Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Fossil Fuels. When are we going to stop using this false description of anaerobic oil?
General Knowledge verses historical (mis-knowledge)

Posted on 06/04/2012 10:05:51 AM PDT by jongaltsr

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-94 next last
To: thackney
Do you have proof that there are NOT any asphaltics on Titan? Or are you also relying on spectral analysis? I have no proof either way.
41 posted on 06/04/2012 3:26:52 PM PDT by JRandomFreeper (Gone Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: JRandomFreeper
Okay, you have a nice day.

Petroleum Geologists following biotic production of produce gas and oil for the industry.

Those working under Abiotic theories have scammed investors and sometimes governments out of cash and time, but no commercial oil/gas production.

You might consider why all oil/gas commercial production is sourced to sedimentary basins, and why oil/gas never is sourced to igneous rock.

42 posted on 06/04/2012 3:28:59 PM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: JRandomFreeper

http://sci.esa.int/science-e/www/object/index.cfm?fobjectid=31193

I cannot prove that no Leprechaun exist anywhere on the planet either.

Cheers.


43 posted on 06/04/2012 3:31:46 PM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: thackney
When someone uses Noah's Flood to justify a position.... I'm going to ask questions. I suspect that natural gas and oil here on this planet came from other than biological sources, even if they may be contaminated by them.

We've got plenty of time to debate it without being ugly.

/johnny

44 posted on 06/04/2012 3:32:32 PM PDT by JRandomFreeper (Gone Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: JRandomFreeper
When someone uses Noah's Flood to justify a position.

You have the wrong FReeper.

Cheers.

45 posted on 06/04/2012 3:35:31 PM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: thackney
Because carbon sequestration is limited to sedimentary rocks? And you can't make C+ anything without carbon?

/johnny

46 posted on 06/04/2012 3:37:08 PM PDT by JRandomFreeper (Gone Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: thackney
Read #31 and #32.

/johnny

47 posted on 06/04/2012 3:41:19 PM PDT by JRandomFreeper (Gone Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: thackney
And #33.

/johnny

48 posted on 06/04/2012 3:43:48 PM PDT by JRandomFreeper (Gone Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: JRandomFreeper

The aboitic claim is it is formed far deeper than the sedimentary layers.

It is just frustrating to me to see this nonsense posted over and over at Free Republic. It makes us look like fools.


49 posted on 06/04/2012 3:46:28 PM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: thackney
So complex hydrocarbons are always biotic? 'Splain me Titan.

I don't mind looking a fool, I've done that more than once. I want the truth of the matter.

/johnny

50 posted on 06/04/2012 3:52:57 PM PDT by JRandomFreeper (Gone Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Ann Archy

Actually, the planet makes oil from more than one process, but all othese processes come down to hydrocarbons. Living things are made of hydrocarbons, so when living things are broken down via pressure and temperature, wah lah, hydrocarbons for pools of oil! BActeria, which are made of hydrocarbons, eat rocks and when they in turn are broken down via heat and pressure, wah lah, more oil in the pools!


51 posted on 06/04/2012 3:54:46 PM PDT by MHGinTN (Being deceived can be cured.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: thackney

Are you familiar with Van Flandern’s exploding planet theory?


52 posted on 06/04/2012 3:57:59 PM PDT by MHGinTN (Being deceived can be cured.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: JRandomFreeper

In an environment of insufficient oxygen, Methane is the lowest energy state of carbon and hydrogen. A planet/moon forming with insufficient oxygen and sufficient hydrogen & carbon is going to form Methane. If large amounts of carbon exist rather than the 1/4 ratio to hydrogen, then some is going to form ethane. (or other similar basic ratios)

Notice all the trace amount of hydrocarbons found on Titan (as measured with their Gas Chromatograph and Mass Spectrometer)

http://sci.esa.int/science-e/www/object/index.cfm?fobjectid=31187

They are all the most basic ratios of those combinations. There is no Heptane, Heptene, Heptyne, Cycloheptane, Heptadiene, Octane, Octene, Octyne, Cyclooctane, Octadiene, Nonane, Nonene, Nonyne, Cyclononane, Nonadiene, Decane, Decene, Decyne, Cyclodecane, Decadiene and so on. In crude oil we get carbon strings hundreds of atoms long.

What was found on Titan wasn’t complex hydrocarbons, it was the most basic, simplest hydrocarbons that can exist.


53 posted on 06/04/2012 4:06:01 PM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: thackney; JRandomFreeper

I’m actually enjoying the conversation. Its a subject of some interest to me. I work in the oil world.

I’m willing to grant that crude oil is a thing unto itself, but I’m not sure that this proves or disproves anything with respect to the basic conversation. Maybe we’re talking past each other.

I look out into space and see balls of hydrogen, balls of methane and ethane (which is, in essence, balls of frozen natural gas), and balls of frozen helium, and so forth. Its hard for me to look at that and not conclude that the universe is made from hydrogen, methanes, carbon, and so forth, that the chemicals you find on earth you are going to find again and again scattered everywhere you look in outerspace.

Then you come to earth and find that biological processes give off methane (or at least I do periodically throughout the day).

I suppose thackneys’ point is that, while elemental hydrocarbons pre-exist the earth, it took biological processes or some biological input for it to take the form we see in crude oil. Am I getting that right?


54 posted on 06/04/2012 4:10:29 PM PDT by marron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: thackney
it was the most basic, simplest hydrocarbons that can exist.

What is the most basic, simplest hydrocarbon that we can detect on Titan from here?

'Splain me.

I will listen. And learn.

/johnny

55 posted on 06/04/2012 4:16:11 PM PDT by JRandomFreeper (Gone Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: marron; thackney
I’m actually enjoying the conversation.

I am, as well, and I'm glad you are, as well. Jump in when I'm being stupid.

/johnny

56 posted on 06/04/2012 4:19:16 PM PDT by JRandomFreeper (Gone Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: marron
elemental hydrocarbons pre-exist the earth

Stay with the first word, elemental, elements, atoms, not hydrocarbons.

If Carbon and Hydrogen are ejected in a big bang creation of the universe, as these hot gas combine, they are going to eventually form their lowest energy state. Without a sufficient presence of oxygen, they are going to eventually form simple hydrocarbons, like what is found on Titan.

On earth, when the organic debris remains in contact with sufficient oxygen, it eventually goes to the lowest energy state, carbon dioxide, water, sulfur dioxide, etc. When sediment at the bottom of the lake/ocean cover over and bury the organics away from a source of oxygen, we get hydrocarbons. The more thermally mature our sediment rock becomes (heat and time factors) the lighter (smaller) our hydrocarbons become. Natural Gas is found in greater percentages than oil in the more thermally mature fields.

57 posted on 06/04/2012 4:24:10 PM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: JRandomFreeper
What is the most basic, simplest hydrocarbon that we can detect on Titan from here?

We sent a Gas Chromatograph and Mass Spectrometer to Titan on the Huygens probe.

58 posted on 06/04/2012 4:26:15 PM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: thackney
You went from elemental to organic debris... Let's us look at that.

/johnny

59 posted on 06/04/2012 4:29:46 PM PDT by JRandomFreeper (Gone Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: thackney
not hydrocarbons.

If methane isn't a hydrocarbon, I'm the Queen of England.

And I'm not.

Hydrocarbons exist on Titan.

/johnny

60 posted on 06/04/2012 4:32:25 PM PDT by JRandomFreeper (Gone Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-94 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson