Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Will U.S. Troops Fire On American Citizens?
Theintelhub ^ | 1st April, 2012 | By Avalon & Shepard Ambellas

Posted on 04/02/2012 11:26:01 PM PDT by yank in the UK

The question of troop involvement in a possible upcoming Martial Law scenario that is being predicted is no imaginary possibility – nor is it a ‘conspiracy theory’. Other tough questions are being discussed such as, “Will the U.S. government confiscate Gold and Silver in an economic collapse?” and “Will there be a round-up of American Citizens to be put into FEMA Camps?” Many believe that the United Nations will be given authority to step in to keep the peace in any civil unrest or economic collapse. This is a strong possibility. Readers should be familiar with the term ‘Hidden In Plain Sight’. How this applies to the United Nations is simple.

(Excerpt) Read more at theintelhub.com ...


TOPICS: Conspiracy; Military/Veterans; Miscellaneous; Reference
KEYWORDS: peacekeeper; un; unelected
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-69 next last
Please read this in its entirety, it's worth the read.
1 posted on 04/02/2012 11:26:13 PM PDT by yank in the UK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: yank in the UK

)))ping((((


2 posted on 04/02/2012 11:27:23 PM PDT by unkus (Silence Is Consent)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yank in the UK
I feel a song coming on.

What it even means after all these years, I couldn't say. But there it is, Montana.

3 posted on 04/02/2012 11:41:44 PM PDT by dr_lew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yank in the UK

What do you mean “will they”....read some history.
Kent State would be a start.


4 posted on 04/02/2012 11:44:09 PM PDT by nvscanman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yank in the UK

Would the US military fire upon its own citizens?

Not as it is currently comprised.

However, if the US military eventually weeded out those who are loyal to the American Constitution and the America people then it becomes an open question.


5 posted on 04/02/2012 11:45:02 PM PDT by Jonty30 (What Islam and secularism have in common is that they are both death cults.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nvscanman

“Kent State would be a start.”

or WACO, Texas. But this time, I doubt the armed forces will still follow Klownie the Kenyan and his sasquatch wife. Most hate him.


6 posted on 04/02/2012 11:48:56 PM PDT by max americana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: nvscanman

7 posted on 04/02/2012 11:49:43 PM PDT by Salamander (You don't know what's going on inside of me. You don't wanna know what's running through my mind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: yank in the UK

“They” certainly will. A bundle of empirical evidence to that effect.


8 posted on 04/02/2012 11:51:13 PM PDT by moehoward
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: moehoward

” Will they confiscate gold and silver?”

I don’t have any of that. I do have some brass and lead. I don’t expect they will want that.


9 posted on 04/03/2012 12:13:45 AM PDT by donmeaker (Blunderbuss: A short weapon, ... now superceded in civilized countries by more advanced weaponry.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: moehoward

Can’t believe we’re even contemplating the idea. What year is this? For that matter what country?


10 posted on 04/03/2012 12:15:07 AM PDT by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: yank in the UK
39. I feel the President of the U.S. has the authority to pass his responsibilities as Commander-in-Chief to the U.N. Secretary General.

whoah nellie! walk that past me again?

11 posted on 04/03/2012 12:41:35 AM PDT by blueplum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All; yank in the UK; unkus; dr_lew; nvscanman; Jonty30; max americana; Salamander; moehoward; ...

What Good Can a Handgun Do Against An Army?
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-backroom/2312894/posts


12 posted on 04/03/2012 12:57:06 AM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet (Ich habe keinen Konig aber Gott)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: unkus
What do you think the rapid Islamo/Satano/Homo takeover of the US Armed Forces is all about?
 
Sounds like a means to an end.
 
Don't forget the confiscation of food from the frugal industrious "haves" so "community organizers" and their constituency can feast in luxury on their succor.
 
The ravenous, greedy beasts must be fed,  lest they eat their own, so "bitter clingers" will be their main target.
 
Not to mention looking the other way why "mercenaries" and "private contractors" do their dirty work. Mass slaughter and starvation.
 
Ya'll gonna sit home in November?
 
"They were horrible years!  Mothers were slicing their children and sticking them in pots to cook them, and then ate them. 
 
My mother went into the field where some horses were dying and brought back a horse's head.
 
About five women bit into this horse's head.  What a horror it was; people were dropping dead on the road. 
 
If you pierced them the blood was like water.  So many people died. 
 
I remember every thing in the village, including the time they took the crosses off the churches.  Two members from the Komsomol

(Communist Youth Organization) went up and took the crosses down."
 
http://www.ukrainiangenocide.org/survivors.html
 

13 posted on 04/03/2012 1:34:33 AM PDT by wolficatZ ("We are no longer accepting comments on this article")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: yank in the UK

The wrong question.

The right one: “Under what circumstances should American soldiers fire on US citizens, and when should they refuse to do so?”

Let us look at a not totally unlikely scenario.

Next November Obama loses the election to Romney. Massive rioting and murder breaks out across the country. Thousands die and the rioting is ongoing and spreading.

Should National Guard and Army troops refuse to fire on the rioters because they are US citizens?


14 posted on 04/03/2012 2:12:09 AM PDT by Sherman Logan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: null and void

Ping


15 posted on 04/03/2012 3:29:35 AM PDT by autumnraine (America how long will you be so deaf and dumb to the tumbril wheels carrying you to the guillotine?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yank in the UK; Sherman Logan; nvscanman; Jonty30; max americana; moehoward; caww; wolficatZ; ...

Federal troops in LA:

The Los Angeles (LA) riots were the most destructive civil disturbance in US history, causing the deaths of at least 54 people and more than $800 million in property damage throughout LA County.[6] More than 10,000 troops from the California National Guard (CANG), 2000 active component soldiers, and 1500 Marines were deployed to the area at the height of operations:

The 1992 Los Angeles Riots
Lessons in Command and Control from the Los Angeles Riots
Lieutenant Colonel Christopher M. Schnaubelt
1st Battalion, 185th Armor Regiment

“Police officers responded to a domestic dispute, accompanied by marines. They had just gone up to the door when two shotgun birdshot rounds were fired through the door, hitting the officers. One yelled `cover me!’ to the marines, who then laid down a heavy base of fire. . . . The police officer had not meant `shoot’ when he yelled `cover me’ to the marines. [He] meant . . . point your weapons and be prepared to respond if necessary. However, the marines responded instantly in the precise way they had been trained, where `cover me’ means provide me with cover using firepower. . . . over two hundred bullets [were] fired into that house.”

http://www.militarymuseum.org/LARiots1.html


16 posted on 04/03/2012 3:43:40 AM PDT by donna (Republicans won't change their ways until conservatives draw the line.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nvscanman

> What do you mean “will they”....read some history.
Kent State would be a start.

The troops that fired at Kent State were not experienced combat veterans. They were just as young and just as scared as the students they faced.
Had they been battlefield experienced, they’d have performed differently.


17 posted on 04/03/2012 4:49:01 AM PDT by BuffaloJack (End Obama's War On Freedom.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: yank in the UK

One thing to consider is that the size of the Federal standing army compared to the size of the population is as aout as low as it’s ever been. Active duty army is 700,000 compard to a population of over 300M? The standing army is mostly deployed overseas anyway.


18 posted on 04/03/2012 5:03:38 AM PDT by central_va ( I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yank in the UK

Some will; most won’t.


19 posted on 04/03/2012 5:20:54 AM PDT by Future Snake Eater (If we had a President, he'd look like Newt.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yank in the UK

Most miilitary ammunition will penitrate the “bullet proof” issued vest at any practical range. Only the heaviest vests with added plates will stop the stuff.
I’m not too sure of the latest steel-core stuff in 5.56mm, but it would certainly be worth a try.
It’s a good chance we might find out—soon.


20 posted on 04/03/2012 5:23:36 AM PDT by Flintlock (Picture ID for ALL voting. Let our dead rest in peace.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yank in the UK

Some will, some won’t. The feds can always hire foreign mercenaries.


21 posted on 04/03/2012 5:25:00 AM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blueplum

22 posted on 04/03/2012 5:26:14 AM PDT by tomkat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: donna
The Los Angeles (LA) riots were the most destructive civil disturbance in US history, causing the deaths of at least 54 people

Only if you know nothing of American history. The NYC draft riot was much worse, with somewhere between 120 and 2000 killed. Also much greater destruction of property, if you allow for inflation.

Then there was that little thing at the same time called the Civil War, which was quite a disturbance.

23 posted on 04/03/2012 5:33:55 AM PDT by Sherman Logan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Sherman Logan
Then there was that little thing at the same time called the Civil War, which was quite a disturbance.

Causing the deaths of at least 600,000 people.
24 posted on 04/03/2012 5:35:41 AM PDT by aruanan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: central_va
One thing to consider is that the size of the Federal standing army compared to the size of the population is as aout as low as it’s ever been.

OTOH, its firepower compared to that of the civilian population is greater than ever.

25 posted on 04/03/2012 5:35:58 AM PDT by Sherman Logan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: donna

Your story is an excellent example of the difference between police and military. Which is why you should never bring military into a law enforcement role. Only use them when it is actually necessary to suppress rebellion, etc. which is a military role. And when you do, expect them to behave as they have been trained.

OTOH, many of the police are becoming increasingly militarized, which is why we have more and more examples of police overkill.


26 posted on 04/03/2012 5:39:31 AM PDT by Sherman Logan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: aruanan

Not trying to turn this into a North vs. South thread. We’ve already got plenty of those. :)

I just find it intensely irritating that morons can pontificate about how “Today America is more divided than ever!”

Hey, a civil war with death toll that would be the equivalent today of 6M dead Americans is pretty divisive!

I guess they are so solipsistic that anything that happened before they were born just isn’t real to them.


27 posted on 04/03/2012 5:53:37 AM PDT by Sherman Logan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: BuffaloJack
The troops that fired at Kent State were not experienced combat veterans. They were just as young and just as scared as the students they faced. Had they been battlefield experienced, they’d have performed differentl

Waco, Ruby Ridge. The same boot licking is going on with the political purging of the military. The officers in charge that allow gays, restrictive ROE, and the prosecution of men in combat will gladly "follow orders".

28 posted on 04/03/2012 6:06:15 AM PDT by Dick Vomer (democrats are like flies, whatever they don't eat they sh#t on.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Dick Vomer

Well, if we all suck so bad, why don’t you join up and show us how it’s done?


29 posted on 04/03/2012 6:13:44 AM PDT by Future Snake Eater (If we had a President, he'd look like Newt.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Dick Vomer

>> The troops that fired at Kent State were not experienced combat veterans. They were just as young and just as scared as the students they faced. Had they been battlefield experienced, they’d have performed differentl
> Waco, Ruby Ridge. The same boot licking is going on with the political purging of the military. The officers in charge that allow gays, restrictive ROE, and the prosecution of men in combat will gladly “follow orders”.

Again NOT COMBAT EXPERIENCED MILITARY. Waco and Ruby Ridge were perpetrated by civilian government uniformed thugs. Think TSA, DHS, FBI, etc. types. Little training for crisis and lots of hormones and bravado. You’d never see this from a properly trained military special ops team trained for intense crisis.


30 posted on 04/03/2012 6:19:28 AM PDT by BuffaloJack (End Obama's War On Freedom.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Sherman Logan
Next November Obama loses the election to Romney. Massive rioting and murder breaks out across the country.

Not in Texas or other red states.

31 posted on 04/03/2012 6:27:23 AM PDT by Night Hides Not (My dream ticket for 2012 is John Galt & Dagny Taggart!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: moehoward

““They” certainly will. A bundle of empirical evidence to that effect.”

Yup “They” will accede to authority, every time.


32 posted on 04/03/2012 6:38:06 AM PDT by READINABLUESTATE ("We must hang together, gentlemen...else, we shall most assuredly hang separately." - Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Night Hides Not

There are no ghettos in major TX cities?


33 posted on 04/03/2012 6:44:58 AM PDT by Sherman Logan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Sherman Logan
An Army of 700,000 is not going to subdue a population of 300,000,000. Ever, unless nukes are used....

The closest thing in history is Julius Caesars conquest of Gaul (France). Caesars Armies were greatly(overwhelmingly) outnumbered but still won.

34 posted on 04/03/2012 7:18:37 AM PDT by central_va ( I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: tomkat

You got that picture just about right. Trying to put UN troops in the US would be like pouring gas on a fire. The US is not the Sudan or some other third world hellhole. I’d be suprised if any country would be eager to send their troops over here to be shot at by every citizen who has an assault weapon and is seeing red when they see a blue helmet.

As for the US troops I believe most of them would not turn on their own people. They are not raised for that.

Finally the US cannot even control the primitives in Afghanistan. What do you think the highly educated americans with sophisticated weapons will do to them on the streets of the US?


35 posted on 04/03/2012 7:19:27 AM PDT by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: central_va
I will agree, if you add one word to your claim.

An Army of 700,000 is not going to subdue a united population of 300,000,000.

Since roughly half of that 300M is on the "other side," and a very large percentage, possibly a majority, of those "on our side" will go along to get along, the force comparison changes pretty dramatically.

36 posted on 04/03/2012 7:24:59 AM PDT by Sherman Logan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: central_va
The closest thing in history is Julius Caesars conquest of Gaul (France). Caesars Armies were greatly(overwhelmingly) outnumbered but still won.

Not even close.

The conquistadors of Mexico and Peru were outnumbered to a much greater extent than JC ever was.

Admittedly, their conquests were facilitated greatly by native rivalries, epidemic disease and resultant social collapse. But we're still talking utterly ridiculous disproportions in manpower.

The British conquered India with forces much less than a ratio of 700,000 to 300M.

37 posted on 04/03/2012 7:37:00 AM PDT by Sherman Logan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: autumnraine; mnehring; COUNTrecount; Nowhere Man; FightThePower!; C. Edmund Wright; jacob allen; ...

Nut-job Conspiracy Theory Ping!

To get onto The Nut-job Conspiracy Theory Ping List you need to threaten to report me to the Admin if I don’t add you to the list...

38 posted on 04/03/2012 8:08:07 AM PDT by null and void (Day 1169 of America's ObamaVacation from reality [Heroes aren't made, Frank, they're cornered...])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Georgia Girl 2

They’ll get me sooner/later, but if/when SHTF it’s my solemn intention to take out as many of the bastards as possible beforehand.


39 posted on 04/03/2012 8:13:58 AM PDT by tomkat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Sherman Logan
Admittedly, their conquests were facilitated greatly by native rivalries,

Good thing Americans are all on the same page...

40 posted on 04/03/2012 8:13:58 AM PDT by null and void (Day 1169 of America's ObamaVacation from reality [Heroes aren't made, Frank, they're cornered...])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Sherman Logan

“United”

Exactly. Clearly half this nation are liberals and at least half of the so-called conservatives would do as their “authorities” ask. Toss in a military beholden to liberals ways of homos and they believe they have the upper hand.


41 posted on 04/03/2012 8:28:42 AM PDT by CodeToad (I'm so right-wing if I lifted my left leg I'd go into a spin.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: null and void

Sure is.


42 posted on 04/03/2012 8:45:02 AM PDT by Sherman Logan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: null and void

That’s Kent state and not a good example of troops firing on civilians. Those National Guard troops were provoked and were in fear for their lives.


43 posted on 04/03/2012 8:47:32 AM PDT by unkus (Silence Is Consent)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: unkus
Do you think it will start with our best trained and combat hardened troops?
44 posted on 04/03/2012 8:49:57 AM PDT by null and void (Day 1169 of America's ObamaVacation from reality [Heroes aren't made, Frank, they're cornered...])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: donmeaker
I do have some brass and lead. I don’t expect they will want that.

They do want it and will take it but not in the way you'd give it.

45 posted on 04/03/2012 9:15:28 AM PDT by bgill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Sherman Logan; central_va

And much of the civilian population is scared of guns. I’ve read other sites where they’ve said they’d rather die than have anything to do with them even in a hit the fan situation.


46 posted on 04/03/2012 9:21:58 AM PDT by bgill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Salamander
You don't know what's going on inside of me. You don't wanna know what's running through my mind.
Ain't that the truth!

That's why it's better left unsaid, isn't it.

47 posted on 04/03/2012 9:23:27 AM PDT by philman_36 (Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty, and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Sherman Logan
There are no ghettos in major TX cities?

There are true ghettos and the ghetto mentality in Dallas, Ft. Worth, Houston, El Paso, Austin, McAllen, Brownsville, Galveston, Killeen and you'd find many anywhere east of I35. There was the "white flight" out of Dallas in the '70s. There are those generation after generation welfare recipients who haven't been off Galveston Island their entire lives.

48 posted on 04/03/2012 9:31:57 AM PDT by bgill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Georgia Girl 2
"You cannot invade the mainland United States. There would be a rifle behind every blade of grass."

is a quote by Isoroku Yamamoto, Commander-in-Chief of the Imperial Japanese Navy during World War II. Of course it was originally stated in Japanese, this is the English translation.

49 posted on 04/03/2012 9:54:07 AM PDT by central_va ( I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: yank in the UK

1999 all over again, Michael Rivero, is that you?


50 posted on 04/03/2012 1:56:29 PM PDT by Hot Tabasco (No matter what you post here, someone's going to get pissed off......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-69 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson