Skip to comments.Hawaii's 'VERIFICATION OF BIRTH' Document Raises Suspicion!
Posted on 05/25/2012 12:09:02 PM PDT by GeorgeWashingtonsGhost
Here's the official 'Verification of Birth' document submitted by Hawaii's Department of Health to the State of Arizona in response to SoS Ken Bennett's request for verification of Obama's birth, allegedly in Hawaii.
Note that Obama's alleged DAY OF BIRTH IS OMITTED from the listed items. Shouldn't the DAY of Obama's birth be present in this document?
Now, if Obama can be proven to not have been born in Hawaii, it would seem Alvin T. Onaka Ph.D. would have some 'splaining to do.. Unlike the 'official' birth certificate released by the White House, at least there's no 'smiley face' drawn into the "A" in Alvin's name.
Seems we still do not have the long form, nor do we have any discussion of Obama not being eligible to be President due to the fact his father was not a U.S. citizen at the time of Barack's birth (not a 'Natural Born Citizen').
This is a blog, right?
I’m not knocking it, just asking.
Am I correct that the AZ SOS was seeking documentation, or verification of such, that would entitle Obama to appear on the AZ ballot, yet the issue he pursued was ONLY Obama’s birth in Hawaii and NOT the one of his being a natural born citizen or not?
It’s a pretty left-wing source.
He’s the messiah and messiahs are not born. They are immaculated!
Doesn’t this come back to the difference between a “Certificate of Live Birth”, and a “Birth Certificate”. It seems probable that Obama was born* — and that’s all a COLB verifies.
(* You could make arguments for “hatched”, “cloned”, “stitched together and zapped by lightening”, or any number of alternatives to “born” — but, that is another discussion.)
It was the only place I could find the actual document other than the DUmmies site which I did not want to link to. I don’t know why Bennett backed down on this issue. Perhaps the document helps Arpaio and his investigation, if you know what I mean.
“yet the issue he pursued was ONLY Obamas birth in Hawaii”
The only issue that the Hawaii Department of Health is qualified to address is what their records contain regarding Obama’s birth. A State registrar is in no position to address natural born citizen status with regard to parent’s citizenship etc.
Add “immaculated” to my list of alternatives in # 6.
I guess Messiahs don’t have A DAY OF BIRTH?? This omission from this document screams so loud I’m practically deaf.
But I’m talking about what the SOS of AZ was using as the standard for what would qualify Obama for their ballot, and asking, was he ONLY seeking verification for O’s birth in Hawaii, and if he got that, or what he believes is that, then he’s fine with O on the ballot?
If anything I asked was construed as suggesting Hawaii could address the natural born issue, that wasn’t my intention.
This is what convinced Arizona’s Sec. of State? So called original birth certificates didn’t work, but a letter from Onaki does? LOL
The Announcements sidebar is reserved for FR business and the Frontpage sidebar is reserved for news items that are truly Front Page news. Not this.
At the bottom of the document, it does give dates for the mother’s signature and the attendant’s signature.
Those are in early August of 1961.
The document does claim that the state of Hawaii has on record a birth certificate that Obama was born there. It doesn’t claim that this is that document, simply that they have one they purport shows that.
What about the name of the doc that delivered him? Does anyone know his name?
Apparently you cannot have access to Obama’s original birth certificate.
If so, then it’s either this, or nothing.
What a conundrum. At this point lets just kick his ash out come November and send the Kenyan fraud packing off to Hawaii, Chicago or back to Africa.
Don’t fall for this...TPM is a far-left website which is using sarcasm to try and suck us into this. Don’t take the bait.