Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Saral Palin says Newt is the toughest fighter of the candidates
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9dPrCQJndL0 ^

Posted on 02/18/2012 8:57:52 PM PST by Christie at the beach

See video - interview Palin: Third-Party Candidate Would Hurt GOP Comments about Mitch daniels


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: business; elections; fightlikeagirl; gingrich; gopprimaries; government; obama; palin; politics; president2012; sarahpalin
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-100101-150151-200201-250 next last
To: Christie at the beach; admin

Is there any reason a two-week old video, let alone a two-week old video not marked as such, is in breaking news?


151 posted on 02/19/2012 5:53:17 AM PST by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CainConservative

Santorum has less baggage to turn off voters, but Newt has a solid record of being able to push a solid conservative program to completion, in the face of Democrat opposition.


152 posted on 02/19/2012 5:54:12 AM PST by PapaBear3625 (In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act. - George Orwell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: onyx; All

And when onyx loses her patience, you KNOW the other poster is completely wrong.


153 posted on 02/19/2012 5:54:58 AM PST by Servant of the Cross (the Truth will set you free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: CainConservative

You can’t go after Obama with a third party and you can’t take on Romney and the GOP-E by splitting the conservative vote. We all know this and we all must come to a logical conclusion based on all the background of history.

Sarah is stirring the pot and if anyone tries this guessing game as to what she is up to, you will most assuredly repeat the same head scratching scenes as the GOP-E did in Alaska when she knocked off the machine.

Everything she says has a tactical meaning and she consistently displays the traits of an ardent student of Sun Tzu.

I see by your handle that we agreed mightily when she made the announcement not to run. At first I was not sure who created the phoney bimbo eruption and took our ace out of the deck, but what has happened since leads me to only one conclusion, Romney PAC. I also think she has come to the same conclusion because of the way the same group of folks took aim at her the last few years to pave the way for their champion. But something funny happened on the way to the coronation, a Momma Grizzly roared.

With her also beginning to lay out the hits against Daniels in the talk about a brokered convention, the Sun Tzu “very unconventional” campaign looms.


154 posted on 02/19/2012 6:02:58 AM PST by mazda77 (and I am a Native Texan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: true believer forever; onyx
She needs to settle the issue. I don’t really like the way she is playing her supporters...

We are limited by our lot in life to this and possibly other forums to make a change in what we are living under. The passion is great and frustrations of the current malaise doesn't help things.

With that said, she too is using her lot in life to make a difference to fashion the argument for what most honest people here would agree upon. The reason she became so popular is that she was one of those rare individuals who had "it" when connecting to the people.

So if you take our God given rights seriously, why in the world would you want her to stay out of anything. Just because her megaphone is bigger than yours, it is no reason to display a certain amount of that envy that is the butt of so many jokes.

155 posted on 02/19/2012 6:20:59 AM PST by mazda77 (and I am a Native Texan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: ansel12; onyx

You want to see serious old fashioned vicious thread trolls? This is nothing. Just visit any thread about Santorum. THERE you’ll see numerous serious old fashioned vicious thread trolls. What is seen so far on this thread is refreshing in comparison.


156 posted on 02/19/2012 6:21:29 AM PST by Brian Kopp DPM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Christie at the beach

Would this be considered a non-endorsement endorsement?


157 posted on 02/19/2012 6:26:04 AM PST by LUV W (Never surrender...don't give up. We WILL take our country back, one vote at a time!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: newheart

He really needs to go on a Diet.


158 posted on 02/19/2012 6:32:26 AM PST by Old Retired Army Guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Christie at the beach

I think Palin is aiming for a Brokered Convention that will nominate her.


159 posted on 02/19/2012 6:32:32 AM PST by Old Retired Army Guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Christie at the beach

Fighting a tar baby won’t get you points; it gets you dirty.


160 posted on 02/19/2012 6:57:21 AM PST by Carry_Okie (There has not been a conservative American government for 90 years.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reagan69; All
Newt said yesterday at a campaign stop, “Liberals love the Volt because you can’t put a gun rack on it!!”

Bwahahahahha! This is great! Gotta love Newt's quick mind!

161 posted on 02/19/2012 6:57:53 AM PST by CAluvdubya (Newt or Rick.....either one works)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 141 | View Replies]

To: mazda77

what? I was voicing an opinion a lot of others are feeling... no envy, no jealousy, just a gut understanding that politics as usual, and sitting on the bench, isn’t going to save America... People need to stop sitting on the fence... in case you hadn’t noticed, none of barack’s supporters, powerful or not, are on the fence...

Nice try at snark... but you need to sharpen up a little... kind of a clunky thud..


162 posted on 02/19/2012 7:00:46 AM PST by true believer forever (Save the Irish Setters - Vote Newt!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies]

To: true believer forever
Nice try at snark... but you need to sharpen up a little...

Let's see, you responded, point was on target.

163 posted on 02/19/2012 7:04:56 AM PST by mazda77 (and I am a Native Texan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 162 | View Replies]

To: Christie at the beach
If it was head to head with Santourm v Newt and electability wasn't an issue, I think I would go with Newt as I think he would be a better president.

OTOH, I think Romney was successful in destroying Newt.

We shall see if Newt makes his comeback.

164 posted on 02/19/2012 7:07:40 AM PST by Tribune7 (GAS WAS $1.85 per gallon on the day Obama was Inaugurated! - - freeper Gaffer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mazda77

Actually, I try to respond to anyone who posts to me - whether they deserve an answer or not... posting etiquette is my middle name...


165 posted on 02/19/2012 7:14:33 AM PST by true believer forever (Save the Irish Setters - Vote Newt!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 163 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; bigheadfred; Bockscar; ColdOne; Convert from ECUSA; ...

Thanks Christie at the beach.


166 posted on 02/19/2012 7:17:31 AM PST by SunkenCiv (Are You From Jersey?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Christie at the beach

Imho NG or RS for POTUS is a okay. OR, SP via a BC. w/a West for vp.


167 posted on 02/19/2012 7:31:01 AM PST by Leep (Dueling tag lines=don't worry,you'll be a vegetable guy soon<>It's gonna be a Newt day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lazlo in PA

“Rick is wining. No issues here.”

Hmmmmm....

So, he’s drinking a lot?

Or did you mean to say “whining.”? That I can believe.

Or “winning”? LOL!

Or was your post just a head fake?

Thanks for playing.


168 posted on 02/19/2012 7:49:18 AM PST by moonhawk (Rush, Mark, Sean: Conservative talkers. Sarah, Newt: Conservative DOers. Mitt: Conservative faker)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

To: o2bfree

Uhhhh... No!

Check your facts a little better next time.


169 posted on 02/19/2012 8:06:51 AM PST by moonhawk (Rush, Mark, Sean: Conservative talkers. Sarah, Newt: Conservative DOers. Mitt: Conservative faker)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies]

To: mazda77
With her also beginning to lay out the hits against Daniels in the talk about a brokered convention, the Sun Tzu “very unconventional” campaign looms.

Yes it does, and on a national level a guy who wraps his remaining hair around his head like Cheese Wiz, ain't gonna make it, ditto that him selling the highway system...

170 posted on 02/19/2012 8:40:35 AM PST by taildragger (( Palin / Mulally 2012 ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies]

To: mazda77
With her also beginning to lay out the hits against Daniels in the talk about a brokered convention, the Sun Tzu “very unconventional” campaign looms.

Yes it does, and on a national level a guy who wraps his remaining hair around his head like Cheese Wiz, ain't gonna make it, ditto that him selling the highway system...

171 posted on 02/19/2012 8:40:59 AM PST by taildragger (( Palin / Mulally 2012 ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies]

To: jessduntno
"Gingrich/West"

Some time ago I posted that the only way Newt could get elected was to have Sarah Palin as his VP.

172 posted on 02/19/2012 8:44:30 AM PST by OldEagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: OldEagle

So...how about Palin-Gingrich??


173 posted on 02/19/2012 8:50:31 AM PST by OldEagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 172 | View Replies]

To: monkapotamus

LOVE that video. That idiot had NO comeback! I can’t watch it often enough!!

Thanks for reposting.


174 posted on 02/19/2012 8:53:05 AM PST by NoGrayZone (Jim "Firebrand" Robinson endorses Newt...with EPIC call to action!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: Lazlo in PA
While I will vote for Newt in the Georgia primary here, I am not deluded enough to believe that he is the 'toughest' fighter of the candidates. He has an excellent academic command of historical political rhetoric, he has a very good ability to think quickly in some venues, and he occasionally can excel in one-on-one debates that don't hamper him - but he is not in control of any venue; and he won't be so fortunate to have a "Lincoln-Douglas" style debate any time during this year.

What disappoints me most is his whining about other candidates ganging up on him or not 'playing fair' and putting out untrue campaign ads. I'd like to speak to him personally and tell him to 'nut up' and take it like a man and fight with ideas. Letters from his lawyers to media outlets don't do it for me, frankly.

175 posted on 02/19/2012 8:54:28 AM PST by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Gene Eric; moonhawk
"Newt should think about reaching out to a wider audience, and toss out a few platitudes here and there."

Throw out a few platitudes? What the heck do you think got us here in this hellhole?

Platitudes are LIES AND DECEPTION. If you can't win on merit, you shouldn't win.

"A platitude is a trite, meaningless, biased, or prosaic statement, often presented as if it were significant and original."

NO THANKS!

176 posted on 02/19/2012 8:58:13 AM PST by NoGrayZone (Jim "Firebrand" Robinson endorses Newt...with EPIC call to action!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Brian Kopp

So, getting the truth out about Santorum is “vicious”?

Well then, call me “Viscious”. I could care less.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=o2ZjHJqqu9E


177 posted on 02/19/2012 9:04:57 AM PST by PSYCHO-FREEP (If you come to a fork in the road, take it........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 156 | View Replies]

To: Gaffer

You know, I think the image of Newt whining is greatly exaggerated. If you ask me, I found Santorum to be the whiner. Always complaining about not getting questions in the debates, never getting interviews, he is the Dangerfield of the campaigns. Now he is getting the opportunity and what does he do? His comments have to be interpreted and explained, he has to back pedal and explain “what he was trying to say”. I could sure overlook a few little moments when newt was complaining to get the vast array of his positives and talents.


178 posted on 02/19/2012 9:06:40 AM PST by Toespi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 175 | View Replies]

To: Servant of the Cross; onyx; All
"And when onyx loses her patience, you KNOW the other poster is completely wrong."

Amen to that. This is the 1st time I've seen her lose her patience.

You go girl!

179 posted on 02/19/2012 9:07:44 AM PST by NoGrayZone (Jim "Firebrand" Robinson endorses Newt...with EPIC call to action!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies]

To: CAluvdubya

“Newt said yesterday at a campaign stop, “Liberals love the Volt because you can’t put a gun rack on it!!”

This is so REAGAN! And this is the kind of stuff that will beat the hell out of Obama.


180 posted on 02/19/2012 9:11:05 AM PST by Toespi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 161 | View Replies]

To: Toespi

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2848449/posts

Here is the “live thread” to Newts speech. I was trying to get in as much as I could.

He had some winners, but I am NOT as quick as he is!


181 posted on 02/19/2012 9:17:56 AM PST by NoGrayZone (Jim "Firebrand" Robinson endorses Newt...with EPIC call to action!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 180 | View Replies]

To: Toespi

Well, maybe....but he was my Congressman for many years. And, the image I see, the words I hear, and the direction I see him going now don’t lend a whole lot of confidence in his success.

He has those positives - quick thinking, excellent logic and command of language - on occasion. He also has more than just one or two super eff-ups in my opinion which he does a very poor job of explaining his rationale (e.g., Sittting with Nancy on the couch, or his forays at addressing the immigration problem).

Right now, all I see/hear on media is what can be construed as whining or complaining about ‘attack ads’. As far as his recent Georgia forays with the public and his guns and ‘bear arms’ joke, I question whether he’s even held a gun, frankly.


182 posted on 02/19/2012 9:23:39 AM PST by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 178 | View Replies]

To: CainConservative; onyx
You regard Onyx as "pretty mean"????? Wow. You have extraordinarily poor judgment.

Your tagline says you think Santorum and Huckabee would be an ideal ticket, which indicates you're perfectly comfortable with "conservative" being defined big government used to enforce "Christian" morality. Smoking is frowned upon by many Christians, and if you recall, Huckabee said he would have been fine with a national ban on smoking. That, my FRiend, is the antithesis of limited government and liberty.

Christian morality and values, along with Christian charities, will THRIVE BEST in a limited government environment. Social conservatives must get off their high, self-righteous horses and humble themselves to the idea that other than their own individual charity and behavior, they have zero place overseeing, let alone using GOVERNMENT to oversee, "proper" Christian behavior.

If government was limited, we'd have no Roe v. Wade and abortion would probably be illegal in most, if not all states. If government was limited, Christian charities would be taking care of the poor and teaching them a work ethic, instead of government dole creating entitlement-arrogant slaves. If government was limited, free people would be able to peacefully, civilly discriminate against OPEN homosexuality in their workplaces, businesses, lives, communities, schools, military, and anywhere else they wanted to reject it.

Being against abortion and open homosexuality doesn't make you a conservative -- it makes you against abortion and the gay agenda. Being against those two things AND RECOGNIZING that limited govenrment the way our Founders intended is the best way to ensure a moral society, is being a conservative.

These true conservatives RESPECT the rights of others to make mistakes and do wrong to learn the path of righteousness. We each have our own path to God, and busy-bodies often serve as obstacles in that path. Busy-bodies as private entities are one thing; busy-bodies elected to political power, no matter WHICH political party they belong to, are LETHAL TO FREEDOM. Please wake up to this truth.

Social conservatives are every bit as emotion-driven as liberals, and the results are just as damaging.

183 posted on 02/19/2012 9:36:24 AM PST by Finny ("Raise hell. Vote smart." -- Ted Nugent)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: 4rcane

“newt is a tough fighter. The problem is, what is he fighting for? More status quo? Newt is against even modest cuts proposed by Paul Ryan”

His “attack” on Rep. Paul Ryan’s plan was not an attack on Rep. Ryan or his plan. He answered a question later in the interview after he had discussed Rep. Ryan’s plan that was inturppted by the host and then by Newt’s detractors as an attack on rep. Paul and his plan. This was contrived and distorted.

http://www.americanthinker.com/2012/02/does_ryan_now_agree_with_gingrich.html#ixzz1mkl45Vtl


184 posted on 02/19/2012 9:51:43 AM PST by duffee (NEWT 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Brian Kopp

I haven’t seen any where near the vitriol and visciousness spewed at Rick that I’ve seen thrown at Newt. I do believe that Paul and Romney are both slimey and unprincipled and should be fair game on a personal level as well as their records.


185 posted on 02/19/2012 10:03:47 AM PST by duffee (NEWT 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 156 | View Replies]

To: Finny

Social Conservatives dominate the Republican party, my friend.

That’s WHY Willard the Lib is toast. Period.


186 posted on 02/19/2012 10:04:26 AM PST by CainConservative (Santorum/Huck 2012 w/ Newt, Cain, Palin, Bach, Parker, Watts, Duncan, & Petraeus in the Cabinet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 183 | View Replies]

To: duffee; All

But why slam either of our final two conservatives?

Not that you have. But Onyx calling Santorum names such as “backstabber” is out of line.

Santorum is about to take Willard DOWN in Michigan for us conservatives and freedom lovers...and a deadly blow at that for the Masachusetts Lib.

Let Rick do our job.


187 posted on 02/19/2012 10:10:17 AM PST by CainConservative (Santorum/Huck 2012 w/ Newt, Cain, Palin, Bach, Parker, Watts, Duncan, & Petraeus in the Cabinet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 185 | View Replies]

To: CainConservative; onyx; DJ MacWoW; TheOldLady; All
But why slam either of our final two conservatives?

Not that you have. But Onyx calling Santorum names such as “backstabber” is out of line.

*********************************

Talking behind another FReeper's back is considered very bad form.

188 posted on 02/19/2012 10:17:32 AM PST by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 187 | View Replies]

To: Christie at the beach; b9; onyx; true believer forever; KansasGirl; TitansAFC; caww; All

Newt was one of Sarah’s steadfast supporters in 2008:

Newt Gingrich Defends Palin Over Obama during the presidential campaign in 2008

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RpYmv3cfzNw

September, 2008 - Newt Gingrich Defends Sarah Palin’s Interview Responses

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ijb9JajlZt8

Jan 18, 2012 on CNN - Newt Gingrich tells Wolf Blitzer he would ask Sarah Palin to take a “major role” in his administration if elected.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e5C6Pil9Os0


189 posted on 02/19/2012 10:26:59 AM PST by Marguerite (When I'm good, I am very, very good. But! When I'm bad, I'm even better)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: onyx

Sarah Palin: If I Were A South Carolinian, I Would Vote For Newt

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=endscreen&NR=1&v=wFx47DOd0xQ


190 posted on 02/19/2012 10:30:08 AM PST by Marguerite (When I'm good, I am very, very good. But! When I'm bad, I'm even better)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: newheart; Christie at the beach; Marguerite; b9

Little Ricky loves Arlen

191 posted on 02/19/2012 10:35:31 AM PST by katiedidit1 ("This is one race of people for whom psychoanalysis is of no use whatsoever." the Irish)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: onyx

One of the best Newt pics ever! he is brave, fearless in dealing with the leftwingers. Not ONE candidate running for president has done as much for America as Newt. His record as Speaker is historical.

Saving the photo:)


192 posted on 02/19/2012 10:41:59 AM PST by katiedidit1 ("This is one race of people for whom psychoanalysis is of no use whatsoever." the Irish)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: CainConservative

I don’t believe that pointing out that a candidate is not a fiscal Conservative and has a long record of supporting big government and Rinos is not a personal attack or a “SLAM” and should be part of this process, oh I forgot to mention earmarks. If Santorum gets the nomination I will support him, but I don’t believe we will see the differences made that needs to be made for our country to continue, if he is able to get elected.


193 posted on 02/19/2012 10:50:31 AM PST by duffee (NEWT 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 187 | View Replies]

To: Christie at the beach

“Rick has the non Romney vote, along with the Rush bump. He hasn’t even been vetted and you expect people to play the game to get out the vote for this man. You guys are acting like the establishment who we are trying to defeat”

EVERY TIME I’m posting something factually true about Santorum’s past deeds, Rickystanians are jumping at me with complaints that I just want to “smear” him.

If Santorum and his supporters cannot assume his OWN deeds, why would Obama?


194 posted on 02/19/2012 10:58:11 AM PST by Marguerite (When I'm good, I am very, very good. But! When I'm bad, I'm even better)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: LADY J; CainConservative; onyx; ansel12; antceecee; Christie at the beach; DJ MacWoW; TheOldLady; ..
"My guess is she thinks Santorum is a close second."

-------------------------------------------------------

Sounds like a pipe dream of yours. I heard her say NOTHING close to your conclusion!

Gingrich/West

=====================================================

Photobucket

Who will she pick? who will she pick? who will she ....

195 posted on 02/19/2012 11:01:16 AM PST by Col Freeper (FR is a smorgasbord of Conservative thoughts and ideas - dig in and enjoy it to its fullest!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: CainConservative

Your guess that Palin thinks Santorum is a close second may not be accurate. Rick made some nasty remarks about Sarah when it was thought she still might enter the race.

When asked about those comments, Sarah said, “ I don’t worry much about comments from knuckle dragging neaderthals.”

She has also made comments about Rick’s lack of fiscal conservatism.

Of those in the race now, Newt is Sarah’s guy.


196 posted on 02/19/2012 11:09:52 AM PST by conservativejoy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Christie at the beach
On her facebook page, people say to her, if you don't back Rick or Mitt, I will hate you. Newt supporters seem to be more respectful there while asking for her to help him ...

As a weathered FR veteran reader of Romney supporters' tone, for lack of better word, I figure it's to be expected from them. They must easily hold the record for being of the mindset that immediately reverts to "You hate ..." (and all appropriate variations thereof) such-and-such or whatever, Mormonism or Romney or Romney supporters. They could conceive no other possibility than "hate" as the driving force of the opposition.

I figure about half of Santorum supporters are closet-Romney supporters, which goes a long way to explaining any similar tone in Santorum backers' posts.

Do Romney's supporters "hate"? I don't know. I do know that desperation sounds a lot different, and will stoop a lot lower, than passion.

I'm a Newt supporter eyes wide open to his many flaws, but willing to roll the dice on him being the best bet of anybody in the race to beat Obama and then cut taxes and government drastically to start getting things moving toward liberty and prosperity. Moralizing is NOT what will set our nation right; CUTTING ITS GOVERNMENT WILL.

Godspeed Newt.

197 posted on 02/19/2012 11:11:20 AM PST by Finny ("Raise hell. Vote smart." -- Ted Nugent)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

Comment #198 Removed by Moderator

To: Bigtigermike

Palin was on Fox news yesterday, still solidly promoting Newt.


199 posted on 02/19/2012 11:14:40 AM PST by conservativejoy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: CainConservative
You're stating flatly tht Palin voted for Huckabee?

I just spent about 10 minutes searcing "Palin voted for Huckabee." Are you talking out your ass or do you have a source, a link, a place to show how you know this? Huckabee dropped out on March 4.

You sound like the Romney supporter here eight years ago, I've forgotten which one now, who regularly stated as "fact" that Rush Limbaugh voted for Romney, and even went so far as to claim Rush said so on one of his shows.

Romney supporters were brazen in their willingness to LIE and deliberately misrepresent in order to argue folks to their side.

What a coincidence.

200 posted on 02/19/2012 11:31:42 AM PST by Finny ("Raise hell. Vote smart." -- Ted Nugent)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-100101-150151-200201-250 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson