Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Call of the wild: Amazing reaction of wolves who come running when woman who befriended them in wood
Daily Mail ^ | 3/29/12 | Anthony Bond

Posted on 03/29/2012 3:12:16 PM PDT by Nachum

They are related to the domestic dog, which many of us live with side-by-side each day.

But despite their friendly relations, wolves are not known for getting on quite so well with humans.

Often living in the wilderness, they are fearsome predators which can bring down animals twice their size.

But as these incredible images show, they clearly have a softer side.

When a woman - known only as Anita - returned to the pack of wolves which she had socialised with for two years they reacted with sheer delight.

As she sat in the snow, the four wolves raced down a hillside towards her - something which would normally strike terror in any human being.

But rather than looking for something to eat, the wolves simply wanted to be reunited with the woman they obviously adore.

(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...


TOPICS: Outdoors; Pets/Animals
KEYWORDS: befriended; canids; dogs; wild; wolves; wood; woof
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-54 last
To: rintense

That surprises me, even if it’s at Yellowstone, and especially if it isn’t. Wolves are similar in some ways to “wild Malamutes” (and the same size) so I guess its possible with some of them to be like that. I expect wolves to sense people and get out of the area even before people would notice they are there. Personally, I’d love to see a wolf from a distance. I’d watch it, leave it alone, respect it, and avoid a close encounter that can harm either of us. Hopefully I can get to Isle Royale in a couple of years and catch them and the moose.


41 posted on 03/29/2012 7:41:50 PM PDT by Darren McCarty (Time for brokered convention)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: South Hawthorne

Not really. You can’t socialize with a bear the same as a pack of wolves. Bears are solitary mostly and they can’t grow up with you in a pack as there are no bear packs. Anything else that is a pack animal it can be possible. Geese, wild turkeys, etc can all accept a person to a degree as one of their own.


42 posted on 03/29/2012 7:43:07 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man (I'd like to tell you, but then I'd have to kill you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Lex Gabba

I don’t see them at my place, but I sometimes hear them. “Yelp, yelp, yelp, yelp.”


43 posted on 03/29/2012 7:44:15 PM PDT by Darren McCarty (Time for brokered convention)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Secret Agent Man

Wild turkeys run when they see me. For some reason, they don’t want to be the next family Thanksgiving meal.


44 posted on 03/29/2012 7:46:38 PM PDT by Darren McCarty (Time for brokered convention)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
Wolves are beautiful animals. But, they are wild animals, and need to be respected as such. They seemed to get a little aggressive at the end of the video.
45 posted on 03/29/2012 8:10:10 PM PDT by Pajamajan (Pray for our nation. Thank the Lord for everything you have. Do it today. Don't wait.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steamburg; GladesGuru
Sorry, 90% of all statistics are fabricated to make the statement look smart.

Well then smart people like you can start with Wikipedia:

Territorial fights are among the principal causes of wolf mortality: one study on wolf mortality in Minnesota and the Denali National Park and Preserve concluded that 14–65% of wolf deaths were due to predation by other wolves.[92] In fact, 91% of wolf fatalities occur within 3.2 km (2.0 mi) of the borders between neighboring territories.[93] Because the consequences of trespassing can be fatal, such incursions are thought to be largely due to desperation or deliberate aggressiveness.[90]

It sounds bad out of context, but starvation is a function of the available range carrying capacity.

That is an oversimplification to the point of uselessness. Wolves do kill for sport. They do kill each other for territorial reasons. Yet territorial conflict rises when food becomes more scarce. So you can take your BS up with Mech because he's the top wolf biologist in the country. The Coronation Island experiment showed that wolves will eat the last breeding female when they have depleted the land of game. Without a predator of wolves or virtually unlimited territory, that's what they do.

Wolf is not the preferred diet of the wolf.

Correct. However, when the "preferred diet" is depleted they do eat each other, especially because they grow in population by some 25-35% per year without external regulation. Here in the US the higher number is the rule because 75% of what they eat, by weight, is cattle. As long as that is the case, there will be sufficient wolves to extirpate some of their prey species (it's called a "predator pit," in a multi-prey environment, so I suggest you Google some of Tom Bergerud's papers and read them). In some cases it means that certain species may become endangered, which is where we are getting with caribou. The main reason in Alaska is that the Park Service will not budge from its idiotic "natural regulation" policy and has therefore excluded from the system its apex predator for the last 10,000 years: The American Indian.

On the other hand there are strong arguments that man killing man is the most natural behavior.

You clearly don't get it about what happens when you presume that nature is self-regulating on a continent shaped by humans. Canis lupis followed the bison across the Bering land bridge, its predecessor (Canis dirus) having been extirpated by man. There are some very interesting palynological arguments suggesting the bison had to have been driven, the straits at that time lacked sufficient food for them to cross on their own. It is not known whether the wolf was desired or reviled at that time, but they sure did make good fur coats.

Go back to the Farly Mowat School of wildlife biology where you belong. You do know that he made up the whole story in Never Cry Wolf, don't you?

46 posted on 03/29/2012 8:16:50 PM PDT by Carry_Okie (GunWalker: Arming "a civilian national security force that's just as powerful, just as well funded")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: potlatch

Isn’t that amazing? She obviously made an impression. I’m glad Deks found her.


47 posted on 03/30/2012 11:13:34 AM PDT by CatherineofAragon (I can haz Romney's defeat?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Carry_Okie

I’m surprised it took that many paragraphs to prove my argument.


48 posted on 03/30/2012 12:21:29 PM PDT by Steamburg (The contents of your wallet is the only language Politicians understand.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: CatherineofAragon; Shyla; deks

Yes, she was remembered and in all fairness we should ping her to this thread as she would probably enjoy it. Hope so anyway!


49 posted on 03/30/2012 12:41:14 PM PDT by potlatch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Chandler

lmao


50 posted on 03/30/2012 12:52:59 PM PDT by advertising guy (Sarah just jumped..........game on boys.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Yeah.. A little too much excitement for the wolfies.. The pack leader wasn’t pleased.


51 posted on 03/30/2012 1:26:52 PM PDT by DivineMomentsOfTruth ("Give me Liberty or I'll stand up and get it for myself!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All; Nachum

This was a fascinating episode of the Dog Whisperer meets Wolf Whisperer..
http://www.hulu.com/watch/184032/dog-whisperer-honoring-the-wolf


52 posted on 03/30/2012 1:38:57 PM PDT by DivineMomentsOfTruth ("Give me Liberty or I'll stand up and get it for myself!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: potlatch

I think I did ping her in one of those posts.....hope she is still around!


53 posted on 03/30/2012 5:35:12 PM PDT by CatherineofAragon (I can haz Romney's defeat?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: CatherineofAragon

I do too Catherine. Thought I checked her posts and she was here in early March......but maybe it was a year ago??


54 posted on 04/01/2012 5:40:09 PM PDT by potlatch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-54 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson