Skip to comments.We’ve Seen This Movie Before I(ROGER EBERT on the Aurora/Batman movie theater shooting)
Posted on 07/25/2012 11:43:56 PM PDT by a fool in paradiseEdited on 07/26/2012 4:29:13 AM PDT by Admin Moderator. [history]
JAMES HOLMES, who opened fire before the midnight premiere of “The Dark Knight Rises,” could not have seen the movie. Like many whose misery is reflected in violence, he may simply have been drawn to a highly publicized event with a big crowd...
(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...
The full credits rolled at the beginning of the movie.
I’ve heard it reported that one of the shooting victims in Aurora had recently survived ANOTHER shooting incident in a theater in Canada. Must still be America’s fault (if true).
ebert AND this article are both so full of sh!t you can smell it through the monitor.
The United States is one of few developed nations that accepts the notion of Freedom, with all its positive and negative possibilities...
Yes, Jessica Ghawi was her name. She was from San Antonio. Her Memorial Service will be Saturday at 10 a.m. at Community Bible Church in San Antonio
He shamelessly stole that from Marie Antoinette. By quoting this Mr. Ebert demonstrates that he, who lives in an ivory tower, has no clue why people have to live in bad neighborhoods. Quite often it's not because people love to fear a drive-by or a robbery or arson.
Should this young man whose nature was apparently so obvious to his mother that, when a ABC News reporter called, she said You have the right person have been able to buy guns, ammunition and explosives?
Uhmmm....Well, sure but that is not the context in which she said “You have the right person”.
Who cares what Mr. Liberal Rubberface thinks?
Unbelievable article written by a Chicago ‘Lib-une’ Tribune columnist Steve Chapman, who usually follows the lib party line but this time explains very well how more gun laws will not do anything.
Note: The Libune requires subscription to read articles but you can avoid it when the page loads just click ‘Print preview’ and scroll down to read. :)
What could be his meaning? We are acting contrary to our developed status? We should only allow super citizens (govt minions) to have weapons? Sounds like every so-called developed state which has no problem denying other rights to its not-to-be-trusted citizenry.
What jaw dropping stupidity. We dont want monsters or ministers to have a monopoly on force. It always leads to the crazies and true believers slaughtering the defenseless. His beloved policies are in full force in this civilian disarmament zone he would compel us all to enter. Look at every utopian cesspool and do the body count.
Two thumbs down.
Additionally, if someone is considered “too dangerous”, because of mental failings, to own a gun, should they even be permitted to walk the streets unescorted by a legal guardian?
There has been a hell of a lot of face biting by nutzos lately.
You made a BINGO!
Roger Ebert is in his final walk of life. Just as Red Ted Kennedy never had to live under Obama/Kennedy/Hillarycare, Ebert won't fear going to his press screenings because the common riffraff do not get attend. Ebert wants the REST of America to have to live under HIS socialist utopian dreams even if they will result in needless death and misery. He "means well".
I don't know if that was a purposeful choice of words regarding Ebert, but I LOL'd anyway!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.