Posted on 03/03/2012 4:40:33 AM PST by Yooperman
Here we go again.
Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, Mark Levin, Chris Plante and others had nothing to say about the news of Sheriff Joe's investigation.
What/who is controlling them?
I thought it was on FOX News with Brett Baier on “the Grapevine”
Hannity is neutered blah blah blah, the good twin of blowhard O Reilly
Notice the Trump was silenced
any gumshoe could run a check on the faux ssn’s and expose this guy, so why hasn’t anyone?
God Keep Sheriff Joe
Now that FOX is the one to reveal the videos, they will be edited and not at all what Breitbart would have released.
Too bad they won’t be released as Breitbart would have done it, and why are they not being released on one of Breitbart’s own websites?
Do we know for a fact that the FOX release is a change in ABs plan?
I’ve never heard anything concrete about their release - how or when...
There is no upside to getting on the bandwagon.
You could have film of him being born in Kenya and there would be no follow up legal action to remove him.
The media will not find it interesting or alarming.
The courts won’t touch it.
Congress won’t touch it.
Nothing would ever happen.
So, there is no merit continuing on this path.
Your outrage is of no value.
Just beat him at the ballot box.
Everything else is a waste of time.
Ask Breitbart.
The videos WILL be on HANNITY. Sean Hannity and Andrew were close friends and Steve Bannon has said he WILL be back on HANNITY show approx 7-10 days with video! They are going through the videos now and getting ready to be presented.
I understand that Breitbart's staff people are dedicated, savvy, fearless, well-trained patriots who can be trusted to carry on the work as intended. No doubt the widow owns the business and the rights now, anyhow.
The videos will get the widest audience on Fox, rest assured. Plus, I can't picture the Breitbart enterprise turning over unlimited contract editing rights to Fox or anyone else.
Breitbart's wishes will be respected, I have no doubt.
Leni
That’s good information and I’m glad to know it, Leni. Thanks
My bad
The sheriff Joe investigation/actions will only EXPAND, it will have to be covered by news media.
“There is no upside to getting on the bandwagon.
You could have film of him being born in Kenya and there would be no follow up legal action to remove him.
The media will not find it interesting or alarming.
The courts won’t touch it.
Congress won’t touch it.
Nothing would ever happen.
So, there is no merit continuing on this path.
Your outrage is of no value.
Just beat him at the ballot box.
Everything else is a waste of time.”
At least someone else agrees with me.
I do not think Obama was pre-selected or groomed to be POTUS. I think that just happened because he was a good public speaker in the Chicago machine.
Remember Jesse Jackson’s reaction to BHO’s campaign - “cut his nuts out”? Quite a few black leaders were upset that BHO jumped the gun and ran. They were hoping to have more time to clean things up.
“The sheriff Joe investigation/actions will only EXPAND, it will have to be covered by news media.”
Who will cover it? The NY Times? Bill O’Reilly? Maybe CBS News? Oh, NBC will certainly cover it, right? How about ABC News?
It will NEVER be covered by the media. Anyone who thinks otherwise needs to step back, take a deap breath, shake their heads in disbelief at the insanity that is whirling around them and find something else to concentrate on to remove the Marxist of questionable origins from the White House.
Well, nit-wit Todd Schnitt had PLENTY to say....and every bit of it was how nuts and bizzare Birthers are. He screamed at callers that Arpaio was just an attention seeker.
Why should they rock the boat? Better to ignore it and keep Obama on the ticket than to get rid of him and face Hillary. Plus why muddy the water for Jindal and Rubio?
Reps don’t care any more about the Constitution than the Dems too. They just do a better job of acting like it.
We shall see, if and when the Breitbart video of obama/Ayers/college days are released. The domestic terrorists put on suits and infiltrated our governmental institutions. The obama/ayers connection is an example. I disagree with you, I think obama was groomed for exactly what is happening now.
What astounds me the most is how people today think Barry Hussein Soetoro AKA Obama is not a Communist.
And the press, from here on out, will see Arpaio as just another WND employee.
What astounds me the most is how people today think Barry Hussein Soetoro AKA Obama is not a Communist.
Common sense.
I dont think you’re going to find Ayers on these tapes - If we take Steve Bannon at his word - (he called them “Obama Harvard Tapes”) - which sounds more late 80s, than late 70s.
But - I would love to hear what happened at the Brietbart-Ayers dinner meeting a few nights before.
Maybe it’s because they think — like I do - that it’s a total waste of time and money which would be far better spent on defeating Zero at the ballot box in November?
I certainly would like to know too but I agree with those here that elements of fear must be in the mix. Fear based on direct threats from govt. sources of power/their lackeys? - quite possible.
But even if it is as simple as their bosses’ threats, we can’t blame Rush or anybody else to not weigh in the self interested concerns emmanating from being thrown off the air. We can speculate that’s a terrible and selfish attitude on his or anyone’s else part who is similarly situated, but c’mon folks, who among us free patriots wouldn’t allow for their self concern for their living? They aren’t sucking off the govt. They are independent entrepenuers. But they have rules imposed on them.
I hate it for sure. But what would any of us do? There may be a time coming soon where we all have some pretty heavy decisions to make that include making a sacrafice of our very lives or freedom. I’m hoping for now that for me and mine, its just who for or whether I’m even going to vote. In light of everything I think I’m gonna have to vote for that weirdo from MA or MI or from whatever planet he’s hoping to rule in the afterlife.
That kind of rabid behavior is only born out of idiocy or fear. Which is the case for this guy you’re talking about?
We’re seen Glenn Beck act the same way and Glenn Beck is not an idiot.
The media have just had a reminder that young reporters in their prime of life who have just interviewed Joe Arpaio can all of a sudden have a heart attack and die.
Expect them to hysterically try to silence the facts. The “threats” theory predicts that to happen. Now everybody observe what happens. One of the big measures of a theory is whether it accurately predicts what will happen.
IF HE’S THE NOMINEE I should say!!!
The news media does not have to cover this. Did they cover Kerry’s Swiftboat scandal...except to laugh at the people exposing it?
If Rush brings this up...what happened to him last week...the stuff done by the msm will pale.
Anybody that brings up Obama’s phoney LFBC/Draft card...will be history.
The only guy who would not back down from the threats was Brietbart. His death is a cautionary tale...think Tucker Carlson and others who were close to Andrew haven’t noticed?
Tapes of Obama in college were to emerge on March 1, the day of Brietbart’s death...today’s the 3rd...nothing yet...think folks arent’ thinking about the implications?
So we should beat Obama at the polls??? Then what...put a liberal from Massachusetts in office.
Oh...yeah, THAT’s the ticket.
Maybe they actually have an interest in winning in 2012. The BC issue is a sure ticket to loss of both houses in addition to the presidential election, most contested governorships and state legislatures.
I’m really tired of the idea that a little liberal is better than a big liberal...not so. The two party system, where liberals are nominated by both...is a trap that leads to...more liberalism.
Long past time...if Romney is the nominee...a serious third party movement, perhaps led by Gingrich is necessary.
Perot did it in ‘92...and it can be done today.
In what serious way is Romney different from Obama?
Like I said...you obviously haven’t been paying attention.
Well, let’s see...
He doesn’t want to radically transform our country in a Marxist direction.
He doesn’t want to continue apologizing to our enemies.
He doesn’t want to allow doctors to kill babies even after they are born alive.
He doesn’t have a desire to put lestists on the Supreme Court who will view our own Constitution as obsolete and favor looking to foreign law.
He isn’t part of the corrupt and evil Chicago machine.
He was not a revolutionary Marxist schooled by Bill Ayers.
He doesn’t have a desire to redistribute wealth regardless of its effect on freedom and the economy.
He doesn’t hate his country.
Need more?
He’s Obama writ small. He wants the same national health insurance...he is for big government...and more taxes...he’s been for abortion before he was against it...he supported homosexual marriage.
The list goes on and on and on. He’d manage the rot Obama plans to cave-in.
In the end...not enough difference to matter.
No more Doles, McCains, or Romneys...let’s have the GOP stand for conservativism. Romney is no conservative.
When a county judge demands proof of identification to be on the ballot, you’re going to see shit hit the fan. These detectives are going to be called in to testify.
so you are saying he is an eligible fraud, nothing to see here? Would you vote for a fraud?
No, I would not vote for a fraud. I would not vote for Obama anyway. I do not understand why he was allowed to run with all of his past history sealed. How did that happen?
Every candidate up until these last two election cycles, with one exception who did not get caught until out of office, qualified for the office. Now we have Romney, Santorum, McCain, Obama and two VP possibles Jindal and Rubio all of whom fail to qualify because the are not Natural Born Citizens. Do you think this a coincidence?
I've noticed the same thing. Remember how Orin Hatch was drooling over Arnold Schwarzenegger for President?
They are all in on it.
“What/who is controlling them?”
Sanity?
Romney is my least favorite of all the candidates, but he doesn’t represent near the danger to America as obama does...
/////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
I believe that Romney “is” far more dangerous to America than Obama is.
I will not vote for either of them!
In what serious way is Romney different from Obama?
///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
Obama wants to be liked. Romney could not care less and will ram totalitarian control down our throats.
I saw that. I notice it’s impossible to report the story without giving even more time to the DOJ’s investigation of Arpaio. And a nice chuckle in there too.
The Breitbart death serves the "Obama" team on several levels:
1. It disrupts the news cycle (as did the bomb scare at Limbaugh's house) so that the media talking heads have something, anything to report other than the findings of Sheriff Joe's Cold Case Possse.
2. Gets rid of a (from their perspective) persistent threat.
3. Sends a very clear and chilling message to any journalists out there contemplating reporting on the issue of "Obama"'s background, including eligibility ramifications, with the seriousness it surely merits.
A colleague of mine and I were discussing the day before the press conference what big news event would take place that would distract from reporting on the Cold Case Posse investigation results. Bam! Right on schedule.
The NDAA went into effect Thursday. We sure heard all the media screeching about that didn’t we? No?
Advertisers, you’re right.
Rush, he’s lost many over slutgate.
They are afraid of being accused of treason.
Timidity will cost them much more.
I was a regular for Rush for almost 20 years. I heard the slut joke and loved it. When he refused to call for the bc I dropped Rush.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.