Skip to comments.VIDEO: Georgia Judge Malihi Under Siege
Posted on 02/03/2012 8:27:03 PM PST by OUTKAST
Georgia Judge Malihi decides to keep Barack Hussein (The Long Legged Mack Daddy) on the Georgia Ballot. Recorded on 3 February 2012.
Were there threats or just liberalism prevailing again in conservative states?
I think the judge had a little talk with himself and decided that if the Supremes won’t remove Obama from office why should he buck the system.
How can zer0 be natural born when his father was married to other women and not a US citizen?
He SHOULD be asking himself why he should remain on the bench.
How can the country survive when it lacks courageous judges and congressmen?
I don’t think any judge is going to do anything in this case, right now.
So this is probably a crazy idea...but why not pursue these allegations when he gets out of office and isn’t so protected.
He could still do some prison time?
if anything. get it out of the way so no one else pulls the same stunt again.
If this judge is concerned about retaliation from making an honorable ruling, maybe he should spend some time at Arlington Cemetery while he rethinks his decision.
I am a realist.
Obviously, our entire political system, the courts, the conservative and Marxist media, law enforcement, and our highest military are utterly corrupt. An oath means nothing to them. Millions of our citizens are willing to vote for a Marxist with a completely unknown history.
So...The thing to do is prepare for when the SHTF, because it is inevitably coming. The only glue that has held our nation's experiment in self-rule together is the basic morality, honesty, and good will of the citizenry. That glue is no longer there.
According to a handful (so far) of Freepers that’s a fantasy made up by “birthers”. None of the founding fathers ever discussed the NBC terminology they wrote into the Constitution. So apparently it’s just there arbitrarily and doesn’t mean anything special.
A free nation is a terrible thing to waste.
A free nation is a terrible thing to lose.
oh please. then please explain why ‘citizen’ was changed to ‘natural born citizen’.
obviously, they had an intention... which they discussed at length before and after the Constitution was created.
only those trying to help the left say it means nothing
i’m trying to understand how a judge would rule in favor of eligibility without being presented ANY evidence to support it
last i checked, you are not assumed eligible to start with... you must provide the proof
so the question remains, exactly how is 0bama eligible? to date, the question has been glossed over and ignored.
That was my point. I’m on your side. I’ve read several posts right here on FR that all the NBC stuff was created out of whole cloth by birthers. IOW, there’s no difference between citizen and nbc. I should have put a sarcasm tag at the end of my post.
I think that was sarcasm.
In my opinion.
THE post of the day.
Obviously, what only matters now is that the person running for president has to have been born.
obama is not a test tube baby so he must be a NBC. Science has screwed up the way today’s youth understands terminology. We, old timers must adapt.
I wouldn’t be surprised if in the near future someone will be running for president not knowing the English language.
Your comment abigail is, of course, complete nonsense. Founder, Framer and arguably our greatist chief justice, John Marshall, was on the Virginia Ratification congress, attended our first law school, at William and Mary in 1781, where Thomas Jefferson chartered the Law School and assigned as its first required text, Vattel’s Law of Nations. Justice Marshall cited Law of Nations in The Venus, 12 US 253 at paragraph 289, and praised Vattel as the most concise source for the common law definition with which they were all familiar - “A natural born citizen is born on the soil to parents who are its citizens.”
It was also discussed at length by our first congressional historian, who was also an interim president of the Congress United before the ratification of the Constitution. That was Dr. David Ramsay, a founder who fought as a field surgeon in South Carolina, historian, president, and prolific author.
There are many others, but the point has been made. You don't honor the usual Obots, many of whom are quite well informed, and who have helped us by asking reasonably informed questions.
As for natural born citizenship not having been defined in The Constitution, try to find any term defined in the Constitution. There actually is one, but the intention was to create a concise definition of the ideas essential to our remaining a republic of laws guaranteeing individual freedom. Madison explained that since the meanings of words change, the only way to create a timeless document was to specify that it was to be understood, as Chief Justice Waite went to pains to explain in Minor v. Happersett, which made the Vattel/Marshall definition stare decisis - precedent - is to insist that its interpretation be based upon the common usage, common language, common law, familiar to the framers.
I know all of that. My comment was sarcasm. I forgot to tag it as such.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.