Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: djone
What does it say when (ahem) backward Rednecks have to lead the country out of the darkness?

Roll Tide!

2 posted on 06/07/2012 9:41:22 AM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: blam

“What does it say when (ahem) backward Rednecks have to lead the country out of the darkness?”

####

It says that the puerile, utterly ignorant attempts by the condescending Northeastern and Hollywood elites, to paint flyover, white Christians, (yes particularly in the South), as stupid, backward, superstitious bumpkins was always a lie.

But we knew that.

I have long said that the old Confederacy is what may ultimately save America.


5 posted on 06/07/2012 9:54:58 AM PDT by EyeGuy (Armed, judgmental, fiscally responsible heterosexual.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: blam

Alabama’s State Motto: We Dare Defend Our Rights”

Roll Tide


7 posted on 06/07/2012 10:01:22 AM PDT by Himyar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: blam
What does it say when (ahem) backward Rednecks have to lead the country out of the darkness?

It says that except for segregation up until the 1960s, Alabama and the other rednecks have been more right about most everything else than any other part of the US.

10 posted on 06/07/2012 10:14:11 AM PDT by Will88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: blam

Audemus Jura Nostra defendere


11 posted on 06/07/2012 10:15:20 AM PDT by Jemian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: blam

A problem arises when the goals of the Agenda 21 are the same as those who oppose it.

You may have read that the Obama administration is trying to turn the Pacific Northwest into the biggest coal exporting area in the US and it is part of the Agenda 21, building multi-modal transportation corridors through rural areas to move people and cargo between international urban areas, ports and hubs.

The idea is to ship out America’s natural resources to developing countries, where the manufacturing will take place, rather than in the US. Part of the plan is to eliminate skilled labor jobs in the US and create more unskilled jobs, subsidized by the government.

So, the opponents of the Agenda 21 say that the opposition are part of the war on coal, but in reality the Obama administration and the Democrats are subsidizing the western sub-bituminous coal, which is mined on federal leased lands. The Democrat war on coal is only against privately owned coal mines on the East Coast.

City after city on the west coast has turned down these coal terminals, so they have changed their tactics and gone for the rural areas, where there is little local government oversight capable of fighting Goldman Sachs and Warren Buffet, which are the biggest partners with the Obama administration in this scheme to ship out the sub-bituminous coal that America doesn’t want, through our beautiful rural neighborhoods.


13 posted on 06/07/2012 10:22:15 AM PDT by Eva
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: blam

A problem arises when the goals of the Agenda 21 are the same as those who oppose it.

You may have read that the Obama administration is trying to turn the Pacific Northwest into the biggest coal exporting area in the US and it is part of the Agenda 21, building multi-modal transportation corridors through rural areas to move people and cargo between international urban areas, ports and hubs.

The idea is to ship out America’s natural resources to developing countries, where the manufacturing will take place, rather than in the US. Part of the plan is to eliminate skilled labor jobs in the US and create more unskilled jobs, subsidized by the government.

So, the opponents of the Agenda 21 say that the opposition are part of the war on coal, but in reality the Obama administration and the Democrats are subsidizing the western sub-bituminous coal, which is mined on federal leased lands. The Democrat war on coal is only against privately owned coal mines on the East Coast.

City after city on the west coast has turned down these coal terminals, so they have changed their tactics and gone for the rural areas, where there is little local government oversight capable of fighting Goldman Sachs and Warren Buffet, which are the biggest partners with the Obama administration in this scheme to ship out the sub-bituminous coal that America doesn’t want, through our beautiful rural neighborhoods.


14 posted on 06/07/2012 10:22:35 AM PDT by Eva
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: blam

Thanks for the post, Blam.

Right over the state line in MS we have the clueless mayor of Ocean Springs.

Roll Tide

http://www.sunherald.com/2012/05/22/3964283/theres-nothing-sinister-about.html


15 posted on 06/07/2012 10:28:29 AM PDT by logitech (Who's here so vile, that will not love his country? If any speak, for him I have offended)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: blam

I forgot to mention that these UN Agenda 21 multi-modal transportation projects are all called, Gateways. Do a search on Gateway terminal and take a look at the terminals around the world that are all, Gateways, all part of the Agenda 21.

Then look up Gateway 1 in Maine.


16 posted on 06/07/2012 10:32:33 AM PDT by Eva
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: blam

I’ve known a few rednecks. Never saw anything backward about ‘em. They’re just the sort of people I’d expect to lead the country away from darkness of a sissified socialistic nanny state.


25 posted on 06/07/2012 12:01:23 PM PDT by Little Ray (FOR the best Conservative in the Primary; AGAINST Obama in the General.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson