Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.


Posted on 04/09/2012 2:31:38 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach

China will accelerate the use of new-energy sources such as nuclear energy and put an end to blind expansion in industries such as solar energy and wind power in 2012, Chinese Premier Wen Jiabao says in a government report published on March 5.

China will instead develop nuclear power in 2012, actively develop hydroelectric power, tackle key problems more quickly in the exploration and development of shale gas, and increase the share of new energy and renewable energy in total energy consumption.

The guidance indicates a new trend for new-energy and renewable energy development in China from 2012. Analysts believe that the development of the solar and wind power industries will stabilize while hydropower will have the top priority in renewable energy development in China.

-- Hydropower to contribute two-thirds of renewable energy

According to China's development plan for 2011-2015, China aims to increase the share of renewable energy consumption to 11.4 per cent of total energy consumption in China by the end of 2015.

As solar power and wind power development may slow down by government measures to curb blind expansion, hydropower is expected to play a more important role in fulfilling the renewable energy consumption target and contribute two-thirds to the target.

The National Energy Administration (NEA) plans to add 20 GW of hydropower installed capacity, up 57 per cent year on year, which marks the biggest increase in recent years.

Based on the average cost of 6,870 yuan/kW during 2006-2010, the planned 20 GW hydropower installed capacity will require an investment of 137.4 billion yuan (US$21.7 billion).

Besides these developments, the government report emphasizes accelerating the establishment of mechanisms that promote the use of new-energy sources. It also lays down the need to strengthen overall planning, promote auxiliary projects, strengthen policy guidance, and expand domestic demand. This means China will pay more attention to the utilization of new energy, hence wind power and solar power, which failed to achieve sound utilization, will bid farewell to the era of fast development, said Zhai Ruoyu, former general manager of the China Datang Corp., one of China's five power giants.

-- Share of non-fossil energy use in China drops in 2011

The share of non-fossil energy consumption, including hydropower, nuclear power, wind power and solar power, in total primary energy use in China witnessed a decline of 0.3 percentage point from 8.6 per cent in 2010 to 8.3 per cent in 2011, says Qian Zhimin, deputy director with the NEA.

According to a report from the China Electricity Council on the performance of China's power industry in 2011, the average operating hours of hydropower generating facilities decreased 376 hours to 3,028 hours in 2011 due to severe drought, the lowest level of the past 20 years.

Meanwhile, the operating hours of wind power generating units plunged by 144 hours in 2011 despite an increase of 48.16 per cent in on-grid wind power output.

The operating hours of solar power generating units also declined in spite of the tripling of installed capacity of solar PV power.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Conspiracy; Science; Weather
KEYWORDS: china; climatechange; climategate; climategate2; energy; globalwarming; globalwarminghoax; nuclearpower; solarpower
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-44 last
To: Sequoyah101

Learn how read, thorium reactors are not cost effective or else there would be hundreds of them up and running already.

41 posted on 04/10/2012 12:42:28 AM PDT by Razzz42
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Spaulding

I can see why you are delusional, you are fundamentally flawed.

Fukushima (was the 10th largest nuclear power plant site in the world) was well on its way into meltdown mode before the tsunami struck, the site was shaken apart by the great quake and cooling water no longer available to the (3) units that were melting down because the great quake ruptured the plumbing. The other (3) out of a total of (6) were in various stages of maintenance and not operating but the spent fuel ponds were in jeopardy as they lacked cooling water circulation example, Unit 4.

Where is the containment when there is a no go zone and nuclear fallout readings from Fukushima’s explosions throughout the world?...Stop kidding yourself. Maybe concentrate on natural gas, nuclear is a lost cause.

42 posted on 04/10/2012 1:09:06 AM PDT by Razzz42
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Solar Power, Wind Power all bull excrement,

The Chinese have figured out those pie in the sky greenie weenie wet dreams force them to double up on peaking assets to meet peak day demands. Very expensive.

Unfortunately for us, Dummcrats and President DumbA$$ (aka America's President Mugabe) don't understand that.

43 posted on 04/10/2012 1:16:16 AM PDT by Chgogal (WSJ, Coulter, Kristol, Krauthammer, Rove et al., STFU. Thank you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NVDave
"It bears notice what you said about the senior party officials in China - that they tend to have a much higher representation of technical people in their ranks."

I agree Dave. China was never going to deploy solar energy as a replacement for nuclear. There is so much propaganda floating about truth supported by verifiable facts is becoming more and more important. Someone must see this so-called report as having a political purpose. It just isn't clear what that purpose is.

There never was any potential for solar or wind to replace nuclear, coal, or petroleum generation. The limit, which can never be overcome, is because solar energy is so diffuse. At sea level a best case, high noon measurement might show 600 Watts/square meter incident. getting ten percent of that is reasonable, 60 watts. Then divide by four, since average usable sunlight is available for about 6 of 24 hours. 15 watts per square meter over 24 hours is a joke, but one which few in the lay public understand. You can bet that John Holdren does; his objective is to reduce our consumption, and destroy free markets so that the smart people can tell us what we really need.

44 posted on 04/10/2012 1:20:12 AM PDT by Spaulding
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-44 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794 is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson