THINK: The reason she is not complying and hiring a lawyer is because she CAN'T comply. There is no BC on the microfilm.
The documentation in the HIDOH was created with the adoption (If a child from China is adopted in the US, a BC is created for the adoptive parents here. It contains their name and date of birth if known and is issued in the court, county, state where the adoption takes place. Any documentation of live birth stays at place of birth.)
Check with your local recorders office. Sometimes when adoptions take place instead of placing them just when the adoption occurs they sometimes cross reference them within the time frame of the actual birth. It makes it easier to find. People remember their birth-date, but date of adoption is not as significant.
Is this making sense?
I know that Hawaii law allows adoption records to be unsealed on the court order of any US court, so if Malihi did order the production of the documents and the HDOH doesn’t comply that might be the next question that would get asked, rather than slapping a contempt of court charge against Fuddy.
But I’m wondering if the judge is leaving it in Obama’s hands; if he produces the necessary documentation (whatever the judge thinks that is, and that could be really problematic if the judge is either corrupt or corruptible) then Obama will be on the ballot and if not he won’t.