Skip to comments.THE UNDOCUMENTED WORKER IN THE OVAL OFFICE
Posted on 04/22/2012 1:38:48 AM PDT by YosemitestEdited on 04/22/2012 5:23:44 AM PDT by Admin Moderator. [history]
The following is an excerpt from Where's the Birth Certificate?: The Case that Barack Obama is not Eligible to be President.
It's the "Introduction" from Pages xi thru xxiii .
Who is Barack Obama, and why is the American public forbidden from examining key documentation from his past?
Done; saved as *.HTM, *.HTML & *.TXT to HD.
Ping to this thread. Save it to your HD, ASAP!
We already know most all of this. Begging Rush to comment on this is like putting a price on his head, and you’ve seen what happened when he called the slut a ‘slut’. We already have evidence of Obama presenting a forged copy of his birth documents on the internet for public perusal, which isn’t even a crime because neither Obama or the one that published it was under oath at any time.
If you’ve kept up with what just happened in the New Jersey Apuzzo, et al eligibility suit regarding Obama’s eligibility to be on the ballot, Alexandra Hill presented no evidence, other than objections. She stated that the birth certificates on the internet being produced for evidence were neither certified or original documents and had no relevance to the case, because NJ did not require such proof and they were never presented as proof of eligibility. And the judge accepted that load of manure. At one point she argued that his ‘popularity’ and the signatures of NJ citizens was all the filing documents required by the State of NJ for Obama to be eligible.
Nevertheless, what state has required documented ‘proof’ ever. All they require is a written statement from the DNC, that he is their nominated candidate and IS ELIGIBLE to hold the office and petitions signed by the citizens to put him on the ballot.
As I see it, the ONLY one that can be held accountable is the DNC chairman, Nancy Pelosi, who offered the document stating that he is eligible in a sworn and signed document. And that SHE must be held accountable for the evidence she received to make such a statement to the states which is all that the states require. The problem is 1) at the state level, the the acceptance of such evidence needs to be changed to require such ‘proof’ that he is eligible. And the DNC is fighting that change in every state. And even if it is put in place, it will not affect the election of Barack Hussein Obama Soetoro, one whit, unless it is made retroactive. Fat chance of that happening at this point. 2) even though we’re all 99% sure by a preponderance of the evidence gathered that Obama is most likely an illegal alien in this country, and at best a naturalized citizen, and is not eligible to hold office the election process is flawed and the Obama machine knew it. And even though he has put up two forged documents, and we know somebody forged his Selective Service document have any of those documents been presented while he was under oath, which would make it a crime?
When the US Senate met and confirmed the electoral ‘vote’ making him president, was there a crime there? If you will remember every Senator threw down a vote without raising one question, even though they received the many letters from their constituents begging them to investigate and object and ask for proof of his eligibility. They didn’t. I gathered, from asking on several internet sites for people to send me copies of their letters to only one of my senators begging him to object, over 150 copies of such letters mailed to him. I sent them to him and asked him and asked him for a count of how many of those letters he actually received, and why he was negligent in his duty to raise a hue and cry on our behalf. He wrote me back stating that he was not ‘required’ or paid by the citizens to spend his time providing me with that information, and that a question regarding such ‘negligence’ needed to be delivered to the Senate Ethics Committee. What? Like I have the ability to access the Senate Ethics Committee? I don’t really know whether I do or not, but I don’t think so. I suspect that access to the Senate Ethics Committee is restricted to ‘proven’ punitive damage or acts of moral turpitude which is the only way in my state that you can file a complaint against a lawyer. It’s most likely the same legal game. My determination flailed at that point in the face of such arrogance.
To sum it up, I really admire those that are pursuing upholding Constitutional eligibility for their courage and determination and their gift to us of their time and the truth that is being uncoverred. But again, as I see it, the only way that we are going to effect change is to change the states’ ballot process requiring the parties to present documented proof of eligibility. And we are screwed because Obama is sitting in the White House and the damage is done. Our only recourse at this time is to rouse the citizens to wake up and vote him out and not allow the sociopath another four years of insanity wreaked upon the heads of Americans by a foreign born anti-American mired in communism.
I loved the statement by somebody that “Uncle Ted” wields the truth like a deadly weapon...we’ve seen the attempt at intimidation of both Ted and Rush who are both strong voices of truth. I can only wish that I had such strength. Go Newt...don’t ever give up. Still praying for that miracle.
MAJOR PING TO THE RIST!
“Clearly a fake, and pretty poorly done”.
Why? Because Romney is also ineligible.
Chihuahua Romney - the One and the Only "Magic RINO(TM)":
It has nothing to do with scrubbing and everything to do with the fact that you just posted a ton of copyrighted material on FR. WND has asked to to ensure their articles are excerpted. You just posted an entire chapter of a book published by them.
Why some journalist doesn’t run with this is beyond comprehension.
If I excerpt this, it will just be leaving the first 5-6 paragraphs remaining. If you excerpt it, you can chose the best 5-6 paragraphs to leave in place or even mix-and match key bullet point sentences. Your comment 1 will remain untouched. If you want to chose how this is excerpted, please acknowledge, post it as a comment and I will move that into the body of the post once you have posted it as a comment.
Thanks, this is not a conspiracy, just adherence to past WND copyright requests.
There is no doubt in my mind that people who know this haven't the courage to expose it and that even the US Supreme Court is involved in the scam to keep it hidden, since they will not allow the evidence to be presented.
Frightened of the Civil disturbance that will erupt at the removal of this fraud. The Civil disturbance threat by the same people who now threaten that civil disturbance if a man is not tried and convicted in Florida.
There is no doubt in my mind that he is about to get away with it again, and if we do not get together and vote him out he will be back for another 4 years of utter destruction.
With a political and Judicial curtain of silence on Obama there is no other way to rid ourselves of this menace to Americans other than the vote.With the accounting of the vote by a foreign agent, even that may not be enough. Fear of Civil disturbance is no excuse to stick your head in the sand and refuse to see what is before you.
Neither does the entire House of Representatives, Senate, Malkin, Hannity, Levin, Cavuto, Stoesel, Michael Medved, Laura Ingraham, Neal Boortz, Michael Savage, Bill O'Reilly, etc. It's as if everybody mentioned above was threatened to be killed or have their families killed.
Total abject silence from EVERYBODY on the right.EVERYBODY
Yes, Candor7, it is a MAJOR ping and one that will take me the rest of the week to read.
Thanks for the ping and a thank you to Yosemitest for the thread.
Well, it’s been an hour and no response. I have excerpted it to just the first couple of paragraphs and the links.
“Rush Limbaugh, as much as we all admire him (most of us anyway) simply DOES NOT HAVE THE CAJONES to pursue this.”
Maybe it’s a behind-the-scenes project of his. I don’t think all of what Rush does is accessible by tuning in to the EIB.
I would like nothing more than to discover that Rush had been running the equivalent of a Sheriff Joe investigation himself.
I haven’t heard him mention having to attend a “secret meeting” lately...It’s fun to speculate!
100% correct, Y! Georgie Sore-ass is pulling the strings.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.