I think at least they're doing it the right way, which is going through voters, giving them a chance to vote and not having a handful of judges arbitrarily impose their will. I don't agree with it, I would vote no if it were on a referendum where I was but at least they're doing it the right way.
I guess you missed the part of the quote where Newt says he doesn't agree with it. Once again, he's putting the power in the hands of the voters - where it should be.
posted on 02/25/2012 5:55:27 AM PST
(Barack has a memory like a steel trap; it's a gift ~ Michelle Obama)
I guess you missed the part of the quote where Newt says he doesn't agree with it.
Yep. Further, he stated that he believes the issue will eventually be dealt with at the federal level, and he supports a Constitutional amendment defining marriage as between a man and a woman. I hate politico, and would be happy if we never saw their trash posted on FR.
posted on 02/25/2012 8:41:25 AM PST
(Klepto Baracka Marxo, impeach we much.)
Can we have referendums limiting free speech? can we have referendums legalizing rape?
Newt would vote no, of course, but at least it can be done the “right way”
posted on 02/25/2012 9:52:14 AM PST
(The Right to Life came before the Right to Pursue Happiness)
posted on 02/25/2012 9:53:55 AM PST
(O Lord, Guide Our Nation)
Once again, he’s putting the power in the hands of the voters - where it should be. You exactly right!
posted on 02/25/2012 10:15:14 AM PST
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson