Skip to comments.Fox News Reporter on Fox News Report Just Made a, Shall We Say, Slip of the Tongue?
Posted on 05/28/2012 4:15:58 PM PDT by murron
Reporter on Fox News Report just said that Romney has a huge lead over Obama with military veterans and that Obama has a lead over Romney with non-military veterans. What is a non-military veteran?
” - - - a non-military veteran” is a member of the Obamanation Brownshirts, the dreaded Shock Troops, none other than the OWS.
If it was on Special Report I just happened to be watching. I backed up my DVR and listened again. What he said was Vets and NonVets.
John Effin Kerry??
obamma holds a huge lead among members of Communist Party USA.
He has never served in our country but yet he is commander in chief..that should NOT be...
I don't know about today, but about 40 years ago, they were many of the TRAITOROUS, Bottom-Feeding, Rat-Bas-Turd, Snake, (John "F'n" Kerry's) so called "Witnesses" from which he purportedly received accounts of their having witnessed or participated in "attrocities" and/or "war crimes" while serving in Nam.....
....EXCEPT, it was later learned that MOST of those phony, lying, POS, scumbags, had either never served in Vietnam or even been in the Military.
Yeah, these DESPICABLE, Leftist Tools would support and vote for Dear Leader.
No, I did the same thing to be sure. My husband heard it too. He definitely said non-military vets. I’m talking about the reporter standing outside.
No, that’s not what he meant. The pollster said it was non-veterans, and that who was polled. It was purely a slip of the toungue.
That should read *tongue*.
Free Republic is funded solely by contributions made by liberty loving grassroots conservatives like you who enjoy and use it. We take no money from and are not beholden to outsiders or corporate string pullers or party king makers.
Beholden to no one!
That santance maikes know cents.
why the long face ?
..his comment about cooks not being military
With each of your replies I become less certain of the truth of your interpretation and more certain that either you are giving no thought to my replies or you are truly clueless.
Those would be the enemy noncombatants who have infiltrated our country.
OK. Let me try this one more time. The story that the reporter was reporting on was the same story that had been playing all day long, and that was that Romney was polling higher with veterans than Obama, and that Obama was polling higher with non-veterans. No one else threw in the word “military”. This reporter was reporting on that story. He is the only one who used the term non-military veterans. I think everyone else got what this post was about. It was meant to be humerous. Lighten up! Besides, no matter where you insist on putting the hyphen, neither one makes sense. I don’t see the difference, but I’m sure you will enlighten me.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.