The crowned Queen’s husband is her Consort, and she may bestow other titles on his if she chooses.


12 posted on 01/03/2012 11:02:57 AM PST by MindBender26 (Don't bother me with the small stuff. I'm too busy trying to save the Republic from Obamaism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SandRat

No wonder Charles was always so taken with Camilla. She matches him in manners, style and grace.


13 posted on 01/03/2012 11:06:24 AM PST by colorado tanker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: donozark

Ah, Father Jack is it? Now go on, go on, go on, go on ... with ya.


14 posted on 01/03/2012 11:09:12 AM PST by katana (Just my opinions)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: SandRat

Well Kate must have recovered pretty fast as she was photographed dancing up a storm New Year’s Eve at her family’s big tent party.


15 posted on 01/03/2012 11:09:45 AM PST by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: naturalman1975

Have you seen this?


16 posted on 01/03/2012 11:21:44 AM PST by SandRat (Duty - Honor - Country! What else needs said?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: donozark
Also, a body was found on the Queen's Estate. Murder victim

If it was Charles, would we know?

If Prince Charles has been killed, the news will get out sooner or later. People will start to ask why he isn't appearing at any ribbon-cutting events.

17 posted on 01/03/2012 11:22:35 AM PST by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SandRat
Does the queen have the right, under the British constitution, to pass the throne to anyone other than the first person in the line of succession?

I think the last time anyone tried to monkey with the order of succession, other than the Glorious Revolution which meant ousting a reigning king and excluding his new-born son from the succession, was the failed attempt to put Lady Jane Grey on the throne when Edward VI died in 1553.

18 posted on 01/03/2012 11:26:55 AM PST by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Signalman

“My thanks to George Washington, Thomas Paine, Thomas Jefferson, Ben Franklin and all the other great American patriots who deciding to break away from these inbreds, back in 1776.”

That is what makes this thread worth it!!! Thank you!!!


19 posted on 01/03/2012 11:27:56 AM PST by Morgana (I only come here to see what happens next. It normally does.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SandRat
Watch for Duchess Camilla to let the insults fly if the Queen passes to Crown to Prince Williamand not Prince Charles, making Kate the Queen and not Camilla.

The Queen has no control over the succession, which was set by Parliament in the Act of Settlement in 1701. The Queen does not even have the right to abdicate without Parliament's approval.
20 posted on 01/03/2012 11:27:56 AM PST by Cheburashka (If life hands you lemons, government regulations will prevent you from making lemonade.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SandRat
Preggers
21 posted on 01/03/2012 11:28:14 AM PST by BenLurkin (This is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire; or both)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Verginius Rufus
Does the queen have the right, under the British constitution, to pass the throne to anyone other than the first person in the line of succession?

See post #20.
22 posted on 01/03/2012 11:31:44 AM PST by Cheburashka (If life hands you lemons, government regulations will prevent you from making lemonade.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: SandRat

Camilla appears to be a real (fill in your favorite descriptor here).


23 posted on 01/03/2012 11:34:24 AM PST by 2 Kool 2 Be 4-Gotten
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SandRat

We need to examine the evidence! There is no evidence posted on this thread.


24 posted on 01/03/2012 12:02:07 PM PST by frithguild (Restricting access to capital - Liberalism: The sharpest tool of big business.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: katana

I did hear once that an Irishman will never bite off more than he can chew. Unless its an Englishman’s leg.


25 posted on 01/03/2012 12:02:15 PM PST by NavyCanDo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]





I May Be a Birdbrain
But Smart FReepers Donate Monthly
To Abolish FReepathons



26 posted on 01/03/2012 12:08:58 PM PST by TheOldLady (FReepmail me to get ON or OFF the ZOT LIGHTNING ping list)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Verginius Rufus
I think the last time anyone tried to monkey with the order of succession, other than the Glorious Revolution which meant ousting a reigning king and excluding his new-born son from the succession, was the failed attempt to put Lady Jane Grey on the throne when Edward VI died in 1553.

Although there was that whole bit with the Establishment forcing the King to abdicate in 1936 rather than give up his bimbo.

Which Winston Churchill fought bitterly, BTW.

27 posted on 01/03/2012 12:29:27 PM PST by Sherman Logan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]





I May Be a Birdbrain
But Smart FReepers Donate Monthly
To Abolish FReepathons



28 posted on 01/03/2012 12:31:02 PM PST by TheOldLady (FReepmail me to get ON or OFF the ZOT LIGHTNING ping list)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SandRat

Stupid and certainly untrue.


29 posted on 01/03/2012 1:23:51 PM PST by ottbmare (off-the-track Thoroughbred mare)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SandRat

At some point in the not-to-distant future the Saracens in Britain will drag the entire Royal Family into Picadilly Square and behead them.


30 posted on 01/03/2012 1:59:10 PM PST by jmacusa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: katana

“Drink! Feck! Gurls!!


31 posted on 01/03/2012 2:00:22 PM PST by jmacusa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: SandRat; donozark; Garvin
A few comments from somebody who knows quite a few of the Royal family quite well.

Is it possible that the Duchess of Cornwall might have said something to the Duchess of Cambridge that upset her? Yes, it is. The Royal family is a family and the same tensions and conflicts that can pop up in any family can happen in the Royal family. But relationships between the two of them are generally good, and they do like each other, so I would find it difficult to believe anything truly significant has happened here.

The Queen does not have the power to decide who succeeds her. That decisions is in the hands of Parliament. At the moment, if the Queen should die or abdicate, Charles, the Prince of Wales will become King and Camilla, Duchess of Cambridge, will become Queen Consort as a matter of law (although she may continue to use the style Duchess of Cambridge, just as she currently does even though she is legally the Princess of Wales). Even if Charles immediately abdicated in favour of his son which some people think might happen (I don't at this stage - if Charles doesn't come to the throne until he's 80, maybe), he would still be King until the instrument of abdication took effect and Camilla would still legally be Queen.

Frankly, I do not believe Camilla has any great desire to be Queen. She will do her duty when her husband becomes King, but it's not something that is important to her.

Further comments - in terms of Garvin's that neither Camilla nor Kate will ever be Queen because they are not in the bloodline, there are four different types of Queens. The Queen Regnant (which is what Elizabeth II is, what Victoria was, and what Elizabeth I was, among others) rules in their own right and they must be the Heir by blood to take on that role. But the wife of a King is also a Queen - a Queen Consort. Queen Elizabeth, the wife of King George VI (later the Queen Mother) and Queen Mary, the wife of King George V, are the two most recent examples of these. The third type of Queen is a Dowager Queen. This is a Queen Consort whose King predeceases her. So both Queen Mary (wife of George V) and Queen Elizabeth (wife of George VI) became Dowager Queens on the death of their husbands. The fourth type of Queen is Queen Mother, which refers to a Queen who is the mother of the current Monarch. George VI's wife, Queen Elizabeth used this title from the death of George VI in 1952 until her own death in 2002. (Queen Mary was technically the Queen Mother from 1936 till 1952 when her son died, but she chose not to use that style, instead continuing to be Queen Mary - Queen Elizabeth, the Queen Mother, naturally needed a way to distinguish herself from her daughter of the same name and so did use the title).

As for the body found at Sandringham, yes it was found on the Royal Estate. But the royal estate is 20,000 acres in size, part of which is land open to the public with hundreds of people travelling through it most days and with people actually living on it in normal English villages. There's no reason to think there's any link with the Royal Family. It may just be it was seen by somebody as a good place to try and dump a body.

32 posted on 01/03/2012 3:22:03 PM PST by naturalman1975 ("America was under attack. Australia was immediately there to help." - John Winston Howard)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson