Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why, if there is an election in November, it will come down to Romney and Obama
Email | March 21, 2012 | Rev Bob Celeste

Posted on 03/21/2012 6:03:41 PM PDT by SLB

Why, if there is an election in November, it will come down to Romney and Obama.

Just about any question a man, woman, or child could have, God has answered in His book, the Holy Bible. Just as He has answered the question "how did the world get here?" He has also told us why, if there is an election this coming November, it will be between a Muslim and a Mormon, Obama and Romney, Obama and Obama Lite.

And the devil, taking Him(Jesus) up into an high mountain, shewed unto Him all the kingdoms of the world in a moment of time. And the devil said unto Him, "All this power will I give Thee, and the glory of them: for that is delivered unto me; and to whomsoever I will I give it. If thou therefore wilt worship me, all shall be Thine."

And Jesus answered and said unto him, saying: "Get thee behind Me, Satan: for it is written, Thou shalt worship the Lord thy God, and Him only shalt thou serve." Luke 4:5-8 ACP/KJV

When satan offered the Lord God of all things, dominion over all of the G0vts of earth, he said that he could do that for what has been given to him, he can give to anyone he wants. Jesus did not contradict that, He simply said that only God should be worshiped not some two bit corrupt fallen arc angel. And there, right there in Luke chapter four we find the reason why, if there are elections this coming November, it will be Obama vs Romney. Two of satan's own, satan cannot, or so he thinks, loose either way.

Mormons believe that Jesus is not God, they do not believe in the Trinity, they believe that Jesus is but the son of God, an arc angle, making Him nothing more than the half brother of Michael, Gabriel and Lucifer aka satan.

Muslims believe that Jesus was nothing more than a prophet or in some cultures only a good teacher, not Go, they like the Mormons do not believe in the trinity.




TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: election; iag4obama; iag4romney; obama4romney; obama4romneycare; romney4obama; romney4obamacare; soros4obama; soros4romney

1 posted on 03/21/2012 6:03:42 PM PDT by SLB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SLB

Yes, it appears the contest will be between Romney and BHO.
both support abortion
both support gun grabs
both support homosexual agenda
both support man made global warming
both support big government
both support government mandates
both support working with democrats
The only difference I have been able to find is that one thinks he will be god, the other one thinks he already is.


2 posted on 03/21/2012 6:08:52 PM PDT by svcw (CLEAN WATER & Education http://www.longlostsis.com/PI/MayanHelp2012.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SLB

As of now, I don’t see elections in November. I see martial law before elections.


3 posted on 03/21/2012 6:11:13 PM PDT by Gatún(CraigIsaMangoTreeLawyer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SLB

The illusion of choice.


4 posted on 03/21/2012 6:13:13 PM PDT by dfwgator (Don't wake up in a roadside ditch. Get rid of Romney.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GatĂșn(CraigIsaMangoTreeLawyer)
>"I see martial law before elections."

Depends on how fast he can Presidentially Pardon the vast majority of the Penal system, and recruit them into his private army.

5 posted on 03/21/2012 6:17:52 PM PDT by rawcatslyentist (Mohammedan law every woman must belong to a man will delay the end of slavery until Islam has ceased)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SLB; a fool in paradise

I tell ya, Bishop Romney would be a perfect VP - going to foreign funerals and baptizing deceased dead leaders.


6 posted on 03/21/2012 6:19:20 PM PDT by Revolting cat! (Let us prey!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: svcw
Great read here!

http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2012/03/21/thomas-sowell-romneys-got-the-money-but-newts-got-the-vision?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+BigGovernment+%28Big+Government%29

7 posted on 03/21/2012 6:21:45 PM PDT by seekthetruth (I want a Commander In Chief who honors and supports our Military!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SLB

Reverend, there’s plenty of difference between ‘bam and Romney:

One has actual executive experience and shown an ability to deal with the dems. Yes, that entails compromise, but I don’t consider that a fault.
One has raised a family to adulthood and to my knowledge, none of his kids has gone to jail. The other, well who knows.
One is actually married and appears to love his wife.
One is an American Citizen.
One made his own money.
One can tell you who is father really is.
One believes in God.

We’re electing a president, not a dictator. If we want conservative values, we need to focus on the Senate and the House.

We’ve got a full-fledged criminal in the White House and voting him out may not be enough to get rid of him. If my hunch is right, ‘bam has committed actual crimes— crimes serious enough to land him in the penitentiary. So it’s very possible that for ‘bam, much more is at stake than his mere ego— though that alone is dangerous enough.

It’s time this circular firing squad ended. There is serious work ahead.


8 posted on 03/21/2012 6:27:59 PM PDT by tsomer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GatĂșn(CraigIsaMangoTreeLawyer)
I see martial law before elections.

...who do you suppose will "enforce" the martial law?

There are, don't you know, millions of us armed Americans who will not take kindly to any "martial law".

I would think that anyone trying this would cause CWII to start....if this is what "they" want, martial law would most likely provoke the intended outcome.

9 posted on 03/21/2012 6:29:10 PM PDT by B.O. Plenty (Elections have consequences....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: tsomer
It’s time this circular firing squad ended. There is serious work ahead.

The only circular firing squad around here are those trying to get conservatives to vote for a sure loser like Romney.

If you really think Romney is going to beat Obama, I've got a bridge in Brooklyn to sell you.

Obama, and his minions in the MSM, will utterly destroy Romney using his own record:

1. Supported and forced Gay Adoption
2. Implemented and supported Gay Marriage in MA.
3. Supported the Brady Bill
4. Implemented an "Assault" Weapons Ban in MA AFTER the Federal Ban expired.
5. Supports and believes in Man-Made Global Warming
6. Supported a State-Level Cap-and-Trade system in MA.
7. Supported TARP
8. Did not support GWB tax cuts
9. Supported Amnesty for Illegal Aliens(Pathway to Citizenship)
10. Implemented a Socialist Healthcare Program (RomneyCare) including a $50 Abortion and an Individual Mandate.



Couple his horrendous Progressive Liberal record with his constant lying and you have the worst possible candidate that the GOP could have fielded.

Romney can't win. You are pushing the only person who cannot win the Presidency.
10 posted on 03/21/2012 6:55:41 PM PDT by SoConPubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: SLB

So if I wanted to vote for the Christian guy ....


11 posted on 03/21/2012 7:14:51 PM PDT by Mike Darancette (Romney just makes me tired all over.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SLB

I agree.


12 posted on 03/21/2012 7:47:14 PM PDT by bimboeruption (Clinging to my Bible and my HK.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie
1. Supported and forced Gay Adoption Where did you hear this?

2. Implemented and supported Gay Marriage in MA.
He did not support gay marriage, did support anti-discrimination measures.

in Massachusetts

3. Supported the Brady Bill
4. Implemented an "Assault" Weapons Ban in MA AFTER the Federal Ban expired.
True, he supported the five day waiting period and the ban on assault weapons in Massachusetts.

5. Supports and believes in Man-Made Global Warming
Has admitted the possibility of global warning, but isn't in favor of wrecking the economy.

6. Supported a State-Level Cap-and-Trade system in MA. At first he did but then pushed for a cap on fees charged to businesses in Massachusetts . He now says he opposes cap'n trade.

7. Supported TARP Lately he's said Tarp made the economy worse.

8. Did not support GWB tax cuts<
He supported the second round of Bush Tax cuts.

9. Supported Amnesty for Illegal Aliens(Pathway to Citizenship)

He does not support blanket pardons of all illegals. He's in favor of secure borders. While governor he was in favor of law enforcement detention of illegals.

10. Implemented a Socialist Healthcare Program (RomneyCare) including a $50 Abortion and an Individual Mandate.
In Massachusetts.

No, he's not perfect and he's changed positions and still holds some we don't agree with. Does that remind you of any of the other candidates?

I'm convinced that much of this virulent anti-Romney stuff is coming from the dems, who see this as a wedge. People are quick to --as Voltaire I think said-- make the best the enemy of the good.

Romney will be the nominee. Your choice is between him and Obama; not voting is a vote for Obama.

13 posted on 03/21/2012 8:41:28 PM PDT by tsomer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: tsomer

I have a suggestion for you: CHECK YOUR FACTS. Oh yes, Mitt Romney did push for gay marriage in Massachusetts and anyone who said he didn’t is out to lunch.


14 posted on 03/21/2012 11:18:53 PM PDT by sruleoflaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: sruleoflaw

>>...Oh yes, Mitt Romney did push for gay marriage in Massachusetts...<<

I’ll take you at your word. I’m not a Romney fan. My choices are anyone-but-Romney in the primary and anyone-but-Obama in the general. If Romney is opposing Obama in the general, I’m voting for Romney. I will not vote for Obama, nor will I fail to do what I can to vote against Obama. Our choices stink. But I will not fall into the false thinking that allowing Obama another term will somehow teach the GOP or the country a “lesson”. For one, the GOP could care less. They will happily accept the status-quo if that’s all they can get.

I fully realize that more folks are voting for Romney than other more desireable candidates. I don’t like it and I can’t understand it, but if Romney gets the most votes, then he’ll be the nominee. That is how it’s supposed to work.

The *WHY* is our job to figure out and overcome...
Is it MSM propgandizing?
Is it that our preferred candidates are viewed as “too conservative” by the voters?
Is it because we put up a laughably weak field of candidates?
Could we have done more to support those candidates?
Could we have taken a more active role in the process?
Should we each, *PERSONALLY*, do more to sway voters and grow our numbers?
Were these candidates the best we can come up with?
etc...

I suspect the truth is a little or a lot of all of those in combination.

This election should be a galvanizing lesson to what needs to be done for next time. Now, we just have to figure out how to tackle that laundry list of things we failed to do adequately & properly this time.

In the meantime, doing everything we can to oust Obama is all we can realistically expect to accomplish at this point. If that means I have to vote for Romney, you better bet your last nickle I’m going to do it. I’ll keep my powder dry and look to the next election and hope I can do something more to help. Regardless of the outcome, I doubt the GOP will be wounded in the slightest this time. Next time, I hope they get their @$$3$ handed to them by patriotic, constitutional conservatives.

I personally think that means we have to find a leader who will coalesce the tea-partier’s into a solid, reliable, voting-bloc. Right now, I think we are too scatter-shot and I place the blame for that *entirely* on poor to non-existent leadership — and I mean *organic* leadership. Reagan had it and could attract, motivate and convince. I truly believe there are other’s with those leadership qualities. We just have to identify them, support them and promote them.


15 posted on 03/22/2012 4:39:14 AM PDT by jaydee770
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: sruleoflaw
CHECK YOUR FACTS. Oh yes, Mitt Romney did push for gay marriage in Massachusetts

Well, I double checked and I don't see where this is stated.

So maybe you can help me out here: what's the URL of that Soros-funded information trove where you formed your verdict?

16 posted on 03/22/2012 8:15:17 PM PDT by tsomer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: tsomer; sruleoflaw; jaydee770
2. Implemented and supported Gay Marriage in MA.

He did not support gay marriage, did support anti-discrimination measures.


In fact, it was Governor Mitt Romney who was ultimately responsible for same-sex "marriages" taking place. The Supreme Judicial Court only issued an opinion and advised the Legislature to act (which it never did). Even the Court acknowledged that it had no power to change the law.

Governor Romney created these "marriages" through an unconstitutional and illegal directive to his Department of Public Health (to print new "marriage" licenses), and through his legal counsel threatened to fire any Town Clerk or Justice of the Peace who failed to implement the (non-existent) "new law". He was not required by any constitutional mandate to do these things. On the contrary, his actions clearly violated his oath to uphold the laws of Massachusetts.


. . . . . .

What happened then? The Legislature did nothing. It took no action. So after the 180 days Gov. Romney took action on his own!

1. Gov. Romney's Legal Counsel issued a directive to the Justices of the Peace that they must perform same-sex marriages when requested or "face personal liability" or be fired. (At least one Justice of the Peace, Linda Gray Kelley, was forced to resign for religious reasons.)

See Associated Press article, "Justices of the peace warned not to discriminate against same sex couples" April 25, 2004.

2. Romney's staff held training sessions for Town Clerks, warning them to "implement" the Court decision and "uphold the law" -- although the training document admits that the marriage statutes have not been changed.

3. Romney directed his Department of Public Health to change the state marriage license to read "Party A" and Party "B", replacing "Husband" and "Wife". None of this was required by any law passed by the legislature or even ordered by the court.


So if you read the article, Mitt did an end-run around the Legislature and forced the issue of Gay Marriage.

As with everything Mitt Romney says, it's what he actually does that counts, not his words.

If his lips are moving, you know he is lying.

Mitt Romney is a Liar!


Finally, you accused another poster of finding their information from a SOROS funded source. I dare you to find where MassResistance.com got any money from SOROS.

In fact, here is an article from their own site where they show that a "George Soros group attacking MassResistance over 'safe schools' czar research".

Nice false accusation. Got any other slimy, deceitful debating tricks you want to pull out of your bag?
17 posted on 03/23/2012 8:48:22 AM PDT by SoConPubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: tsomer
1. Supported and forced Gay Adoption

Where did you hear this?


Romney advocates homosexual couples' adoption rights be recognized by the government "There will be children born to same-sex couples, and adopted by same-sax couples, and I believe that there should be rights and privileges associated with those unions and with the children that are part of those unions." On another occasion, his spokesman "declined to state Romney's position on whether homosexual couples should be allowed to adopt, and declined to say whether the governor opposes gay adoptions."
- State House press conference, 6/15/2005
- Boston Globe, 3/2/2006

18 posted on 03/23/2012 9:10:07 AM PDT by SoConPubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie
"Finally, you accused another poster of finding their information from a SOROS funded source. I dare you to find where MassResistance.com got any money from SOROS.

Nice false accusation. Got any other slimy, deceitful debating tricks you want to pull out of your bag?

Look the fact is, Romney was never my first pick, but he's going to get the nomination, so I'm trying to go along in the knowledge that anyone will be better than 'bam. If 'bam gets another term--two supreme court appointments. There's at least a chance Romney would appoint someone with a brain who might wise up in time. Just one example.

The comment about the Soros funding was a general one. I didn't bring up MassResistance, you did. My point is that the conservative/moderate schism is being cultivated by Soros/'bam axis-- classic divide and conquer tactics and we're falling right in line.

19 posted on 03/23/2012 9:44:41 PM PDT by tsomer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson