Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

REMINDER: America Is Not The Biggest Winner In The Shale Gas Revolution
Business Insider ^ | 03/27/2012 | Gus Lubin

Posted on 03/27/2012 7:12:57 AM PDT by SeekAndFind

Americans are thrilled that the shale gas revolution could make their country the world's top energy producer by 2013. But in the long term there's another country that benefits even more.

China has 25.05 trillion cubic meters of recoverable shale gas resources, compared to only 12-13 trillion cubic meters in the US.

Barclays' Scott Darling says China could follow the US model in developing its resources:

China continues to outline its non-conventional gas targets. The government has the set 6.5bcm/year by 2015 and 60-100bcm/year for shale gas production by the end of the decade. Although we believe that these targets may seem ambitious, the pace of progress in acquiring non-conventional asset for technology/process knowledge and domestic developments is starting to gather pace. China is committed to supporting development with numerous overseas joint ventures (JVs) and acquisitions for exploratory technology and production experience...

We have previously highlighted the challenges facing China’s non-conventional gas development, namely export pipeline availability to demand centres and water availability. However, while these factors are important, we believe the key issues in determining the pace of shale gas developments in China relate to development economics, application of technology and project management rather than geology and resource quality. For most of the shale gas deposits in China, the technology is in place (ie the US and most parts of China are based on the same type of marine shales).

(Excerpt) Read more at businessinsider.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Society
KEYWORDS: energy; naturalgas; shalegas

1 posted on 03/27/2012 7:13:02 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Well, good. The less pressure China puts on world energy sources the better. It’s also another way to marginalize the political importance of the Arab states.


2 posted on 03/27/2012 7:19:56 AM PDT by BfloGuy (The final outcome of the credit expansion is general impoverishment.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BfloGuy

Exactly. Economics is not a zero-sum game.


3 posted on 03/27/2012 7:20:41 AM PDT by Scutter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: BfloGuy; Scutter

And, China has more than double the population of the US, leaving the per-capita amount much lower.


4 posted on 03/27/2012 8:22:04 AM PDT by SuzyQue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

The important thing regarding the U.S. share, and exploitation of the U.S. share of shale gas reserves, is not who has more than us but what our share can do for our own domestic energy requirements along with the enhanced energy and economic security with becoming less reliant on foreign energy sources.

On percapita basis, I would imagine our share is greater than China’s, however, as I said above, even that is not the main point.


5 posted on 03/27/2012 8:52:13 AM PDT by Wuli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SuzyQue
And, China has more than double the population of the US, leaving the per-capita amount much lower.

That's an important point -- its population, hard as it is to believe, is more than four times ours. Which is why, even when, some day, their GDP equals ours, they will still only be 1/4 as rich.

6 posted on 03/27/2012 2:23:09 PM PDT by BfloGuy (The final outcome of the credit expansion is general impoverishment.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SuzyQue
And, China has more than double the population of the US, leaving the per-capita amount much lower.
Yeah, but I bet the number of people in China that own or have access to automobiles is still a tiny fraction of the US.
7 posted on 03/27/2012 6:42:26 PM PDT by Scutter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson