Skip to comments.VIDEO: The Birther's Victory In Atlanta Court
Posted on 01/26/2012 7:46:55 PM PST by OUTKAST
arl Swensson on the victory in Atlanta Court. Recorded on 26 January 2012.
For those of us who don’t have the time sit through the whole video, does anyone know what happened? There are no headlined on Drudge, google or Yahoo, so I assume nothing happened.
This is an interview on what happened
Neither Obama nor his lawyer showed up. Malihi met with the plaintiffs and told them he was going to issue a summary judgment against Obama; the plaintiffs asked and the judge agreed to have an abbreviated hearing so the evidence could be in the record, which they did. Taitz asked Judge Malihi to charge Obama with contempt of court. No official word from Mahili yet, as far as I know.
From what I understand, the judge adjourned without making any decision, so I guess it was a victory in the sense that it wasn’t tossed out completely.
That’s not going to get any champagne corks popping.
There was a good thread posted this morning. Basically, Obama defaulted.
This was from the earlier thread just mentioned:
Read more at: http://www.thenationalpatriot.com/?p=4138. By Craig Andresen.
Court is called to order.
Obamas birth certificate is entered into evidence.
Obamas fathers place of birth, Kenya East Africa is entered into evidence.
Pages 214 and 215 from Obamas book, Dreams from My Father entered into evidence. Highlighted. This is where Obama indicates that, in 1966 or 1967 that his fathers history is mentioned. It states that his fathers passport had been revoked and he was unable to leave Kenya.
Immigration Services documents entered into evidence regarding Obama Sr.
June 27th, 1962, is the date on those documents. Obamas fathers status shown as a non citizen of the United States. Documents were gotten through the Freedom of Information Act.
Testimony regarding the definition of Natural Born Citizen is given citing Minor vs Happersett opinion from a Supreme Court written opinion from 1875. The attorney points out the difference between citizen and Natural Born Citizen using charts and copies of the Minor vs Happersett opinion.
It is also pointed out that the 14th Amendment does not alter the definition or supersede the meaning of Natural Born. It is pointed out that lower court rulings do not conflict with the Supreme Court opinion nor do they over rule the Supreme Court Minor vs Happersett opinion.
The point is, to be a natural born citizen, one must have 2 parents who, at the time of the birth in question, be citizens of the United States. As Obamas father was not a citizen, the argument is that Obama, constitutionally, is ineligible to serve as President.
Judge notes that as Obama nor his attorney is present, action will be taken accordingly.
Carl Swinson takes the stand.
Testimony is presented that the SOS has agreed to hear this case, laws applicable, and that the DNC of Georgia will be on the ballot and the challenge to it by Swinson.
2nd witness, a Mr. Powell, takes the stand and presents testimony regarding documents of challenge to Obamas appearance on the Georgia ballot and his candidacy.
Court records of Obamas mother and father entered into evidence.
Official certificate of nomination of Obama entered into evidence.
RNC certificate of nomination entered into evidence.
DNC language does NOT include language stating Obama is Qualified while the RNC document DOES. This shows a direct difference trying to establish that the DNC MAY possibly have known that Obama was not qualified.
Jablonski letter to Kemp yesterday entered into evidence showing their desire that these proceedings not take place and that they would not participate.
Dreams From My Father entered.
Mr. Allen from Tuscon AZ sworn in.
Disc received from Immigration and Naturalization Service entered into evidence. This disc contains information regarding the status of Obamas father received through the Freedom of Information Act.
This information states clearly that Obamas father was NEVER a U.S. Citizen.
At this point, the judge takes a recess.
The judge returns.
David Farrar takes the stand.
Evidence showing Obamas book of records listing his nationality as Indoneasan. Deemed not relevant by the judge.
Orly Taitz calls 2nd witness. Mr. Strump.
Enters into evidence a portion of letter received from attorney showing a renewal form from Obamas mother for her passport listing Obamas last name something other than Obama.
State Licensed PI takes the stand.
She was hired to look into Obamas background and found a Social Security number for him from 1977. Professional opinion given that this number was fraudulent. The number used or attached to Obama in 1977, shows that Obama was born in the 1890. This shows that the number was originally assigned to someone else who was indeed born in 1890 and should never have been used by Obama.
Same SS number came up with addresses in IL, D.C. and MA.
Next witness takes the stand.
This witness is an expert in information technology and photo shop. He testifies that the birth certificate Obama provided to the public is layered, multiple layered. This, he testifies, indicates that different parts of the certificate have been lifted from more than one original document.
Linda Jordan takes the stand.
Document entered regarding SS number assigned to Obama. SS number is not verified under E Verify. It comes back as suspected fraudulent. This is the system by which the Government verifies ones citizenship.
Expert in document imaging and scanners for 18 years.
Mr. Gogt testifies that the birth certificate, posted online by Obama, is suspicious. States white lines around all the type face is caused by unsharp mask in Photoshop. Testifies that any document showing this, is considered to be a fraud.
States this is a product of layering.
Mr. Gogt testifies that a straight scan of an original document would not show such layering.
Also testifies that the date stamps shown on Obama documents should not be in exact same place on various documents as they are hand stamped. Obamas documents are all even, straight and exactly the same indicating they were NOT hand stamped by layered into the document by computer.
Next witness, Mr. Sampson a former police officer and former immigration officer specializing in immigration fraud.
Ran Obamas SS number through database and found that the number was issued to Obama in 1977 in the state of Connecticut . Obama never resided in that state. At the time of issue, Obama was living in Hawaii.
Serial number on birth certificate is out of sequence with others issued at that hospital. Also certification is different than others and different than twins born 24 hours ahead of Obama.
Mr. Sampson also states that portion of documents regarding Mr. Sotoroe, who adopted Obama have been redacted which is highly unusual with regards to immigration records.
Suggests all records from Social Security, Immigration, Hawaii birth records be made available to see if there are criminal charges to be filed or not. Without them, nothing can be ruled out.
Mr. Sampson indicates if Obama is shown not to be a citizen, he should be arrested and deported and until all records are released nobody can know for sure if he is or is not a U.S. Citizen.
Taitz shows records for Barry Sotoro aka Barack Obama, showing he resides in Hawaii and in Indonesia at the same time.
Taitz takes the stand herself.
Testifies that records indicate Obama records have been altered and he is hiding his identity and citizenship.
Taitz leave the stand to make her closing arguments.
Taitz states that Obama should be found, because of the evidence presented, ineligible to serve as President.
And with that, the judge closes the hearing.
Well..... I grilled steaks tonight and we’re getting ready to eat pineapple cream pie and coconut cream pie here at our house - to celebrate that there is still apparently one honest judge in the country.
Wish I could treat all my fellow patriots here. The kids tell me I make pretty good pie... lol
Good video, terrible title.
This is not a “Birther” victory.
This is a “Eligibility” victory due to BHO, Jr. not being a Natural Born Citizen as required by the Constitution.
It has nothing to do with where he was born, and we still do not know where that is.
It is a victory driven by his terminal arrogance. When the default judgement is actually signed I will breath a sigh of relief.
At long last a little sanity is on display in Georgia! Finally introducd into evidence is this snippet:
“His fathers citizenship, they said, precludes him from serving as president, since the Founders required that officer to be a natural-born citizen, not just a citizen.
The term is not defined in the Constitution, but evidence introduced included a passage from a 1875 Supreme Court opinion that states:The Constitution does not in words say who shall be natural-born citizens. Resort must be had elsewhere to ascertain that. At common law, with the nomenclature of which the framers of the Constitution were familiar, it was never doubted that all children born in a country of parents who were its citizens became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also. These were natives or natural-born citizens, as distinguished from aliens or foreigners.
Weldon explained in his presentation that the 14th Amendment granting citizenship did not redefine Article 2, Section 1 of the U.S. Constitution, which includes the requirement for a president to be a natural-born citizen.
The attorney argued also that another later court case referenced citizenship in the dicta, not the central holding in the case, and thus was not controlling.
This is what the term “natural-born” actually means - “natural-born” is a concept of natural law borrowed from the British that stipulates that, in order for someone to be a natural-born citizen, their parents determine their actual citizenship status. Under the terms of the law, 60% of an individual’s citizenship comes from the citizenhip of the father, with the remainder coming from the mother’s citizenship.
In Obama’s case, then, he was not eligible to be POTUS because, although his mother was American, his father was Kenyan. The place of his birth (alledgedly Hawaii), is immaterial in this case because he is not, according to the definition, a “natural-born” citizen as required by the 14th Amendment!!
Canada Free Press:
Who will save Freedom?
A brave few This is how it was in the beginning, how it has always been and how it will be.
...Orly Taitz, who has made defending the Constitution and the American way of life a personal ambition, in the absence of any constitutional leadership.
Even if this procedure does not yield the desired resukt for the Plaintiffs, the issue of the suspicious SSN has to be answered.
But the issue was recorded in the proceedings.
It is TIME to open the can of worms. Once open it is like opening Pandora’s Box. Only God knows the outcome from there.
I'll do a bit more celebrating than that, but I won't hold my breath in the meantime.
We aren't seeing it, but I am sure that judge is getting a lot of pressure from a multitude of sources. Every judge so far has geeked, the chances of this one coming through are, sadly, not really that good.
I think Obama and CO blew this off because they can. They know something.. Something that will make the judge side with them, or perhaps.. even darker.. Make the judge go away (gitmo?) before a verdict is reached.
"RNC certificate of nomination entered into evidence. DNC language does NOT include language stating Obama is Qualified while the RNC document DOES.What became of the idiot's mandate in Hawaii ordering Orly there on the same day as this hearing?
This shows a direct difference trying to establish that the DNC MAY possibly have known that Obama was not qualified.
The noose tightens
Anybody got a link to raw footage from the courtroom?
Nice synopsis - thanks.
want to stay informed ...