Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Three Beach teens busted for allegedly making porn video on playground
WTKR NewsChannel3 ^ | 4/4/2012 | WTKR

Posted on 04/04/2012 5:57:21 PM PDT by wolfman23601

Police say three teens were arrested for shooting a raunchy video on the playground.

On any given day at Rosemont Forest Park in Virginia Beach, children are all around playing after school.

But last week, a few Salem High students found the opportunity to stage a porn shoot in broad daylight.

Police say a 15-year-old girl performed oral sex on a 16-year-old boy somewhere in the park. It was all captured by another 17-year-old boy on his cell phone.

Neighbors who live nearby wonder how this was all even possible.

“I’m quite disturbed because there are younger children that play in the park, and if I would want to go into the park in the evening, I wouldn’t want to see what’s going on,” says a resident in the area.

No one caught them in the act, but police say one of the teens was overheard talking about the cell phone video at school.

It got back to Salem High's principal who then called the cops.

Filming pornography could get these teens in serious trouble for the rest of their lives if they are convicted.

They have been charged with cultivating, manufacturing and publishing pornography.

It's considered a sexually violent offense because minors were filmed.

Despite the fact that the teens who shot the video were minors and they willingly participated in taping the encounter, Virginia law would still give a judge the power to label them as sex offenders and force them onto the state's registry.


TOPICS: Chit/Chat; Outdoors; Society
KEYWORDS: morality
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-54 next last

1 posted on 04/04/2012 5:57:35 PM PDT by wolfman23601
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: wolfman23601

STUPID STUPID and STUPID


2 posted on 04/04/2012 6:04:23 PM PDT by dayglored (Listen, strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wolfman23601

Well, what can you expect? You teach kids how to have every kind of sex imaginable from the moment they walk into a public school, then feign how shocked we are when they are having sex at school!


3 posted on 04/04/2012 6:05:54 PM PDT by Dogbert41 ("...or by Jerusalem, for it is the city of the Great King. " -Jesus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wolfman23601

Aside from the disturbing nature of the article....I’m a little confused why they would labeled sex offenders...since all are under age and it seems consensual....being no adult forced them to committ lewd acts in public....

I would bet there are several hundred thousand teenage cell phones with sexual content as bad or worse on them.....

All ofthem are now sex offenders...??

I’m not condoning their behavior but let’s not made every horny teenager a sex offender when there are real and very dangerous sex offenders living in every neighborhood ....


4 posted on 04/04/2012 6:13:34 PM PDT by Popman (America is squandering its wealth on riotous living, war, and welfare.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wolfman23601
... and if I would want to go into the park in the evening, I wouldn’t want to see what’s going on.

You're right - you probably wouldn't.

5 posted on 04/04/2012 6:18:42 PM PDT by Tax-chick (Read "Radical Son" by David Horowitz to understand the Left.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Popman

I agree with that point about the sex offender, but these kids are sinking quite low. The feminist movement is doing wonders for these girls self-worth. I can’t imagine a 15 year old consenting to this in my day and I’m not even that old.


6 posted on 04/04/2012 6:19:31 PM PDT by wolfman23601
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Popman

If they were over 21 and filming themselves engaging in sex acts during the day in a public park frequented by children, would that still be okay? What about if they were over 31? 51?


7 posted on 04/04/2012 6:22:17 PM PDT by Tax-chick (Read "Radical Son" by David Horowitz to understand the Left.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Tax-chick
What about if they were over 51?

Let's not go any further in that direction, mmmkay? I'm fresh out of mind's eye wash. ;^)

8 posted on 04/04/2012 6:27:23 PM PDT by TigersEye (Life is about choices. Your choices. Make good ones.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Popman

Because they performed the sex in public were others could witness. Age has nothing to do with it.


9 posted on 04/04/2012 6:28:46 PM PDT by Randy Larsen (No Romney or Santorum vote from my family!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: wolfman23601
...what "Is" is...They did NOT have sexual relations... according to the expert legal analysis and statement of a former law professor!


10 posted on 04/04/2012 6:30:13 PM PDT by WVKayaker (The GOP needs to live the planks of its platform, not just offer lip service. -Sarah Palin 8/2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye
I'm fresh out of mind's eye wash.

My local Walmart sells it in a convenient 5-liter box for $13.97 ... white, pink, and red!

11 posted on 04/04/2012 6:30:36 PM PDT by Tax-chick (Read "Radical Son" by David Horowitz to understand the Left.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Tax-chick

Please kindly point out where I stated it was “OK” what they did...?

The part about not condoning their behavior was in my post or is your knee jerk acting up ?


12 posted on 04/04/2012 6:33:12 PM PDT by Popman (America is squandering its wealth on riotous living, war, and welfare.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: wolfman23601

What ever happened to oral sex NOT being sex?? I thought thats what the Bent One’s “presidency” was all about.

Well in any case I sure hope they used the government supplied condoms.


13 posted on 04/04/2012 6:34:44 PM PDT by Delta 21 (Oh Crap !! Did I say that out loud ??!??)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tax-chick

My GF gets hers at WalMart at $8.97 for Crisp White. Its not bad, either.


14 posted on 04/04/2012 6:40:07 PM PDT by waterhill (I Shall Remain. FUBO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Tax-chick
Sauvignon?

A liter or two of that mind's eye wash and I'll be making movies in the park. lol

15 posted on 04/04/2012 6:43:23 PM PDT by TigersEye (Life is about choices. Your choices. Make good ones.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Randy Larsen

-——Because they performed the sex in public were others could witness. Age has nothing to do with it.-——

Point taken-——but being labeled a “sex offender “ at one time actually meant something....as in you were a deviant and needed to be watched for the protection of society

Not to be crude but if they didn’t record the act of the felletio and nobody saw them would they just be a bunch of stupid immoral horny teenagers and not sex offenders.....


16 posted on 04/04/2012 6:44:12 PM PDT by Popman (America is squandering its wealth on riotous living, war, and welfare.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: wolfman23601

Clinton legacy.


17 posted on 04/04/2012 6:46:56 PM PDT by BenLurkin (This is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire; or both)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Popman

Thousands of young men have been labeled sex offenders by the courts for having consensual sex with minors who they thought were of age. It takes years and thousands of dollars to get off the registry, if they ever can, and they can’t legally use the internet, must inform every potential employer of their status and can never be alone with a juvenile. Even their own siblings.


18 posted on 04/04/2012 6:48:16 PM PDT by TigersEye (Life is about choices. Your choices. Make good ones.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: wolfman23601
Sex education /sarc. The...new morality.
19 posted on 04/04/2012 6:54:33 PM PDT by Stepan12
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye

Yup....exactly my point....

These kids were stupid and in need of some serious adult supervision especially the girl who for some reason allowed herself to have such a low opinion of herself she would do what she did

But to label these kids sex offenders is going to harm them for life for something they did when they were years away from being an adult....


20 posted on 04/04/2012 6:57:31 PM PDT by Popman (America is squandering its wealth on riotous living, war, and welfare.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: wolfman23601

Our children follow the example we as a culture set.

Ping the pro-porn contingent.


21 posted on 04/04/2012 7:14:54 PM PDT by Persevero (Homeschooling for Excellence since 1992)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Popman
It does harm them for life and essentially puts them on state welfare if their parents (or someone) won't support them. I know of one case like this through a friend and the 15 yr old girl looked much older and convinced the dumb guy she was of age. He is now almost 30 has never had a job, never had a driver's license and is still on probation. He could have gotten out of the program years ago ... if only he had about $40k to grease the legal wheels.

It's just another way for the Progessives to create more dependents on the state.

22 posted on 04/04/2012 7:16:18 PM PDT by TigersEye (Life is about choices. Your choices. Make good ones.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Popman

It’s a terrible misuse of the whole concept of “sex offender”. The sex offender registry should only be about predators, not some kids out being stupid.

The sex offender registry itself has enough problems. There is something wrong when dangerous predators have to be released from custody... And everybody knows they’re still dangerous but the law has no mechanism to cope with them. People known to still be dangerous shouldn’t be let out into the world. We just don’t yet know how to deal with them. They can’t be fixed. But we can’t make sex offenses capital crimes either— because if we did then there’s no reason for them to ever leave another victim alive.

