Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

would it be good to make student loans dischargeable consumer debt?
me ^ | 6-11-12 | TurboZamboni

Posted on 06/11/2012 12:25:20 PM PDT by TurboZamboni

IOW, why would it be good to make student loan debt dischargeable in bankruptcy like most other consumer debt?

(Excerpt) Read more at freerepublic.com ...


TOPICS: Chit/Chat; Education
KEYWORDS: bankruptcy; college; debt; loans
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-60 next last
Why isn't it now?(my assumption is because the gubmint holds most of the student loan debt and therefore the gubmint wants their money) And since the gubmint is now the primary loaner (and collector ,too) and they're the primary pusher claiming everyone should go to college(both R's and D's in Congress are always making this claim), they see the lemmings all getting their degrees and a guaranteed source of future income for The State and guaranteed jobs for the tenured Statists, not to mention a good place to continue indoctrination if the kids didn’t get enough in K-12.
1 posted on 06/11/2012 12:25:31 PM PDT by TurboZamboni
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: TurboZamboni

tax payer is missing from the discussion?


2 posted on 06/11/2012 12:29:32 PM PDT by Doogle (((USAF.68-73..8th TFW Ubon Thailand..never store a threat you should have eliminated)))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TurboZamboni

Student debt totals $870 billion!


3 posted on 06/11/2012 12:29:32 PM PDT by Zuben Elgenubi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TurboZamboni

It would be good to start titles with capital letters.


4 posted on 06/11/2012 12:29:47 PM PDT by humblegunner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TurboZamboni

It isn’t now because Republicans changed the law (at the behest of the private student loan lobby—bankers), such that in 2004, any guaranteed student loan is no longer dischargeable. What is the purpose of bankruptcy? To eliminate the debts of citizens so that they have a fresh start. To not include student loans denies the purpose of the bankruptcy laws. There is no “fresh start.” If you are against including student loans, then you should be against bankruptcy laws.


5 posted on 06/11/2012 12:32:03 PM PDT by DallasDeb (usafa06mom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TurboZamboni

No, don’t make it discharged through bankruptcy. Let these brilliant young minds do whenever consumers are ripped off wholesale - make them file the class action lawsuit like they should have.

And I’ll tell you where to start: Fraud, in charging ‘mandatory insurance’ to the student account. Student account items are supposed to be ONLY items directly related to the academic education of the student. Which means ASB is out, sports equipment can’t be charged to the student account, etc.

There’s enough relief in there to hammer out a more long term negotiated dropping of the student loans, and it would shut down immediately the wholesale ripping off of students by universities.


6 posted on 06/11/2012 12:33:06 PM PDT by kingu (Everything starts with slashing the size and scope of the federal government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TurboZamboni

I think it would be great, provided the US Taxpayer no longer guarantees or subsidises the loans.


7 posted on 06/11/2012 12:43:10 PM PDT by TheThirdRuffian (I will never vote for Romney. Ever.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Doogle
Taxpayers are not supposed to be in consumer debt bankrupcty matters, are they? Unless the lender is getting bailed out by goobermint, why would they be?
8 posted on 06/11/2012 12:46:14 PM PDT by TurboZamboni (Looting the future to bribe the present)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: TurboZamboni

Get the Federal Government out of the money handing out business, and make student loans like any other loan. You have colateral, borrow on it, don’t have colateral, work for it.

If the Government was in charge of sand in the Sahara, there would soon be a shortage.


9 posted on 06/11/2012 12:46:25 PM PDT by American in Israel (A wise man's heart directs him to the right, but the foolish mans heart directs him toward the left.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TurboZamboni

The federal government kicked private lenders out of the student loan business a couple years ago. If student loans are to be forgiven, it would be purely at the expense of the taxpayer. Forgiving student loan debt would simply be another way of encouraging young people to go to college who otherwise should not. It would add to the welfare/dependent on the government mentality and to the real numbers. Who will be left to pay taxes in the future?

For those who use student loan debt wisely, the outcome can be very good. They can potentially get into a career otherwise unavailable to them, and the earnings are generally better. I am thinking for positions such as health care fields, engineering, education, for example. If the students are also careful to select colleges and universities based more on costs than “status”, use junior college and state schools when appropriate, work some hours while in school, live at home if necessary, the student loans can be kept in check and be reasonable for repayment after graduation.


10 posted on 06/11/2012 12:46:41 PM PDT by NEMDF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DallasDeb

That being said, which kind of debts should be allowed to be “charged off” in bankruptcy ? Any? All? Some? None?(”not paying your debt is wrong. Period”)

What’s the alternative? We don’t really want debtors prisons, do we?

I can sympathize with the argument on huge medical bills, but IIRC, those are a very small percentage of the actual reasons for personal bankruptcies.


11 posted on 06/11/2012 12:48:12 PM PDT by TurboZamboni (Looting the future to bribe the present)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: TurboZamboni

They aren’t now because they’re guaranteed by the government, if they were dischargable they’d no longer be guaranteed, and by and large the people who need them wouldn’t be able to get them (nobody is going to give you a loan based on potential future earnings if you pass you classes).


12 posted on 06/11/2012 12:48:12 PM PDT by discostu (Listen, do you smell something?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TurboZamboni
It would be good for one specific and very important reason, which is that the free availability of federally guaranteed student loans has driven tuition rates through the roof, with no particular corresponding gains in the quality of the education gained thereby. The inability to discharge student loan debt through bankruptcy has contributed to tuition inflation by drastically reducing the degree of risk to lenders.

It does Johnny no good to come out of college with a four-year degree in Sociology and fifty grand worth of student debt, but the universities don't care... they've already got their money up front. In fact, it's actively in the interest of universities to produce just as many such Johnnies as they can.

13 posted on 06/11/2012 12:50:11 PM PDT by Oberon (Big Brutha Be Watchin'.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NEMDF

Reminds me of the housing debacle:a government-created circular firing squad.


14 posted on 06/11/2012 12:50:41 PM PDT by TurboZamboni (Looting the future to bribe the present)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: TurboZamboni
Yes. It should be discharge-able and, at the same time, the government should get out of the business completely. Let them sell their current loan portfolios on the private market at discounted rates.

Let private lenders make student loans based on what a degree is potentially worth. You want to major in mechanical engineering or nursing? great, here is your loan at 3% interest.

You are going to major in ethnic studies. OK, but it will cost you 18%.

College tuition would come down overnight. Colleges would set up their own funds and work with private lenders to keep their students. Hillsdale College already has a successful model in place doing exactly that. Grove City, Brigham Young, Liberty University and others are in the process of doing something comparable.

So far, only conservative colleges. But the principle is the same: teach kids something useful, they get a marketable degree and will pay back their loan, with interest, in a fairly timely manner.

15 posted on 06/11/2012 12:54:52 PM PDT by Vigilanteman (Obama: Fake black man. Fake Messiah. Fake American. How many fakes can you fit in one Zer0?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TurboZamboni
It is generally good and acceptable business practice for vendors to expect payment for services rendered.

Its a simple matter of personal responsibility. To the best of my knowledge, no one has ever been forced to take a student loan at gunpoint. Since they voluntarily applied for the loans they are responsible for paying them back.

16 posted on 06/11/2012 12:58:59 PM PDT by jboot (Emperor: "How will this end?" Kosh: "In fire.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TurboZamboni

Yes, make all new student loans dischargeable and none insured. This would force lenders to make responsible loans. It would also make the cost of higher education come down. The higher education business is overpriced because of the loans and no liability. Make it more of a free market entity and the whole system would work better.


17 posted on 06/11/2012 12:59:07 PM PDT by Ratman83
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TurboZamboni
My memory may be faulty, and if it is, someone please correct me. However, I seem to remember a time when School Loans used to be dischargable via bankruptcy.

If I recall, by the late 80’s or early 90’s, it became a routine practice for recent college grads to default on their school loans, and simply file for personal bankruptcy instead. They were young, had no assets, so they didn't care. The problem eventually became so widespread and epidemic that the government had to pass new laws stating that student loans could not be discharged via bankruptcy. Hence the situation we find ourselves in today.

If this law is repealed, look for the loan default problem to return - except young people's sense of entitlement today seems to be even higher that it was back then (if such a thing is possible). Hence, the problem will be much worse this time around.

I am not sure what the solution might be, but knowing human nature nowadays, I am certain that if the bankruptcy law is put back to the way it was before, that college students will once more begin taking advantage of the situation - and student loan defaults will explode all over again.

18 posted on 06/11/2012 1:02:49 PM PDT by Zetman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ratman83

BINGO!!!!!


19 posted on 06/11/2012 1:03:31 PM PDT by Osage Orange (God is my Co-Pilot.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Zuben Elgenubi
Student debt totals $870 billion!

It doesn't appear that they got their money's worth.

20 posted on 06/11/2012 1:05:42 PM PDT by Sirius Lee (Goode or Evil, that's the choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-60 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson