Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

More hot air out of the wackjobs. Luddites couldn't ask for better allies, eh . . . ?
1 posted on 01/28/2012 11:23:44 AM PST by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Olog-hai

In my view, turning soybeans into diesel is as dumb as turning corn into ethanol.


3 posted on 01/28/2012 12:30:50 PM PST by nascarnation (DEFEAT BARAQ 2012 DEPORT BARAQ 2013)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Olog-hai

They do have a solution. “A Bipartisan Group of US Senators Calls on EPA to Refrain From Including Indirect Land Use Change in Biofuel Regulations”
17 March 2009 A bipartisan group of 12 US senators led by Tom Harkin (D-IA) and Chuck Grassley (R-IA) has called on the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) not to include calculations of indirect land use change (ILUC) effects as contributors to life-cycle greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions for biofuels in the upcoming rulemaking for implementation of the updated Renewable Fuels Standard (RFS-2) enacted in the Energy Independence and Security Act (EISA) of 2007.

The Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS-2) defined within the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 requires biofuels to meet specified life-cycle greenhouse gas emission reduction targets to qualify. The law specifies that life-cycle GHG emissions are to include “direct emissions and significant indirect emissions such as significant emissions from land use changes, as determined by the Administrator.”

Depending upon the assumptions and boundary conditions set in the ILUC evaluation, the result can dramatically increase the calculated GHG footprint of a biofuel, far offsetting the presumed greenhouse gas benefits of its use.
http://www.greencarcongress.com/2009/03/bipartisan-group-of-us-senators-calls-on-epa-to-refrain-from-including-indirect-land-use-change-in-b.html


4 posted on 01/28/2012 12:36:48 PM PST by anglian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Olog-hai

This report does not even take into account the destruction of forests to ‘grow fuel’ like palm oil

Palm oil: the biofuel of the future driving an ecological disaster now
http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2007/apr/04/energy.indonesia

Pregnant orangutan mother and child rescued at last minute from knife-bearing bounty hunters in Borneo
http://www.nydailynews.com/news/pregnant-orangutan-mother-child-rescued-minute-knife-bearing-bounty-hunters-borneo-article-1.1013270?localLinksEnabled=false


7 posted on 01/28/2012 1:30:55 PM PST by Lorianne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]



OBAMA THE BIOFOOL



Obama replaces $4/gallon petroleum fuel:


US NAVY $44/gallon BIOFOOL
US AIR FORCE $59/gallon BIOFOOL




9 posted on 07/16/2012 8:19:45 AM PDT by devolve (-------------- ------- no servers - no intelligence ----------- ---------------------)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson