Skip to comments.If I could IMPLORE my fellow FreePs and Conservatives...
Posted on 01/05/2012 12:00:45 PM PST by US Navy Vet
PLEASE PLEASE VOTE in November! DO NO SIT ON YOUR HANDS this time! If you cannot stomach(Paul, Rommney) leave the Presidential Block vacant but vote down ballot, VOTE!
Down ballot can be just as, if not more so important. But the potential Pres. voting block is looking fairly unpalatable.
Agree, vote and get involved. There are many many more races than just President. We need a veto proof Tea Party Congress and majorities in the states.
Guys like Boner and McConman need to go. Primaries are coming. No excuses not to get involved.
Except Willard. As far as he's concerned, bash away.
Comparing records is fine, but no more juvenile name calling & cheap shots.
I would say this: before you don’t vote for POTUS or do a third party thing, ask yourself if you want two or three more Kagans and Sotomayors on the Supreme Court.
Of course I’ll vote down ballot, but it will be up to Karl Rove and the Establishment to carry their boy Romney because I ain’t votin’ for him if he is the nominee.
There will be NO holding my nose and voting for Romney. There will be no, “where wlse will they go” voting. Where else will I go? I will leave that slot open and not cast a ballot.
I’m off the “be a good foot soldier” reservation.
I’ll vote for every thing else if Romney is the nominee for president, I will leave that mark blank.
Thank You, I do agree with vote down the Ballot, but thats the most I can Stomach.
That’s what I plan on doing.
I refuse choke on Romney’s c_ _ _ in 2012 but I will be voting for other races and any local ballot stuff. Hopefully, we can get the senate.
If I have to, I’ll write myself in for prez.
Maybe Mickey Mouse will finally win.
I always vote, I just won’t be voting for Romney.
I will vote for a lawn gnome (for President) if that prevents two more Sotomayor/ Kagan type Justices. Yes, even for Mitt, but just damn, I hope it won’t come to that.
If Romney gets the nod, I am writing in “Jimmy Carter” since he would be an improvement over the clown that holds office now. We are also not voting for any incumbents from the local races through the senate. It is time to impose a one term limit on these elitists.
I concur, and that’s just about the ONLY reason (that I could vote for a Romney). But it’s a HUGE reason. :/ I sometimes wish that the system were not so clearly “two party,” but that’s not going to change anytime soon — and we’ve all seen what happened when Ross Perot ran in 1992. We got Breyer and Ginsburg. (Sure, GOP presidents sometimes pick liberals on SCOTUS, but liberal presidents ALWAYS ALWAYS pick liberals.)
If you DO vote for Mitt then you WILL get 2 more Sotomayor/ Kagan type Justices, GARANTEED!
I don’t think it’s guaranteed. Quite the contrary. One of the only good things about Mitt is that Robert Bork is head of his judicial selection committee. (I suppose Bork could simply be “being exploited,” but Bork is no fool. I have to believe that Bork is convinced that EVEN Romney would not pick Souters or worse.)
Vote. Get Involved. And if you feel the calling....RUN!!!!!
While you're at it ask yourself if you want to be ruled by a Kenyan Mau-Mau.
It’s ok to be juvenile when Romney is involved?
I will not vote for Paul, Romney or Huntsman.
But I will vote in the down ballot races.
As if Romneys’ picks would be any better.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.