So....... you're advocating as a first reaction to the trespassing, shooting all of the visitors (whom are bringing out of state money to your community) in the head, as well as their dogs/cats/ferrets/cockatoos? Better yet, chase them out of your yard then shoot them int heir head on someone else's property as they are fleeing.
Where the hell did I say that? Where did I ever imply that? People need to respect the property rights of landowners...simple as that. Just because they are 'bringing money to our community', I am to allow them access to my property whenever they deem it necessary? I don't think so.
posted on 08/01/2012 7:12:00 PM PDT
by who knows what evil?
(G-d saved more animals than people on the ark...www.siameserescue.org.)
To: who knows what evil?; brent13a
There is serious animosity between NH and MA residents.
I hate it when they come up here. Their behavior on the roads and at the tourist attractions brings the animosity on themselves.
Witness the MA cop who came up here for a minor league game, then got fired for yelling racist slurs in a family environment. Turns out he had a long history of that behavior.
MA residents aren’t welcome here, and they know it.
posted on 08/01/2012 7:25:15 PM PDT
To: who knows what evil?
Where the hell did I say that? Where did I ever imply that?
Your original comments in context with the above story garners that implication. Your comments in context with the shooters actions of the story lead me to deduce that no matter what, you support his decision to kill the "leafer's" dog just because it came onto his property. You then replace the "dog" of the story with Human trespassers, and state there is "simmering anger".
posted on 08/01/2012 7:34:17 PM PDT
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson