Skip to comments.“Conspiracy theorist” – just another form of namecalling from the class who want to be Global Rulers
Posted on 03/19/2012 11:20:28 AM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach
Conspiracy Theorist the taunt you use when you want to win the debate without having to argue your point.
When someone points out that the Regulating Class want to bring on a world government, theyre called a conspiracy theorist. When the king-pins of the Regulating Class, or their media apostles, actually admit they rather love the idea of a world government, where are the retractions? They cant hold an honest conversation, let alone budget, plan and spend your money wisely.
Gary Stix former Scientific American writer blogs that he used to edit articles on nuclear fusion and clean coal, but now thinks he ought to have written more on psychology, sociology and economics. (See, when their attempts at logic, reason and evidence dont win over the crowd, the anointed need to explain how stupid, flawed and selfish people are.)
Effective World Government Will Be Needed to Stave Off Climate Catastrophe
Unfortunately, far more is needed. To be effective, a new set of institutions would have to be imbued with heavy-handed, transnational enforcement powers. There would have to be consideration of some way of embracing head-in-the-cloud answers to social problems that are usually dismissed by policymakers as academic naivete. In principle, species-wide alteration in basic human behaviors would be a sine qua non, but that kind of pronouncement also profoundly strains credibility in the chaos of the political sphere. Some of the things that would need to be contemplated: How do we overcome our hard-wired tendency to discount the future: valuing what we have today more than what we might receive tomorrow? Would any institution be capable of instilling a permanent crisis mentality lasting decades, if not centuries? How do we create new institutions with enforcement powers way beyond the current mandate of the U.N.?
[Scientific American Blog]
Stix goes on to wonder: Could we ensure against a malevolent dictator who might abuse the power of such organizations?
Dear Gary, could we? Lets check the current UN record for success? They are the visionaries guarding-little-citizens who put Gaddafi in charge of human rights, and North Korea in charge of Nuclear Disarmament. Last week they endorsed a 2010 report where some of the worlds most repressive governments like Algeria, Iran, and Syria praised the Gaddafi regimes human rights record. Not a single country objected. OK. So you think these are people that ought to have even more power over us? These guys are not even trying, not even pretending anymore that they need to look nice and rational. There is not even a pretense. Gaddafi thinks human rights means he has the right to bombs his own people and the big news is that UN is thinking twice about hailing him as a humanitarian hero?
But the UN are thinking about reviewing their 2010 report that praised Gaddafis human rights record. So thats alright then.
Protection against malevolent dictators comes from a free press and a free vote, and most of the world doesnt have that, and even the parts that do are suffering from big-governmentitis. The best protection from dictators comes from competing nation states, competing media outlets, competing companies, competing political parties, and you get the idea. The best way to guarantee global tyranny is have a global government.
GREENS leader Bob Brown whose party assumes sole balance of power in the Senate tomorrow - wants Australia to join an international push for a global parliament. This peoples assembly would be based on one person, one vote, one value and was being vigorously promoted in Europe and the United Nations, he said yesterday. (See the Youtube)
The English language cant keep up with the Certified Global Nonsense. We dont even have the words to describe the convoluted situations the alarmist-big-government brains think up. What is the word to encompass a situation where the people throwing the insults condescendingly disdain those they oppose, even as they agree with them? What is it apart from a random tribal missive of hypocrisy? Please suggest words from other languages, acronyms or an entirely new word. Time to brainstorm.
H/t to Australian Climate Madness
Other related posts:
UN totalitarians want your money and your life
Billions of dollars sneaks out the door through UN committees
BREAKING NEWS! The abdication of the West the sting at Cancun
Ecocide? Bring it on (in a Western government court).
Flashback to Bali: UN tactics to silence dissent
I always enjoyed conspiracy theories tho I didn’t believe any of them. You have to admit some of them are interesting.
For the most part I still don’t believe in them and certainly don’t know how they operate but I am beginning to wonder.
The first thing which makes me wonder is just how well organized the French Revolution and Russian Revolution were. Obviously there were people behind the scenes doing some remarkable planning.
I do think it has a lot to do with Communism but maybe even deeper than that and yes I also wonder about these secret societies (probably not the Masons). Maybe there really is an Illuminati or something similar.
Every human being, to one degree or another, uses whatever influence they have to alter their environments and affect the outcomes of events that concern them. Similarly, groups of people with common goals and objectives band together to multiply their power and influence towards achieving them.
IMHO, it's only rational to believe that the über-wealthy and powerful would do the same...in fact, it's counter-intuitive to believe they would not. If Glenn Beck has done nothing
I can believe in uber-wealthy conspiring in trying to retain power forever. They have the time, as they have servants for everything.
There was, but it's since morphed. Want to know that history?
Knowledge can lead to head aches. My headache began roughly back in 1972 with the purchase of the original None Dare Call It Conspiracy by Gary Allen. I should never had loaned it out. Book is long gone. But what it contained sticks in the brain pretty much.
You’d best start believing some of them!
Your call on this one.
Yes. Another book I purchased, due to your advertising it. So much in it taken across the board that would be hard to argue against.
Mao and Stalin must be sooooo proud of him.
Rather appropriate at that. :)
It’s available at archive.org in pdf & ebook formats.
Thanks for the link. I downloaded the pdf version book to my system. I can see it even contains some of the original photos. My. Been a few years since I read this one. :)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.