Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

VIDEO: Georgia Judge Malihi Under Siege
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CQsmbgOVO4o&list=UUR6prZ4gShuBbA60Cns0nVw&index=1&feature=plcp ^

Posted on 02/03/2012 8:27:03 PM PST by OUTKAST

Georgia Judge Malihi decides to keep Barack Hussein (The Long Legged Mack Daddy) on the Georgia Ballot. Recorded on 3 February 2012.


TOPICS: Chit/Chat; Conspiracy
KEYWORDS: georgia; malihi; manning; naturalborncitizen; obama; sourcetitlenoturl

1 posted on 02/03/2012 8:27:21 PM PST by OUTKAST
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: OUTKAST

Were there threats or just liberalism prevailing again in conservative states?


2 posted on 02/03/2012 8:35:40 PM PST by Theodore R. (I have a feeling that our little Republican primary voters will again disappoint us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OUTKAST

I think the judge had a little talk with himself and decided that if the Supremes won’t remove Obama from office why should he buck the system.


3 posted on 02/03/2012 8:39:48 PM PST by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OUTKAST

How can zer0 be natural born when his father was married to other women and not a US citizen?


4 posted on 02/03/2012 8:44:36 PM PST by MtnClimber (Tim Tebow will never be successful in the NFL - Leftist journalists who have sold their souls)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Georgia Girl 2

He SHOULD be asking himself why he should remain on the bench.


5 posted on 02/03/2012 8:48:59 PM PST by Mortrey (Impeach President Soros)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Georgia Girl 2

How can the country survive when it lacks courageous judges and congressmen?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H3aCfR8rmrw


6 posted on 02/03/2012 8:49:39 PM PST by 353FMG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: OUTKAST

I don’t think any judge is going to do anything in this case, right now.

So this is probably a crazy idea...but why not pursue these allegations when he gets out of office and isn’t so protected.

He could still do some prison time?


7 posted on 02/03/2012 8:52:44 PM PST by berdie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: berdie

if anything. get it out of the way so no one else pulls the same stunt again.


8 posted on 02/03/2012 9:06:39 PM PST by cableguymn (Good thing I am a conservative. Otherwise I would have to support Mittens like Republicans do.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: OUTKAST

If this judge is concerned about retaliation from making an honorable ruling, maybe he should spend some time at Arlington Cemetery while he rethinks his decision.


9 posted on 02/03/2012 9:22:03 PM PST by Tagurit (Are your pigs fed, watered and ready to fly?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OUTKAST
“The lights are growing dim.” ( Manning)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

I am a realist.

Obviously, our entire political system, the courts, the conservative and Marxist media, law enforcement, and our highest military are utterly corrupt. An oath means nothing to them. Millions of our citizens are willing to vote for a Marxist with a completely unknown history.

So...The thing to do is prepare for when the SHTF, because it is inevitably coming. The only glue that has held our nation's experiment in self-rule together is the basic morality, honesty, and good will of the citizenry. That glue is no longer there.

10 posted on 02/03/2012 9:23:37 PM PST by wintertime (I am a Constitutional Restorationist!!! Yes!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

According to a handful (so far) of Freepers that’s a fantasy made up by “birthers”. None of the founding fathers ever discussed the NBC terminology they wrote into the Constitution. So apparently it’s just there arbitrarily and doesn’t mean anything special.


11 posted on 02/03/2012 9:37:05 PM PST by abigailsmybaby ("To understan' the livin', you got ta commune wit' da dead." Minerva)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: OUTKAST

A free nation is a terrible thing to waste.

A free nation is a terrible thing to lose.


12 posted on 02/03/2012 9:59:18 PM PST by Know et al (The greatest argument against democracy is a five minute conversation with a voter: Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: abigailsmybaby

LOL

oh please. then please explain why ‘citizen’ was changed to ‘natural born citizen’.

obviously, they had an intention... which they discussed at length before and after the Constitution was created.

only those trying to help the left say it means nothing


13 posted on 02/03/2012 10:49:13 PM PST by sten (fighting tyranny never goes out of style)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: OUTKAST

i’m trying to understand how a judge would rule in favor of eligibility without being presented ANY evidence to support it

last i checked, you are not assumed eligible to start with... you must provide the proof

so the question remains, exactly how is 0bama eligible? to date, the question has been glossed over and ignored.


14 posted on 02/03/2012 10:52:15 PM PST by sten (fighting tyranny never goes out of style)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sten

That was my point. I’m on your side. I’ve read several posts right here on FR that all the NBC stuff was created out of whole cloth by birthers. IOW, there’s no difference between citizen and nbc. I should have put a sarcasm tag at the end of my post.


15 posted on 02/03/2012 11:09:56 PM PST by abigailsmybaby ("To understan' the livin', you got ta commune wit' da dead." Minerva)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: sten

I think that was sarcasm.


16 posted on 02/03/2012 11:19:39 PM PST by PghBaldy (Person at RP's “Campaign for Liberty”, sold "Protocols of Elders of Zion" for 3 years on C4L site)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Tagurit

In my opinion.

THE post of the day.

Semper Fi.


17 posted on 02/03/2012 11:48:06 PM PST by Shadowstrike (Be polite, Be professional, but have a plan to kill everyone you meet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: abigailsmybaby

Obviously, what only matters now is that the person running for president has to have been born.

obama is not a test tube baby so he must be a NBC. Science has screwed up the way today’s youth understands terminology. We, old timers must adapt.

I wouldn’t be surprised if in the near future someone will be running for president not knowing the English language.


18 posted on 02/04/2012 12:11:20 AM PST by 1_Rain_Drop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: abigailsmybaby
"None of the founding fathers ever discussed the NBC terminology they wrote into the Constitution. So apparently it’s just there arbitrarily and doesn’t mean anything special."

Your comment abigail is, of course, complete nonsense. Founder, Framer and arguably our greatist chief justice, John Marshall, was on the Virginia Ratification congress, attended our first law school, at William and Mary in 1781, where Thomas Jefferson chartered the Law School and assigned as its first required text, Vattel’s Law of Nations. Justice Marshall cited Law of Nations in The Venus, 12 US 253 at paragraph 289, and praised Vattel as the most concise source for the common law definition with which they were all familiar - “A natural born citizen is born on the soil to parents who are its citizens.”

It was also discussed at length by our first congressional historian, who was also an interim president of the Congress United before the ratification of the Constitution. That was Dr. David Ramsay, a founder who fought as a field surgeon in South Carolina, historian, president, and prolific author.

There are many others, but the point has been made. You don't honor the usual Obots, many of whom are quite well informed, and who have helped us by asking reasonably informed questions.

As for natural born citizenship not having been defined in The Constitution, try to find any term defined in the Constitution. There actually is one, but the intention was to create a concise definition of the ideas essential to our remaining a republic of laws guaranteeing individual freedom. Madison explained that since the meanings of words change, the only way to create a timeless document was to specify that it was to be understood, as Chief Justice Waite went to pains to explain in Minor v. Happersett, which made the Vattel/Marshall definition stare decisis - precedent - is to insist that its interpretation be based upon the common usage, common language, common law, familiar to the framers.

19 posted on 02/04/2012 12:34:09 AM PST by Spaulding
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Spaulding

I know all of that. My comment was sarcasm. I forgot to tag it as such.


20 posted on 02/04/2012 12:48:28 AM PST by abigailsmybaby ("To understan' the livin', you got ta commune wit' da dead." Minerva)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: PghBaldy

lol Thank you!


21 posted on 02/04/2012 12:50:57 AM PST by abigailsmybaby ("To understan' the livin', you got ta commune wit' da dead." Minerva)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: 1_Rain_Drop

We’re getting there. Pretty quickly too.


22 posted on 02/04/2012 12:53:23 AM PST by abigailsmybaby ("To understan' the livin', you got ta commune wit' da dead." Minerva)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: OUTKAST
Face it, finding a judge willing to unleash the chaos which would occur if Obama is kept off of a ballot or impeached is going to be impossible. SHTF time would begin about 30 seconds after the news hit the streets.

I'm even concerned about the aftermath of Obama's losing reelection fair and square, and you can bet your bippy that "republican leaders" are concerned as well.

Would "republican leaders" throw the race to Obama to avoid a civil eruption? I don't know, but they certainly haven't demonstrated much courage so far, go along to get along may win the race.

23 posted on 02/04/2012 12:57:25 AM PST by SWAMPSNIPER (The Second Amendment, a Matter of Fact, Not a Matter of Opinion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: abigailsmybaby; PghBaldy; Spaulding

“lol Thank you!”

FWIW, I caught the sarcasm, too. The “So apparently it’s just there arbitrarily and doesn’t mean anything special.” was a dead giveaway. :)


24 posted on 02/04/2012 2:26:17 AM PST by Flotsam_Jetsome (If not you, who? If not now, when?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: berdie

‘why not pursue these allegations when he gets out of office and isn’t so protected.’
Problem is -
he is so in control of the justice system, and the money, and the voting-fraud machine, and the obama-love media machine that there is no way to vote him out!
Another 4 years and we are finsished!

If only the pres cnadidates gang up on him and expose his ineligibility while they are on the center stage! At least bring to the public’s attention that he shows utter contempt for the courts/law! But that is not going to happen!?
You think Gingrich will be brave enough to draw people’s attention to this -
perhpas on his next debate, for his closing remarks, sneak in this - ‘obama shows utter contempt for our court/laws when he did not show up as ordered for the Jan 26 Ga hearing for the ballot access challenge case. No president has ever shown such blatant contempt for the justice system!
Do you want such a lawless president?’


25 posted on 02/04/2012 5:02:50 AM PST by chrisnj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber
How can zer0 be natural born when his father was married to other women and not a US citizen?

Because made-up birther nonsense isn't the law of the land.

26 posted on 02/04/2012 6:23:18 AM PST by Drew68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Drew68

Then you should be outraged that a sitting president ordered the assassination of an American citizen in Anwar al-Awlaki, who under your logic would be eligible to be POTUS.

There is nonsense and then there is stupidity, as in obot troll logic.


27 posted on 02/04/2012 6:33:55 AM PST by Hotlanta Mike (TeaNami)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Hotlanta Mike
Then you should be outraged that a sitting president ordered the assassination of an American citizen in Anwar al-Awlaki, who under your logic would be eligible to be POTUS.

Being a despicable scumbag doesn't negate presidential eligibility. The key is not voting them into office. Even before being blown to pieces by a Hellfire missile, the road to the White House was looking pretty dim for Anwar al-Awlaki.

28 posted on 02/04/2012 6:44:24 AM PST by Drew68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: abigailsmybaby

“So apparently it’s just there arbitrarily and doesn’t mean anything special.”

When the Constitution was written, we did not have Americans posted outside the U.S. (in every stinkin’ country around the world); therefore, this means they were not procreating out side of the U.S.


29 posted on 02/04/2012 6:57:28 AM PST by Gatn(CraigIsaMangoTreeLawyer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Drew68

The key is to not to vote them into office? Didn’t work out too well in 2008...You seem to forget that Obama associated himself with domestic terrorists as well.


30 posted on 02/04/2012 7:03:29 AM PST by Hotlanta Mike (TeaNami)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: abigailsmybaby

P.S.

But our forefathers looked at the present as well as far into the future and didn’t want anyone, ever, with divided allegiances to be president. And for good reason. Look at the mess we have right now.

By the way, you need to read this:

http://www.newswithviews.com/Devvy/kidd520.htm

WILL THERE BE A CITIZENSHIP ELIGIBILITY CHALLENGE FOR ROMNEY?

By: Devvy
January 7, 2012
NewsWithViews.com


31 posted on 02/04/2012 7:12:53 AM PST by Gatn(CraigIsaMangoTreeLawyer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: sten; abigailsmybaby

“then please explain why ‘citizen’ was changed to ‘natural born citizen’.”

Probably because “natural born subject” was the phrase used in most all the citizenship laws in colonial America.

As an example used in the wording by Massachusetts:

“In March, 1787, the Massachusetts legislature passed “AN ACT FOR NATURALIZING WILLIAM MARTIN AND OTHERS.” in which it was declared that William Martin and Others,”shall be deemed, adjudged and taken to be free Citizens of this Commonwealth, and entitled to all the liberties, privileges and immunities of natural born subjects.”

In March, 1787, the Massachusetts legislature passed “AN ACT FOR NATURALIZING EDWARD WYER AND OTHERS THEREIN NAMED.” in which it was declared that William Martin and Others,”shall be deemed, adjudged and taken, to be free Citizens of this Commonwealth, and entitled to all the liberties, privileges and immunities of natural born subjects.”

In October, 1787, the Massachusetts legislature passed “AN ACT FOR NATURALIZING BARTHOLOMY DE GREGOIRE, AND MARIA THERESA, HIS WIFE, AND THEIR CHILDREN.” in which it was declared that Bartholomy de Gregoire, and Maria Theresa, his wife, their children,”shall be deemed, adjudged and taken to be free Citizens of this Commonwealth, and entitled to all the liberties, rights and privileges of natural born citizens.

In March, 1790, the Massachusetts legislature passed “AN ACT FOR NATURALIZING JOHN JARVIS, AND OTHERS, THEREIN NAMED” in which it was declared that John Jarvis and others, “shall be deemed adjudged and taken to be free citizens of this Commonwealth, and entitled to all the liberties, privileges and immunities of natural born subjects.””

Notice they used natural born subject and natural born citizen interchangeably - even AFTER the Constitution.

Writing in Conn in 1795, Zephaniah Swift (A system of the laws of the state of Connecticut) wrote:

“It is an established maxim, received by all political writers, that every person owes a natural allegiance to the government of that country in which he is born. Allegiance is defined to be a tie, that binds the subject to the state, and in consequence of his obedience, he is entitled to protection… The children of aliens, born in this state, are considered as natural born subjects, and have the same rights with the rest of the citizens.”

A huge problem for the birther argument is that the states and writers of the time often used NBC & NBS interchangeably.

““And if, at common law, all human beings born within the ligeance of the King, and under the King’s obedience, were natural-born subjects, and not aliens, I do not perceive why this doctrine does not apply to these United States, in all cases in which there is no express constitutional or statute declaration to the contrary. . . . Subject and citizen are, in a degree, convertible terms as applied to natives, and though the term citizen seems to be appropriate to republican freemen, yet we are, equally with the inhabitants of all other countries, subjects, for we are equally bound by allegiance and subjection to the government and law of the land.”

James Kent COMMENTARIES ON AMERICAN LAW (1826)


32 posted on 02/04/2012 7:15:44 AM PST by Mr Rogers ("they found themselves made strangers in their own country")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: OUTKAST; All

All That Is Wrong with Georgia State Judge Michael M. Malihi’s Decision that Putative President Obama Is a “Natural Born Citizen”

http://puzo1.blogspot.com/2012/02/all-that-is-wrong-with-georgia-state.html


33 posted on 02/04/2012 7:28:40 AM PST by Hotlanta Mike (TeaNami)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: abigailsmybaby
I know all of that. My comment was sarcasm. I forgot to tag it as such.

Aha. Sorry. There so many, apparently including Malihi, whose understanding about corresponds to your sarcasm.

There are an amazing number of people who haven't had, or made the time, or known where to look, to correct the misinformation being spread by so many for whom the Constitution now means whatever is acceptable to the media. Malihi has just contracted the signed understanding of a federal judge, Michael Chertoff, and every US Senator, who signed Senate Res 511 confirming their understanding that a natural born citizen is born to two citizen parents. That they were providing cover for McCain is not relevant here, but it seems that these days judges just say whatever is convenient or correct for their allegiance of the moment.

34 posted on 02/04/2012 4:20:05 PM PST by Spaulding
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Drew68

Then please educate me on the difference beteewn a citizen and a natural born citizen, comrade.


35 posted on 02/04/2012 7:39:48 PM PST by MtnClimber (Tim Tebow will never be successful in the NFL - Leftist journalists who have sold their souls)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Gatún(CraigIsaMangoTreeLawyer)

Thank you. I hadn’t seen that article yet and didn’t know there were challenges filed against Romney and Obama in Texas...and by a Democrat.


36 posted on 02/05/2012 2:04:33 PM PST by abigailsmybaby ("To understan' the livin', you got ta commune wit' da dead." Minerva)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: abigailsmybaby

You are most welcome.

Thank YOU!!!


37 posted on 02/05/2012 2:20:09 PM PST by Gatn(CraigIsaMangoTreeLawyer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Flotsam_Jetsome

38 posted on 02/06/2012 4:55:11 PM PST by abigailsmybaby ("To understan' the livin', you got ta commune wit' da dead." Minerva)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson