Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sandusky Investigation Botched Under Pa. Gov. Corbett
newsmax ^ | 7-26-12 | Chris Freind

Posted on 07/27/2012 7:06:01 PM PDT by FlJoePa

It is Corbett himself who is most guilty of hesitating. Hesitating as then-attorney general to appropriately staff the Jerry Sandusky investigation, and hesitating for years to make an arrest, both of which jeopardized children. That hesitation, and Corbett’s stonewalling, has created an intense firestorm.

(Excerpt) Read more at newsmax.com ...


TOPICS: Miscellaneous; Sports
KEYWORDS: blunders; pa; psu; sandusky; weare
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041 next last
To: FlJoePa
It is a fact, and stop denying it.

There was hard evidence that he knew about the 1998 incident.

And he didn't get second hand information, he got first hand information from one of his own coaches.

21 posted on 07/27/2012 10:34:34 PM PDT by fortheDeclaration (Pr 14:34 Righteousness exalteth a nation:but sin is a reproach to any people)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: zeestephen
Suggestions that Paterno had a responsibility to “follow up” on the shower allegations are legally bizarre.

He had a MORAL responsibility to followup and find out why a former coach was in a shower with a young boy.

I know you Joe Pa apologists can't deal with that reality.

22 posted on 07/27/2012 10:37:26 PM PDT by fortheDeclaration (Pr 14:34 Righteousness exalteth a nation:but sin is a reproach to any people)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Lancey Howard
No one said he was the ONLY one responsible.

This is typical straw man nonsense, accuse others that 'they must think Paterno is the only one responsible', so you can establish your own wrong position, 'Since Paterno wasn't the only one responsible, Paterno had no responsibility at all' The more this gets investigated, the more Paterno is going to be exposed.

23 posted on 07/27/2012 10:43:46 PM PDT by fortheDeclaration (Pr 14:34 Righteousness exalteth a nation:but sin is a reproach to any people)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: fortheDeclaration

And Paterno is obviously the one you care most about destroying.
Get a life.


24 posted on 07/27/2012 10:55:54 PM PDT by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: FlJoePa

hmmmm


25 posted on 07/28/2012 12:06:10 AM PDT by onona (loving butter pecan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fortheDeclaration
As I noted in my comment:

No lawyer, for the prosecution or the defense, would have told Paterno ANYTHING.

No police investigator would have told Paterno ANYTHING.

Equally important, Paterno had NO WAY of knowing if McQueary’s report on the shower incident was true or false, exaggerated or factual, mistaken or imagined.

If Paterno had aggressively reported this hearsay to authorities outside his usual supervisors, he ran the risk of being sued by Sandusky if the hearsay was false.

26 posted on 07/28/2012 1:06:16 AM PDT by zeestephen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: fortheDeclaration
We may agree on one thing, Declaration.

I would agree with you if you claim Paterno had a moral responsibility to advise McQueary to file a police report.

Frankly, I find McQueary's failure to file a police report to be shocking, especially since he discussed this incident several times with his own father.

It makes me question McQueary's honesty.

27 posted on 07/28/2012 1:28:31 AM PDT by zeestephen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: zeestephen
I would agree with you if you claim Paterno had a moral responsibility to advise McQueary to file a police report.

Doesn't that say it all with respect to Paterno's culpability? The fact that he didn't advise McQueary to file was the beginning of the coverup.

Joe Paterno failure to appropriately advise McQueary resulted in numerous other children being scarred for life.

28 posted on 07/28/2012 4:43:21 AM PDT by JohnG45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: FlJoePa; All

FReepers!

The liberals would love to hang Corbett because he is the key to Pennsylvania’s natural gas industry.

If the liberals can sink Corbett, they can block natural gas drilling.

So, they are attempting to insert Corbett into the Sandusky affair.

Sandusky was under investigation long before Corbett was attorney general.

This Corbett angle is liberal obfuscation and politics.


29 posted on 07/28/2012 5:12:44 AM PDT by Erik Latranyi (When religions have to beg the gov't for a waiver, we are already under socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fortheDeclaration

<>Joe Pa’s supporters want to make him a martyr.<>

Oh shut up. Why don’t you read something for once before popping off:

http://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2012/07/the-case-against-joe-paterno-weak-to-non-existent-on-the-current-record.php


30 posted on 07/28/2012 9:01:32 AM PDT by Uncle Chip
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Erik Latranyi

Joe Paterno was a loyal conservative and Republican and friend of the Bushs. Does the same go for him?


31 posted on 07/28/2012 9:24:14 AM PDT by Uncle Chip
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: JohnG45
The fact that he didn't advise McQueary to file was the beginning of the coverup.

Oh baloney.

McQueary said early on that he did notify the police -- meaning Gary Schultz who had oversight over the PSUPD. In talking with Schultz he thought he was talking to "the police". Schultz told him that he would take it from there to the necessary authorities and never did. That's where the cover-up began, and that's what the Grand Jury found.

32 posted on 07/28/2012 9:33:26 AM PDT by Uncle Chip
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: JohnG45
You forget to mention that Sandusky had been previously cleared of an abuse charge in 1998, after an investigation by five different government agencies.

I don't think Paterno can be faulted for proceeding with a certain amount of caution after that.

You also forget that the only version we have of the Paterno-McQueary meeting was reported by McQueary.

There is NO rebuttal version by Paterno.

Personally, I would want to hear Paterno’s side of that story before I tore down his statue.

And I still can't get past the shock that McQueary, who claims he witnessed a child rape, never filed a police report on his own.

Would you have failed to file a report?

I doubt it.

Would your own father - like McQueary’s father - advise you NOT to file a police report?

I doubt it.

33 posted on 07/28/2012 4:42:50 PM PDT by zeestephen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: zeestephen
You also forget that the only version we have of the Paterno-McQueary meeting was reported by McQueary.

There is NO rebuttal version by Paterno.

NO rebuttal by Paterno? He had the opportunity to rebut but didn't. Was that because McQueary's version was accurate? I think so.

Re: Personally, I would want to hear Paterno’s side of that story before I tore down his statue.

Paterno had the opportunity to speak but didn't.

And what about Paterno's comment outside his home, "I wish I had done more." He could have done more, but didn't.

Case closed!

34 posted on 07/28/2012 4:55:23 PM PDT by JohnG45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Chip
Oh baloney.

You're right. Joe Paterno had no culpability in this matter whatsoever.

Joe Paterno: "I wish I had done more."

35 posted on 07/28/2012 5:06:13 PM PDT by JohnG45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: JohnG45
You're right. Joe Paterno had no culpability in this matter whatsoever. Joe Paterno: "I wish I had done more."

Yeh -- in retrospect he should have done Tim Curry's job for him, as well as Gary Schultz's and Graham Spanier's.

36 posted on 07/28/2012 5:29:56 PM PDT by Uncle Chip
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: JohnG45
Paterno had the opportunity to speak but didn't.

He spoke to the Grand Jury.

Oh you must be referring to the press conference he was going to have outside his home that Graham Spanier, the President of PSU, called and told him to cancel.

Should he have held it anyway???

37 posted on 07/28/2012 5:39:33 PM PDT by Uncle Chip
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Chip
Should he have held it anyway???

YES!!

Wouldn't you have? Or, are you an enabler too?

38 posted on 07/28/2012 6:00:44 PM PDT by JohnG45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: JohnG45

The press conference that was cancelled was in 2011 — well past the ennabling stage.


39 posted on 07/28/2012 6:13:21 PM PDT by Uncle Chip
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: JohnG45
Case Closed?

C’mon, John.

This is 2012.

Paterno was facing both criminal and civil litigation risk.

Have you really not learned the lesson of George Zimmerman in the Trayvon Martin case?

Even if you are completely innocent, SAY NOTHING to the public, SAY NOTHING to the police.

40 posted on 07/28/2012 9:46:13 PM PDT by zeestephen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson