Posted on 03/27/2012 10:37:09 AM PDT by traumer
WASHINGTON, March 26, 2012 /PRNewswire via COMTEX/ -- Freedom Watch Only Group to Raise Issue in Amicus Brief
Today, the Supreme Court began oral arguments on the constitutionality of one of the most controversial pieces of legislation in the past fifty years. The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, referred to as "Obamacare," stretches the power of the federal government to a level never before seen. Yet this is not the most important decision the Court faces. Justice Elena Kagan, the former Solicitor General, is continuing to illegally preside over a case in which her impartiality has been seriously called into question.
Freedom Watch was the only group to file an amicus brief on the issue of Kagan's recusal and/or disqualification. Larry Klayman, the founder of Freedom Watch and before that Judicial Watch, has been the most ardent critic of the Court's avoidance of this issue. Never before has a justice, who championed legislation during its passage and crafted a legal defense for it, been able to preside over its validity. In no other court of the United States would this be acceptable.
The Supreme Court, in a showing of defiance that its impartiality would be called into question, not only refused to hear oral argument on the issue of recusal and/or disqualification from Mr. Klayman, but today Justice Kagan presided over the case. This is consistent with Chief Justice Roberts' outrageous claim that the Supreme Court is not bound to the same ethic standards as lower courts, and that these standards may be "unconstitutional" -- a fabricated position meant only to justify the court's illegal actions. This serves to delegitimize not only this decision but the Supreme Court as an institution.
(Excerpt) Read more at marketwatch.com ...
Perhaps that is her goal. delegitimize ... The Supreme Court, and by inference, all prior decisions of same as well as the Constitution which begat it all.
How better to institute the reign of or future lord and savior king barry the first?
and cuts, uhhh, the “carpet” with Kathleen Sebelius at Nora’s?
dismisses all integrity - makes a mockery of the Court and Constitution.
Sooooooooooooooooo-eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee-ahhhh!
Well you know, he just can't wait on the Supreme Court...
.
And who’s surprised?
It’s Pat!!!!
Since when does an ultra-liberal lesbian Supreme Court Justice with a conflict of interest have ethics ???
she shows NO respect for her employers...We the People....
Soo...
her name now is the “Unethical Elena Kagan”. Said over and over and over. No FReeper should refer to her in any other way. Name it.
Good God, you almost choked me with that one.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.