>>They’ve analyzed “Native American” DNA, and it turns out that they’re Chinese.
China didn’t exist when the native americans crossed over from Asia. They obviously share a lot of common ancestry, but calling them “Chinese” is bad science and bad anthropology.
China didn’t exist? Wow. China rose up out of the sea a few hundred years ago? Maybe they’re actually Atlantians from Atlantis, or Atlanta. Maybe they were all just treading water over there waiting for some land to come along so they could put up a great wall. I think it’s very presumptive of you to say I have bad science and bad anthropology. Maybe my science and anthropology had tough childhoods. What about that? Do you go around saying “Oh, he has bad sociology and bad botany” to people? You can scar a kid with talk like that. Have a little respect for other people’s feelings around here, if you please, or I’ll report you to the moderators for hurting my self-esteem.
P.S. - that still doesn’t make them “Natives”.
"The oldest human remains found in the Americas were recently "discovered" in the storeroom of Mexico's National Museum of Anthropology. Found in central Mexico in 1959, the five skulls were radiocarbon dated by a team of researchers from the United Kingdom and Mexico and found to be 13,000 years old. They pre-date the Clovis culture by a couple thousand years, adding to the growing evidence against the Clovis-first model for the first peopling of the Americas.
Of additional significance is the shape of the skulls, which are described as long and narrow, very unlike those of modern Native Americans.