Posted on 07/02/2012 7:40:05 PM PDT by Halfmanhalfamazing
Simple enough question. We need to start using this option.
He clearly brought the country closer to tyranny, and that in my view is an impeachable offense. Outside of "my view", his job is to uphold the constitution.
He failed to do his job. He failed to protect the people. He failed to protect COTUS.
He should be fired.
My point is that Roberts has screwed the pooch with his “Can we all get along” approach and needs to be constantly reminded that his Chief Justiceship is now an Epic Fail.
No. Let’s stop coming up with silly options.
Gee, I hope we can get someone MORE conservative from Obama, don't you?
So Obama can replace him?
Definitely yes, but let’s wait until we have a Republican POTUS.
Roberts has shown himself to be of low moral character, and unfit to hold public office.
LOL! Court Jester Roberts is no patriot, he is a traitor and sold his soul and our liberty so he could be liked by liberals. His decision is a disaster for America and freedom for a long long time, possible forever. I would rather he rejected obamacare and upheld freedom, and Obama be re-elected, than have the monstrosity he foisted upon us.
You heard McConnell, they are going to wimp out. They are going to find a way to not repeal dickheadcare. They are wimpering castrati, they only care about their f***king careers and sticking it to us, and being exempted for dickheadcare.
Roberts screwed the pooch and America. I hope he is satisfied.
Indeed, but that is my point. He is not a stupid man and I believe that he did more good than harm intentionally.
Oh, yeah, the “silver lining”, or as they say, received ideas (Krauthammer, Will, et al. Yawn!) And Mr Roberts was so devilishly clever that he fooled those 4 liberals on the court, and they still don’t know better and will never know what hit ‘em.
No, Ginsburg is not worse; she has never pretended to be anything but what she is. We disagree with her idiologically, but that is not an impeachable offense.
Roberts is dishonest, and devoid of character.
If he was, I'm not sure what that would mean for him or the final SC decision on Obamacare.
The Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States of America should quickly and voluntarily submit to an Impeachment Trial to clear the integrity and good name of the Supreme Court.
If found guilty, the Chief Justice should have swift and severe Justice.
If he is found not guilty, then there will be hell to pay as every Federal Judge in the Federal Court System will legislate all cases brought before them in any manner that they see fit.
The polarization of America will then be complete, with the Supreme Court being the last of the major Federal Branches of Government to fall to the European Feudal/Socialist System of Slavery.
BTW, read my tag line for the correct legal opinion on this topic.
Earl Warren was very impeachable, but the congress was solidly communist at the time, so it went nowhere.
Just got home from work...obligitory shower took and beer drank...ping me tomorrow, as I gotta few opinions on yer subject...g’night.
I think KAGAN should be impeached for failure to recuse herself, but not until Romney can name her replacement.
It’s a silly academic question, since you know very well he will not be impeached over this or over anything else.
Roberts has shown himself to be of low moral character, and unfit to hold public office.
Roberts was appointed by a Republican POTUS. Maybe we should wait for a conservative POTUS. The odds on Romney being such a POTUS aren't good.
>> “There isn’t a provision for impeaching or firing SCOTUS members.” <<
.
A truly idiotic comment!
They’re impeachable for the same causes as any other official, plus one more: Immorality.
well...another thought...he should resign??? and the supreme court should disolve...why? because chief justice roberts, in my mind, seems to prefer the voters to make decisions, he explained he felt the need to defer to the masses/voters (lord help us)...so should the voters then decide all issues???? if so, where does the supreme court come into play?
roberts indicates they are irrelevant???
Instead, Roberts tried to make the Left's case for them in a way that he thought was slightly compatible with conservative ideals. Problem is, the Left is composed almost entirely of such unscrupulous liars and revisionists that they shouldn't have much trouble obscuring or otherwise getting around the fact that 0bamacare is primarily a government power grab pack of tax increases which they are fundamentally for, anyway.
Instead, Roberts tried to make the Left's case for them in a way that he thought was slightly compatible with conservative ideals. Problem is, the Left is composed almost entirely of such unscrupulous liars and revisionists that they shouldn't have much trouble obscuring or otherwise getting around the fact that 0bamacare is primarily a government power grab pack of tax increases which they are fundamentally for, anyway.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.