Where have all the people gone? (vanity)

Bureau of Labor Statistics ^ | January 15, 2012 | US Government

[FreeAtlanta]

Data extracted on: January 15, 2012 (11:22:34 AM)

Labor Force Statistics from the Current Population Survey

Series Id: LNS11000000
Seasonally Adjusted
Series title: (Seas) Civilian Labor Force Level
Labor force status: Civilian labor force
Type of data: Number in thousands
Age: 16 years and over

[Leep]

Many have become collectors..they are collecting a gmint check.
When they are not busy collecting a gmint check they are in the sign making business...as in, “will work for food” to help suppliment their “free” income.

Don’t be surprized when the MSM reports the economy “unexectentedly crashed overnight” because its been 3+ years in the making.

[null and void]

the missing population - extrapolating the graph - is about 30 million people.

Oddly enough, this number is roughly the same as the number of illegal aliens that were said to be in this country at the start of the Obama regime...

[aldabra]

Please bear with me as I work my way to how people are dropped out of the civilian labor force.

The BLS produces two sets of unemployment statistics:
* CPS (Current Population Survey) or Household Survey Data which is found in the A tables of the empsit, and
* CES (Current Employment Situation) or Establishment Survey data which is found in the B tables of the empsit Employment Situation.

Each month the BLS surveys 60,000 households by phone. The results are put through various stastical tools and produce the CPS or Household data. This is the source of the unemployment rate. Whether or not one is collecting unemployment insurance is not considered in producing the unemployment rate.

Each month BLS also surveys approximately 150,000 businesses and government agencies representing approximately 390,000 worksites throughout the United States. The results are also put various statistical tools and produce the CES or Payroll / Establishment data . This is the source of the number of jobs gained / lost, hours worked, and earnings. Because some businesses are late in sending in their information, the payroll data is subject to monthly revisions.

The number of people collecting unemployment affects the annual benchmark revisions to the Establishment / Payroll data which "are derived primarily from employment counts reported on unemployment insurance (UI) tax reports that nearly all employers are required to file with State Workforce Agencies".

* In 1994, under Clinton a major redesign of the CPS was released. Part of the redesign was to drop people out of the civilian labor force if they were considered 'discouraged' and were unemployed for over one year. Prior to the redesign, you were considered unemployed if you wanted to find a job, even if you were 'discouraged'.

Not counting the long term discouraged unemployed as part of the civilian labor force makes the unemployment rate look better, better but is reflected in the ever diminishing participation rate.

I have not been able to locate documentation detailing exactly how the BLS determines one has been discouraged for more than a year. [Some discouraged workers are counted in the U-4, U-5, and U-6 number; others are moved out of the civilian labor force but listed as wanting a job.]

[CodeToad]

Excellent graph. I just researched the same thing last week and found they were excluding people for reasons unknown.

About 2 million people each year turn 18, yet, the number of working age people declined under Obama’s administration. This is an outright lie.

My only conclusion if these numbers were right is that the Baby Boomer population is retiring and they are a huge part of the population. However, 10,000 baby boomers have a birthday each day, so that is 3.65 million peope leaving the workforce each year, but many baby boomers are still working well past 68 to make ends meet.

So, we still have a major gaps in the numbers. If baby boomers are working then there are more unemployed than is being counted.

[aldabra]

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/2833248/posts?page=23#23

[FreeAtlanta]

I am expecting all these missing people to be added back in if Obama looses. They might trickle them in, or add them all at the same time about a 3 years into the new administration.

I really hate dishonest people. I know hate is a strong word and I shouldn’t hate people, but dishonesty really gets under my skin.

[aldabra]

If you haven’t seen i, info you might be interested in:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/2833248/posts?page=23#23

[FreeAtlanta]

Thanks aldabra.

Without all the intricate details that would put most of the American population to sleep, our candidates need to be showing this graph and asking the American population, “What is Obama doing with the missing people?” Using a TV ad and some simple graphics showing the extrapolation, this should be a nice big dagger to the heart.

People have or are loosing trust in this “Transparent” administration. Graphs like this will add to the defeat by a thousand cuts.

This is why I supported the “Birther” stuff. It showed the incredible dishonesty and dubiousness of Obama.

[PghBaldy]

You are right about the lie in using this as a baseline in UE. Really, they should use another means to get at that, as many of the people who are gone are truly unemployed.

[PghBaldy]

OK- the earliest I can easily find are for 1940 figures of Civilian Labor Force

http://www.nber.org/databases/macrohistory/contents/chapter08.html

(I think there are ealier figures, perhaps the Federal Reserve of St Louis has them - they have MANY older docs)

[PghBaldy]

OK- I WAS WRONG — In the Great Depression, the Total Civilian Labor Force INCREASED (which is amazing, considering the population wasn’t growing like before or after)... Here is the PDF: p24 of 134

fraser.stlouisfed.org/docs/publications/employment/1960s/empl_051966.pdf

It is several (9.3 MB) of data - 134 pages, for anyone interested.

[GreenAccord]

Can someone verify for me if ANY of the images from the BLS website are displaying on their browsers? Neither my Firefox and Chrome browsers show any of the images.

[PghBaldy]

1st column YEAR
2nd column TOTAL LABOR FORCE (in thousands);
3rd column TOTAL CIVILIAN LABOR FORCE (in thousands)

1929 49,440 49,180
1930 50,080 49,820
1931 50,680 50,420
1932 51,250 51,000
1933 51,840 51,590

1934 52,490 52,230
1935 53,140 52,870
1936 53,740 53,440
1937 54,320 54,000
1938 54,950 54,610

1939 55,600 55,230
1940 56,180 55,640
1941 57,530 55,910

p24 of 134 fraser.stlouisfed.org/docs/publications/employment/1960s/empl_051966.pdf

[BfloGuy]

Thank you for the detailed explanation. It’s a shame you can’t get on Limbaugh — he gets this labor force/unemployment thing all screwed up.

[FreeAtlanta]

So, the trend even through the Great Depression was still an increase in labor force.

What in the name of the end of the world are we going through now? Is it actually worse than the great depression, but is being artificially hidden?

I am more concerned now than I was before I saw your numbers.

[FreedomPoster]

They are not showing up for me, either.

Looking at the image URLs, it looks like they might be dynamically generated and time out/disappear after a time.

FreeAtlanta, it looks like you need to capture the images and host them yourself for them to be permanent.

[GreenAccord]

Thanks for the validation on that.

[surfer]

What we are going through...

It’s called ask an actuarial about a math formula and you will always get the response...what answer do you want it to be?

[FreeAtlanta]

Those sneaky bastages.

I thought it added more credibility if I linked to their lying data directly. I will rerun the graphs and post.

Thanks!

[FreeAtlanta]

I posted these up on bahits.

I hope this helps. Thanks, FreeAtlanta