I don’t know the answer.


23 posted on 04/04/2012 7:19:37 PM PDT by Ramius (Personally, I give us one chance in three. More tea anyone?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: wolfman23601

And it will be on the internet forever! 10 - 20 years down the road ... “Mom, I saw one of your movies at school today. One of the boys was showing it around.”


24 posted on 04/04/2012 7:20:54 PM PDT by RetiredTexasVet (There's a pill for just about everything ... except stupid!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye
The problem in this case, and your story, is the key element is an underage girl (15) wanting to have sex ~

Sure, they'll do it ~ for the attention, attentiveness, social status (in some subgroups), and maybe for money ~ but sex for the sole purpose of sex?

Talk to them someday.

Now about Virginia's laws, they all end up as sex offenders. They can, of course, move somewhere else.

25 posted on 04/04/2012 7:22:25 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah
The young man I was speaking of is in NJ. He can't move to another state unless the sheriff's dept of the county he plans to move to signs a waiver. His family wanted to move to PA. Can't do it. Due to the nature of national data bases today you just can't sneak off to a new state and start over. This ain't the '60s anymore.

The problem in this case, and your story, is the key element is an underage girl (15) wanting to have sex ~

Is that something new?

26 posted on 04/04/2012 7:26:27 PM PDT by TigersEye (Life is about choices. Your choices. Make good ones.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye
It's never been"new" ~ which is why you have to protect yourself ~ certainly don't get 'em pregnant, and don't get caught on the premises, and most of all, don't get filmed with them!

Seem's easy enough to me.

27 posted on 04/04/2012 7:29:47 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Popman

Not likely in today’s courts. If caught urinating in public, they will still have to register as a sex offender.

Just the way things are.


28 posted on 04/04/2012 7:33:54 PM PDT by Randy Larsen (No Romney or Santorum vote from my family!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

The point here is that registries of sexual offenders is new.


29 posted on 04/04/2012 7:36:28 PM PDT by TigersEye (Life is about choices. Your choices. Make good ones.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye; Popman
I know of one case like this through a friend and the 15 yr old girl looked much older and convinced the dumb guy she was of age.

What sort of 15 year old girl is hanging around with a 21+ guy trying to convince him she's of legal age?

I'll tell you what kind.

It's a girl who has been given no supervision, no training, and no sense of self-worth by her parents.

30 posted on 04/04/2012 7:38:04 PM PDT by thecodont
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye

PUBLIC REGISTRIES are new.


31 posted on 04/04/2012 7:40:08 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: thecodont

He was 18. What difference does it make what kind of girl she was? Do you imagine a Utopia where there are no girls like that? The point is his whole life has been ruined by the state.


32 posted on 04/04/2012 7:42:21 PM PDT by TigersEye (Life is about choices. Your choices. Make good ones.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: thecodont; TigersEye; Popman
Not to sound too strident but it's within living memory that Virginia's age of consent was 14, but if you had authority over the girl (as a teacher or guardian) It was 15!

The big point here is that Virginia law changed with the times even if idiocy didn't.

33 posted on 04/04/2012 7:43:09 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

No kidding. That’s what I said.


34 posted on 04/04/2012 7:43:09 PM PDT by TigersEye (Life is about choices. Your choices. Make good ones.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye

PUBLIC ~ cops always had their lists ~ this stuff about minors used to be kept “confidential” which meant nobody outside the law enforcement organizations would know. Now the lists get published. Probably one reason for laws to establish who gets listed for what and how that is distributed.


35 posted on 04/04/2012 7:46:58 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

I don’t have any idea what your point is. Sex offender registries are new. That has nothing to do with any “secret” lists you imagine the police used to keep.


36 posted on 04/04/2012 7:49:24 PM PDT by TigersEye (Life is about choices. Your choices. Make good ones.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

You make a great point! Every part of society will soon be catagorized into little segments being dealt with by some nameless gov. flunky who has decided they don’t fit into his little square box of acceptable morality.

The dems are doing it now and blaming the spineless gop.


37 posted on 04/04/2012 7:49:36 PM PDT by Randy Larsen (No Romney or Santorum vote from my family!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye
Every police force had a local list of known sex offenders. Remember, your 12 year old rapists soon grow up to be 21 year old rapists. Look up the name MONTY RISSELL someday. He was known to the law since childhood. When he became an adult the neighbor ladies he murdered had no idea of his extensive record.

There are a number of these characters around and that's part of the purpose for PUBLIC lists.

38 posted on 04/04/2012 7:53:19 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

A police record on an underage rapist is one thing. A list of guys who had underage girlfriends is another thing. I doubt the cops ever kept a list of them.


39 posted on 04/04/2012 7:55:53 PM PDT by TigersEye (Life is about choices. Your choices. Make good ones.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye
I'm sure the Indianapolis police did ~ they had a large number of beer joints and quite underage B-girls. There was a constant battle against the practice ever since before PROHIBITION to the 1980s.

I doubt other large cities were different.

Minneapolis became well known for its teenybopper runaways. The cops wanted to know the perps and the victims~so you know they had their lists based on arrests, investigations and prosecutions.

They simply didn't make that information public.

40 posted on 04/04/2012 8:06:56 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: WVKayaker

WVKayaker has the winning post!


41 posted on 04/04/2012 8:23:34 PM PDT by GladesGuru (In a society predicated upon freedom, it is necessary to examine principles."...the public interest)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Popman

“Not to be crude but if they didn’t record the act of the felletio and nobody saw them would they just be a bunch of stupid immoral horny teenagers and not sex offenders.....”

Actually, they would not be providing make-work for a slew (slough?) of government employees.

Trough feeders have to eat too - or must they?


42 posted on 04/04/2012 8:26:27 PM PDT by GladesGuru (In a society predicated upon freedom, it is necessary to examine principles."...the public interest)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: WVKayaker

“...what “Is” is...They did NOT have sexual relations... according to the expert legal analysis and statement of a former law professor!”

Well, you just KNEW that this day was coming, back in the late 1990’s. I certainly did.

I’m wondering...has anyone successfully used that as a defense?


43 posted on 04/04/2012 8:30:08 PM PDT by The Antiyuppie ("When small men cast long shadows, then it is very late in the day.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye

“A police record on an underage rapist is one thing. A list of guys who had underage girlfriends is another thing. I doubt the cops ever kept a list of them.”

So - you actually believe the cops don’t have an unofficial list of local sluts and whores available to the BoyzNBlu?


44 posted on 04/04/2012 8:32:43 PM PDT by GladesGuru (In a society predicated upon freedom, it is necessary to examine principles."...the public interest)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

Who said anything about runaways?


45 posted on 04/04/2012 8:37:17 PM PDT by TigersEye (Life is about choices. Your choices. Make good ones.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Popman

You said they shouldn’t be considered sex offenders because of their age. I was wondering if the same behavior would become an “offense” if they were older, or if you just didn’t think public oral sex in the daytime near children’s playgrounds was an offense, at all.


46 posted on 04/04/2012 8:39:05 PM PDT by Tax-chick (Read "Radical Son" by David Horowitz to understand the Left.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: GladesGuru

I said a list of guys...


47 posted on 04/04/2012 8:40:12 PM PDT by TigersEye (Life is about choices. Your choices. Make good ones.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye

“I said a list of guys...”

You implyin’ those cops are queer?

;-)


48 posted on 04/04/2012 8:43:24 PM PDT by GladesGuru (In a society predicated upon freedom, it is necessary to examine principles."...the public interest)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: GladesGuru

Amazingly anywhere you have a serial killer loose and he starts murdering prostitutes the police always seem to know all about those girls aforehand!


49 posted on 04/05/2012 6:13:07 AM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Dogbert41

-—Well, what can you expect? You teach kids how to have every kind of sex imaginable from the moment they walk into a public school, then feign how shocked we are when they are having sex at school——

Millstones. Neck. Sea.


50 posted on 04/05/2012 6:22:13 AM PDT by St_Thomas_Aquinas (Viva Christo Rey!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-54 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson