Skip to comments.The Dawkins Challenge
Posted on 06/14/2012 6:58:55 AM PDT by C19fan
click here to read article
I just have to assume you won’t pick a proposition and defend it because you can’t, otherwise you wouldn’t be arguing semantics. Good day.
With origins in the 17th century.
Take a careful look at what you say. Take a look at your series of tautologies.
Tell you what. I will let the reader of your post and my posts stand in stark contrast to each other.
It is hard to resist not commenting on your statement that "science is based on Bayesian probability". That is a remarkable statement. I will let it go at that. It is not important I rejoin such a statement. I will let the reader make an assessment. It is unsetteling to know that science, according to you, does not rely on logic.
You missed something.
Re: "Science is based on Bayesian probability."
That is a remarkable statement. ... It is not important I rejoin such a statement.
It should learn it though.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.